Criminal enterprise 'Fair Game' racketeering through abusive phone calls
Church case told of phone calls to clients
A company director and brother-in-law of a woman who is suing the
Church of Scientology for damages told the High Court yesterday he was
informed that between 25 and 40 phone calls were made by a person with
an American accent to his clients and to private individuals.
Mr Paul O'Kelly, Edenderry, Co Offaly, was continuing his evidence in
the action by his sister-in-law, Ms Mary Johnston (40), against the
Church of Scientology in Dublin and three of its members for alleged
conspiracy, misrepresentation and breach of her constitutional rights.
Before Mr O'Kelly resumed his evidence, another witness, Mr Michael
Cleary, a director of Rotofab, a plastic moulding company, said Mr
O'Kelly's company, O'Kelly Sutton, marketing consultants, did some
work for Rotofab when the latter began business. Later, Mr O'Kelly
became a shareholder and member of Rotofab.
In 2002 , he received a phone call from a Tom Bishop, who had an
American accent and who said he was doing a due diligence report on
O'Kelly Sutton for an American company. He had told Mr Bishop that
they were very happy with the work O'Kelly Sutton had done for
Rotofab.
The caller asked what Mr Cleary knew about Mr O'Kelly's other
interests. Some weeks later he received a faxed document from Tom
Bishop which outlined a series of situations in relation to O'Kelly
Sutton but mainly in relation to Mr O'Kelly. The document was headed
TR World Corporate Services, Zurich. He knew nothing about this
company. He thought the phone call he had received had been from
America.
Mr Sen Ryan SC, for Ms Johnston, said the document claimed to be
conducting a due diligence and background for the benefit of a large
corporation and named O'Kelly Sutton, Paul O'Kelly and Patrick Sutton.
Mr Cleary said the document claimed Mr O'Kelly had been dropped from a
FS panel due to his connection with Rotofab as there had been a
conflict of interest. Rotofab had had a little involvement with FS but
before Mr O'Kelly became a shareholder.
When he read the document, he was surprised and a little worried about
some of the stuff in it, Mr Cleary said. His business partner was
quite upset. Having spoken to Mr O'Kelly, Mr Cleary said he had told
his business partner there was nothing to worry about.
Cross-examined by Mr John Trainor SC, for the church, Mr Cleary agreed
that when Mr O'Kelly was acting as a consultant to Rotofab, he was on
a FS panel and they had hoped Rotofab could get grant aided.
He agreed that O'Kelly Sutton was a large firm of marketing
consultants with a number of prestigious clients.
Mr O'Kelly, in his evidence, said Mr Cleary had contacted him about
the faxed document and had been distressed and concerned. He had been
delighted to be told about the phone call received by Mr Cleary as it
was only one of between 30 and 40 calls received by the O'Kelly Sutton
company's clients.
About 25 to 30 clients and private individuals had told him they had
received inquiries - all with American accents - and all the calls
gave different "purposes".
Cross-examined by Mr Trainor, Mr O'Kelly said the first he heard about
Ms Johnston's involvement in scientology was when she told him "it
was great".
Mr O'Kelly said he formed the view that scientology was
"hogwash". He had visited the church's Dublin mission.
Asked what he was doing there, Mr O'Kelly said, because of his
concern, he had gone in and did the personality test to which he
gave random answers.
Source: Irish Times
Publication date: 2003-02-01
[Note: The
Scientology®
organization has at best estimate approximately
45,000 to 50,000 followers world wide -- contrary to the 8 million figure
that the organization has been claiming for the past few years or so.
While that number continues to drop (thanks in part to the Internet) few
of the remaining followers are even aware of the unending series of police
raids, indictments, and prison terms their leaders and fellow cultists are
subjected to routinely. Few are allowed to know about their organization's
criminal history, or its current racketeering activities. Even fewer of
the cult's remaining followers are privy to their messiah's written
policies which dictates the criminal behavior that keeps getting their
organization raided (see Xenu.NET for
suitable references of Scientology policy) Scientology management
is the problem, not the thousands of honest believers who are good,
honest citizens; themselves victims of Scientology - flr]
The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology organization through one of their many front groups. The name "Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank