Here's an interesting exchange between myself, a fellow free-thinker, and
a Luddite who confuses science and technology with human failing. Keep in
mind that the Luddite in question is using a computer -- and seem to see
no irony in the fact.
The reference to "Incubus" and "Satan's dupes" the
Luddite speaks of is in reference to
Richard Smith who handles any of
the many questions The Skeptic Tank receives concerning Wicca or neo-Pagani
-- life-affirming, nature-based religions popular in England and the United
States. (Wicca is only some 60 years old whereas neo-Pagani seeks to
return to a somewhat idealistic conglomeration of nature-based religions
which existed long before Christianity destroyed them.)
This discussion took place on the FidoNet HolySmoke echo. Sadly, the
hurtful truth seems to be a bit too embarrassing for him so he elected not
to continue trying to defend his lost position.
Fri 5 Sep 97 10:02
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
All you have to do is produce evidence that your deity constructs
exists, David. All you have to do is show the world that the history of
the Christian cult is some how entirely inaccurate and some kind
of hoax.
That'll stop us hurtful heathens up quite effectively, you know.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
I keep asking you questions. Why doesn't Vyger answer?
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
You may begin at any time. <smirk>
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Science won this debate some 1460 years ago when scientific method
started to evolve into a successful methodology. People like you got
left behind, that's all.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Science always wins, David. Always.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Science wins again.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
And do you honestly think that the "fellow atheists" in this
forum fail to recognize the differences between a bloody cult like
Christianity and life-affirming religions like Wicca and Pagani?
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
What we find, however, are people such as yourself who desperately need
to learn the origins of your own cult. You're not allowed to learn.
You're not allowed to understand science because you are told that it
somehow detracts from your occult beliefs.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Any why wouldn't they? Knowing the evil of Christianity yet needing a
belief, Pagani or Wicca provides a positive, life-affirming alternative.
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Oh... Unless you have evidence for your gods or goddesses?
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Fredric Rice
Science wins again.
Thu 4 Sep 97 15:23
Fredric Rice
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
David Ragland
Karl Schneider
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
FR> While ignoring the facts which debunk your
FR> own pantheon, huh? <smirk> Science wins again.
dr> Your puerile smirks and capricious affirmations of `winning'
dr> indicates a penchant for combativeness and a total lack of any
dr> desire to learn the real truth about anything.
It's very curious how believers in the occult always want to pretend
that those who repeatedly ask them for evidence to back up their beliefs
are experiencing "a total lack of any desire to learn the real truth."
dr> Hell, who knows what you have on your mind to prove? You
dr> contradict your own alleged mission statement of the Skeptic
dr> Tank with the use of satan's dupe(s).
<laughing!> There's a really bizarre occult claim. Do you have any
evidence that there's a "Satan" leave alone that it has "dupes?"
dr> Do you have any idea what you really stand for?
I sure do. Would you like a quick summation?
dr> Why do you obsess so?
I could well imagine why you feel that working to end deadly superstitious
ignorance is an "obsession." Having a long history of suffering from
religion yourself, I don't doubt you feel any education is "obsessive."
dr> Have you lost sight of what these conversations are meant to do?
No, we have been debunking fundy occult claims for six years now. And
-- god willing -- we'll continue to do so until fundy religion is dead.
dr> Exchange ideas, Fred. Nothing more.
When you pretend to include your intellectual and moral superiors in
with your occult delusions, you must provide evidence to back up your
"exchange of ideas," David.
dr> Believing that anyone ever wins the debate of God's existence
dr> on the basis of what man's science has unearthed is ludicrous.
The mere fact that the origins of deity constructs are well known,
coupled to the fact that there is no evidence for any of the countless
gods and goddesses, is all that's needed to debunk entirely such claims.
dr> Science wins what?
Absolutely everything. You have a problem with polio? Salk used science
to find a cure. You have a problem with feeding a large populace and
providing potable waters to a growing populace? Science finds the answer.
dr> Who awarded the prize?
Every scientist who has ever made a contribution to the collective
knowledge awards the fruits of his and her work to most (if not eventually
all) of humanity.
dr> Where and when was the contest held?
It's held in every laboratory, university, class room, and industry in
the world.
dr> I missed it, Fred.
You were in church at the time.
dr> What were the rules?
Would you like a lesson on what constitutes scientific method? Is
that what you're asking? Or is your question rhetorical so that you may
ignore the hurtful truth?
dr> Since when am I in a battle with science because of my belief in God?
Science has already won. From archaeology to zoology, science has
already put "paid" to the unevidenced notion of gods, goddesses,
vampires and werewolves.
dr> Our views on scientific findings may
dr> differ, but I highly regard it nevertheless.
You discard science when it proves your religious occultism mistaken.
dr> You speak as if you worship science
I can well imagine that a cultist would try to convince himself
of that notion to avoid an uncomfortable truth about his own religion.
dr> and rail so against what you refer to
dr> as hocus pocus (religion) yet. . . Behold!
<laughing!> I can see that my web pages have upset you, David.
Perhaps they will make you start thinking for yourself again.
> Richard Smith handles all questions and concerns
> about Wicca and Pagani. Wicca and Pagani are life-affirming
> religions which have nothing to do with the Christian gods
> and goddesses. Regardless of this undeniable fact, many
> fundamentalists are programmed to believe that Wiccans and
> Pagans are "Satanists." Richard Smith can help provide
> information about the origins of Wicca and Neo-Pagani as
> well as help debunk the myths that fundamentalist Christians
> like to perpetuate about life-affirming religions.
dr> Life affirming religions?
Yes indeed. As opposed to extremist Christian cults. But then I doubt
you're allowed to even know what those cults' history has been just as
I doubt you're allowed to know that it has been and continues to be the
single most deadly cult ever created by men.
dr> It that was does the trick for ya, Fred? Is that the `catch
dr> phrase' that enables you to place Incubus on the staff and not
dr> be crucified by your fellow atheists?
<laughing!> Do you even know who Richard Smith is?
dr> And why would you go to such lengths?
Gee. Why did the allies put a stop to fascist Nazi aggression?
dr> Why would you create such a laughable shroud to half-heartedly
dr> cloak this person who believes in god(s) that are far less visible
dr> than the Christian God and then place him on your staff?
<rofl!> You can't find any evidence for your deity constructs
and yet you want to pretend that those who construct archtypes and worship
trees are some how less deluded than members of your own cult.
That's just too cool.
dr> I suppose I see some amount of humor in
dr> this move, but definitely no intelligence.
I don't doubt that for an instant. You were in church at the
time you should have been acquiring an education, after all.
dr> The answer is simple.
No doubt in keeping with the simple mind which concocted it, huh? <smirk>
dr> You would live with `anything', even lying to yourself, to
dr> gather what your assume is armament against the truth of Christianity.
The simple fact that the origins of the Christian cult are well known,
coupled to the fact that there is no evidence for any of the Christian gods
have already answered any possible questions as to the validity of the cult.
dr> You are wrong, however.
Science is never wrong.
dr> Deploying the services of pagans and new age dupes greatly
dr> pollutes your work. It makes you look like a hypocrite
dr> among things.
I don't doubt that you've been told to believe that. In actual fact
what we find is that having a well-educated neo-Pagan operate as a
representative of a life-affirming religion has helped people see and
understand the fact that if they wish to divest themselves of the
deadly Christian cult, there are alternate, more uplifting religions
to choose from.
dr> I have a question for ya, Fred.
And for some reason you're afraid to answer any of mine. I suppose
that, too, is an artifact of your having acquired your educated from
within the confounds of a Christian church.
dr> What Christian Goddesses are you referring to?
You have no idea what the origins of the Christian cult are, huh? You
have doubtless wondered why Christians engage in the Fertility Festival
of Isis every Easter and yet you've probably asked one of your masters
to reconcile the conflict for you.
dr> It's a pity you consider yourself an adversary to me when
dr> it is God you are really fighting against, but cannot see it.
Since your deity constructs don't appear to exist and, as we both
know so well, have known origins which are embarrassing to you, it would
be pretty silly to try to pretend that I "fight against" anything
but willful superstitious ignorance and slavery to men.
dr> And this is one battle you will lose admittedly and on bended
dr> knee regardless of how often you avail yourself to trying to insult
dr> His servants and prove them wrong.
Your sweaty Alpha Male sodomite fantasies and threats have no effect
upon the better educated, David. Only believers in the occult can be
frightened by it.
dr> Peace,
Ironic, huh? Your violent threats end with the word "peace."
FR><smirk> Science wins again.
DR>Your puerile smirks and capricious affirmations of `winning'
DR>indicates a penchant for combativeness and a total lack of any
DR>desire to learn the real truth about _anything_. Don't be such a
Wow. I'll bet your Thesaurus is still warm.
DR>intention of learning from conversations in here, Fred. You feel
DR>there is nothing anyone can show you. You want to dominate these
DR>inconsequential dialectics and prove. . .
Do you feel there is anything anyone can show you?
DR>ludicrous. Science wins what? Who awarded the prize? Where and
DR>when was the contest held? I missed it, Fred. What were the
DR>rules? Since when am I in a battle with science because of my
Science wins the debate, David. Truth awarded the prize, and the
contest was held on planet Earth beginning a couple thousand years ago
and came to an essential halt a few years ago. And of course you missed
it; you were too busy genuflecting to your imaginary deity and your
earthly masters to notice.
DR>belief in God? Our views on scientific findings may differ,
DR>but I highly regard it nevertheless.
Highly regard what?
DR>the truth of Christianity. You are wrong, however. Deploying
DR>the services of pagans and new age dupes greatly pollutes your
DR>work. It makes you look like a hypocrite among things.
Did you just learn the word 'dupe'? You seem to like it.
DR>fighting against, but cannot see it. And this is one battle
DR>you will lose admittedly and on bended knee regardless of how
DR>often you avail yourself to trying to insult His servants and
DR>prove them wrong.
We don't need to 'prove' anything, Raghead. All we have to do is
expose their insanity.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page.