The Electronic Telegraph 15 March 1995
Friend cleared of Scientology kidnapping
I feel insulted, says woman as jury decides that she was brainwashed
A MAN who tried to remove a woman from the Church of Scientology was
cleared of attempted kidnap yesterday after arguing that
"brainwashing" by the cult had turned her into a robot without the
ability to decide whether she consented or not to leaving.
Stephen Cooper's "victim", 23-year-old former shoe shop worker Miss
Kathleen Wilson, told the jury that she was happy to be at the cult's
headquarters at Saint Hill Castle in East Grinstead, East Sussex, and
did not consent to being removed. The court also heard he had admitted
to police he intended to "snatch her" against her will.
But Cooper, 27, who runs a newsagent's shop, was cleared at Lewes
Crown Court of the charge by a jury which retired at 12.53pm, began
their lunch at 1pm and returned with unanimous verdicts at 2pm.
His counsel, Mr John Tanzer, argued that, even though she claimed in
court she did not consent to removal, it was possible her free will
had been removed by the processes she had undergone in the cult and
she did not have "sufficient intelligence and understanding" to decide
if she consented.
'British justice has won today'
After the verdict, a delighted Cooper said: "I wasn't confident. I
thought the evidence was against me but the jury was fantastic. In my
eyes, British justice has won today."
Scientology officials took a different view, warning the verdict would
act as a "green light" to those who wanted to remove members from
sects. Miss Wilson, a former flatmate of Cooper, said: "I am outraged.
I feel insulted by the verdict. Instead of judging Stephen, they
judged me. I said I wanted to stay at Saint Hill and I meant it. I was
not brainwashed."
Mr Justice Hidden told the jury that Scientology was not on trial and
that they did not have to decide if it was a cult or a religion.
The issue was Stephen Cooper's acts and intentions when he went to
Saint Hill with another man on the night of Nov 6, 1992. To prove
attempted kidnap, the Crown had to establish four elements - an
attempt to remove her, that it was by force, that it was without
lawful excuse and that she did not consent.
The first two elements were not challenged - Mr Cooper admitted to
police he went to snatch her, "probably against her will", after being
contacted by her mother - and the judge ruled he could not offer a
defence of lawful excuse because that would require a belief that she
faced physical danger. But the judge ruled that there could be a
possible defence on the grounds of consent, even though Miss Wilson
testified that she did not consent.
This enabled Mr Tanzer to tell the jury some of the evidence suggested
a regime in which she was effectively enslaved and robbed of her free
will.
'She was deprived of her own free will'
"Kathleen Wilson was a victim. She was deprived of her own free will
and Stephen Cooper sought to rescue her. She never said she wanted to
be rescued but we say, simply, that is because she couldn't. If a
member of our society is turned into a robot, turned into a slave, is
that person consenting? A robot is programmed as to what to say. The
person underneath has been suppressed and enslaved."
Cooper, he said, was not a "malign kidnapper using unwarranted force
to take away a damsel manifestly not in distress". Rather, he wanted
to "put her in a position" to make her own free choice.
Outside court, Cooper, from Saltburn, Cleveland, said the last two
years had been a nightmare. He planned to marry Miss Lorna Bowden, 23,
the one-time close friend of Miss Wilson. "I was only interested in
the welfare of Kathleen. We felt she had changed after joining them.
Lorna said she was always easily-led and that she had to look after
her at school."
----
By John Steele, Courts Correspondent
"Liberty is my religion." -- Robert G. Ingersoll
http://www.norahjones.com
[Note: The
Scientology®
organization has at best estimate approximately
45,000 to 50,000 followers world wide -- contrary to the 8 million figure
that the organization has been claiming for the past few years or so.
While that number continues to drop (thanks in part to the Internet) few
of the remaining followers are even aware of the unending series of police
raids, indictments, and prison terms their leaders and fellow cultists are
subjected to routinely. Few are allowed to know about their organization's
criminal history, or its current racketeering activities. Even fewer of
the cult's remaining followers are privy to their messiah's written
policies which dictates the criminal behavior that keeps getting their
organization raided (see Xenu.NET for
suitable references of Scientology policy) Scientology management
is the problem, not the thousands of honest believers who are good,
honest citizens; themselves victims of Scientology - flr]
The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology organization through one of their many front groups. The name "Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank