Abuse Down Under: "Inside the Cult"
This was posted to a.r.s. a about 6 years or so ago, and was one of
the articles that convinced me to stop defending Scientology and
Scientology Inc.
http://www.caic.org.au/psyther/sci/cosinoz.htm
The Advertiser, Adelaide, Australia
Twenty Twenty, England
A former Adelaide journalist infiltrated the Church of Scientology in
England. Exposed and arrested, she tells her story.
THE brief had seemed relatively straightforward - to enter the Church
of Scientology and secretly film some of its courses, widely
criticised around the world for allegedly using mind-control
techniques. There was no shortage of background material on the
church, as it had been shrouded in controversy for many years. The
organisation had been subjected to legal and political investigations
in Australia, England and its birthplace, the United States. Its
activities are constantly attracting publicity across the world.
Founded by a science-fiction writer, L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of
Scientology has its own vocabulary, hierarchy, rules, regulations and
agenda. It boasts a worldwide membership of more than 4 million people
and one of the biggest computer databases of personal information in
existence. For my investigation, I was to be recruited into the Poole
"mission" of the church, in South England. My producers chose Poole
because it was one of the most successful Scientology operations in
the world. My task was to work my way into headquarters of the elite
"Sea Organisation" (Sea Org), where mainly young members work for
the church and live in a mansion on England's South Coast. The Sea
Org's stated goal is to save the world. As a result, a standard
employee's contract is for one billion years - that is, your life and
all your lives to come.
My story, for British television company Twenty Twenty, was to be
aired in a current-affairs series, The Big Story. But I never imagined
the lengths the Church of Scientology would go to in its effort to
stop the program from being broadcast. Nor the way it would deal with
those involved.
TRAINING
My assignment began by creating a false name, life and identity which
was repeatedly tested until I knew it backwards. Past scientologists
came to teach me how to avoid being hypnotised. They showed me how to
keep my mind occupied during concentrated sessions, which could last
for several hours, and yet appear to be affected.
I also studied how to cheat the E-Meter, a primitive lie detector
widely used within the Church of Scientology for, among other things,
security checks. Holding two cans in your hand, it passes an
electrical current through your body and your emotional responses are
assessed by a scientologist who monitors a dial with a needle.
Interrogations can include questions like "Are you or have you ever
been involved in the media?" and "Have you ever had unkind thoughts
about L. Ron Hubbard?".
For those who make it further into the church's hierarchy, there is
the "Whole Security Check", which demands answers to questions like
"Have you ever destroyed a culture?", "Have you ever bred bodies
for degrading purposes?" and "Did you come to Earth for evil
purposes?".
I practised using a micro-camera lens hidden in a pair of spectacles.
Recording and sound equipment was strapped to a corset. A psychologist
came to assess my personality. His findings would be compared with
those of the scientologists' well-known, 200-question personality
test, "The Standard Oxford Capacity Analysis", which soon would be
used on me. As a final safeguard, I signed a contract giving my
permission to be forcibly removed from the Church of Scientology's
premises in case I was brainwashed.
RECRUITMENT
The Scientology recruiter who stopped me in the Poole Mall said he was
promoting a book. He said he wanted to ask me some questions. This is
a standard technique. The goal is to stop people, ask them some
preliminary questions and then take them to a Scientology office where
they are asked to do the Standard Oxford Capacity Analysis. This test
usually shows that a person is in need of what is known within the
organisation as "dianetic auditing". I followed my recruiter to a
book display centre to learn more about dianetics, which I was told
could improve my life, memory and relationships. I was asked to
complete the personality test and drop it off at the Scientology
office, or "college", that evening.
The Scientology personality test asks curious questions like "Are you
a slow eater?", "Do you often whistle or sing just for the fun of
it?", "When unexpected things happen, do some of your muscles have
jerking motions?", "Do you consider too much money is spent on
social security", "Are you opposed to the probation system for
criminals?" and "Do you browse through railway timetables,
directories or dictionaries just for pleasure?". Its results are
drawn on to a graph, which invariably shows personal problems,
requiring the need to spend money on taking Scientology courses to
improve one's life. As expected, the findings of my earlier,
professional psychological test contrasted strongly with their
results.
That evening, at the "college", I had my first taste of the skilful
and hard-sell techniques of the church's recruiters, who are given
targets to be reached at the end of each week. Most people at Poole
appeared to work long days, at least six days a week. One
ex-scientologist told me he earned 90 ($A180) a week. However, if
targets were not met, this could fall to as low as 2.50 ($A5) a week.
Graphs charting the financial and membership status of the Poole
mission were pinned to walls in the building. I learnt Scientology
"missions" compete to beat the others found throughout the world.
I arrived at the college at 9pm. By 10.30pm, I had been in the
"public contact" secretary's office for over an hour. I was feeling
vulnerable and depressed. Although I was determined not to sign up for
anything during the marathon session, or hand over any money that
evening, I ended up signing up just to get away. I handed over the
special half-price fee of 32.25 for five hours of "auditing".
"Auditing" sessions typically would start with understanding and
friendship from the Scientology staff as they discussed problems and
offered solutions. Then they would question the effectiveness of
outside forms of help, and suggest that only by undertaking a
Scientology course would an improvement be achieved.
COURSES
There are many types of Scientology "auditing" courses. The object
is to "clear" the person - to cancel all their "engrams" left
behind by negative experiences. A promotional video explains
"engrams" by showing a woman who falls to the floor. While
unconscious, a tap is running in the kitchen and her husband comments
she looks terrible. As a result, every time a tap runs she thinks she
looks terrible.
To cancel all one's "engrams" usually takes at least 200 hours,
although it can take thousands. Each session costs money. The evidence
of a "clear" person is apparently someone with near-perfect memory
and glowing health: radiant personalities free from disease. My
"auditing" entailed describing a negative event in my life to my
auditor over and over again, in order that I could talk about the
event free from any emotion connected with it.
The auditor spoke in a slow, soothing monotone in a method similar to
that used in hypnosis. He wrote down everything I said. After my
auditing was completed, I was congratulated before it was recommended
I do a "Purification Rundown". Through massive doses of vitamins and
an average of five hours of sauna a day, along with running
activities, the program is claimed to release you from all legal and
illegal drugs and alcohol which otherwise would linger forever in your
system.
I refused to do this course so it was suggested I do the "Success
Through Communications" course, as my personality test had shown I
had problems communicating. I agreed to this, paid 58 and endured
three days of inane work and drills. I spent two, boring hours
sitting, staring at a scientologist. There are other strange drills,
including ignoring anything your partner is saying, pretending to
sound interested, changing the subject and answering a question by
ignoring it.
PUNISHMENT
Any criticism of courses or the church was strictly forbidden. Church
members told me it was part of a plot by the "suppressive or
anti-social" person to stop any good being done in the world. Even
among members, nothing critical was ever said, although it appeared
obvious to me some people were unhappy about work conditions. I got
the impression that the feeling within the cult is like that of a
dictatorial regime - you never know who your friends are and you were
always being watched. Every scientologist is expected to report
anything they hear which is contrary to the church teachings. Anyone
who does anything rebellious or fails substantially could be sent on
the infamous "Rehabilitation Project Force" (RPF). Stories from
ex-cult members describe cramped sleeping arrangements, hard manual
labor and security checks (or "evil purpose editing").
COSTS
After a handful of courses, my future worth to the church was to be
determined. I was sent to the head of the mission to have my finances
assessed. I said I had very little money left but hinted I would have
access to an inheritance in a few weeks.
The mission head suddenly was interested. He persisted with suggesting
ways I could get the money as soon as possible, so I could get started
with future courses. One costing 2000 was deemed best for me. I was
lucky though and ended up paying only half of another course which
cost only about 100. It has been well documented by the media that
other people who have become involved with the Church of Scientology
have not been so fortunate.
PERSUASION
It may seem incredible that otherwise intelligent people can fall
victim but they are given little time to think, have other interests
or see their friends. As a new recruit, I was seldom left alone and
would be personally escorted from room to room - even if I knew where
to go.
Sometimes I was even followed into the toilet and asked questions. On
my second visit, when I went to move my car, I was escorted there and
back.
When I decided it was time to make my run for the church headquarters,
the Sea Org, I entered on the pretext of visiting a mansion formerly
owned by L. Ron Hubbard. After discussions, I was asked if I'd be
interested in joining the staff. There, I found members were working
and studying from 8am to 10pm.
I had become used to filling out questionnaires, surveys, writing
testimonies and being asked security questions. But at Sea Org
headquarters, I was introduced to the "Life History" questionnaire,
which topped them all.
I was asked to list all people I knew who had expressed any opinion
against Scientology. I had to detail all my friends; their jobs and
previous jobs and the communication I'd had with them since joining
Scientology; to list all the drugs and medicine I'd taken, when and
for how long; to give a complete sexual history, from the earliest
experience, of both heterosexual and homosexual activities and the
names of all involved, the number of times of the activity and any
perversions engaged in. I objected but was told the information was
totally confidential and would be used only by my counsellors to help
me. I do not believe this is the case.
ARREST
Then, as my assignment continued, there was a tip-off. I apparently
was followed one evening to the house of the producer of my program,
whose address already was noted by the Scientology "Special Affairs"
office.
When I returned to the Sea Org headquarters, I was left alone in a
room. It was there I saw a pile of photocopied documents marked
"strictly confidential". They included the names of some ex-members
who had been involved in litigation with the church. I wanted to read
the material and film it, so I put one of the papers in my bag.
Meanwhile, the "Special Affairs" director was filming my activities
with two concealed cameras. The police were called and I was arrested
for suspicion of theft.
As I left the building, the corridors were suddenly lined with
scientologists, some of whom photographed and videotaped me. I was
taken to the local police station and later released on bail. My main
fear was that the scientologists would get hold of my real name. It is
widely documented that people who have spoken out against the church
and its activities have been harassed. Although the police assured me
they didn't release my name, it wasn't long before the cult was
visiting my family in rural South Australia.
THE AFTERMATH
After my arrest, I rang my family in Australia to warn them the church
may contact them. I heard someone, claiming to be a journalist, had
called my former high school asking for information about my
background. He told my father I was involved in a cult and wanted to
help me. When my father refused to tell him anything, a woman visited
him the next day.
She admitted she was from the Church of Scientology and said I had
been arrested, that I would get a criminal record and never be able to
work again. She urged him to contact me and convince me not to proceed
with the program. Meanwhile, the man had been at my primary school,
masquerading as the husband of one of my friends, looking through my
school records. The campaign to stop the program from being aired
gathered momentum. This involved demonstrations and the distribution
of a Scientology magazine called Freedom. An article in Freedom
accused me and my producers of dishonesty, deceit, violating codes of
television journalistic ethics and committing criminal acts.
Everything built up to broadcast night. Predictably, Carlton TV had
many phone calls the evening the program was aired, complaining about
biased reporting. But one of the most telling things of all, was that
many of them were made before the broadcast even went to air.
CHARGES
After a protracted legal wrangle, charges for suspicion of theft were
dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service. The scientologists
unsuccessfully sought an injunction against the program going to air.
They also issued civil writs against me and Twenty Twenty, claiming
damages for trespass to goods, trespass and breach of confidences.
These proceedings have yet to be heard.
The Church of Scientology also issued summonses for "obtaining
services by deception". My lawyers applied to the London Magistrates
Court for a hearing to halt these proceedings.
The case hit the media spotlight. My lawyers argued the summonses
should be dismissed as they were issued solely to prevent the
broadcast of the program, to punish and embarrass the defendants for
making the program and to dissuade other journalists from publishing
any material critical of the church. The case ended in the withdrawal
of the summonses late last month, although the church still has the
right to appeal.
-sidebar-
Behind Scientology
Described as the study of knowledge, it was invented by the
science-fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard in the 1950s. Although innocent
on the surface, dealing with self improvement, the movement has quite
strange undertones. As a member moves up the various levels, by
completing courses, he or she discovers its belief in reincarnation.
When a member reaches the highly classified OT3 level (Operating
Thetan), he or she is ready to learn the secret of the history of the
universe, which is so powerful and dangerous that if one is not ready
for its revelation, it will result in their death. The revelation is
that billions of years ago, the Earth was called the planet Creteon
and the ruler of the galaxy, Prince Xenu, living in another galaxy
which was over-populated, sent some of his subjects to Earth, stored
them in volcanoes and blew them up with atom bombs. Their souls, or
"thetans" clustered together and now form us.
Source:
The Advertiser, Adelaide, Australia
October 7, 1995
October 7, 1995
Headline: "Inside the cult"
By Alison Braund
[Note: The
Scientology®
organization has at best estimate approximately
45,000 to 50,000 followers world wide -- contrary to the 8 million figure
that the organization has been claiming for the past few years or so.
While that number continues to drop (thanks in part to the Internet) few
of the remaining followers are even aware of the unending series of police
raids, indictments, and prison terms their leaders and fellow cultists are
subjected to routinely. Few are allowed to know about their organization's
criminal history, or its current racketeering activities. Even fewer of
the cult's remaining followers are privy to their messiah's written
policies which dictates the criminal behavior that keeps getting their
organization raided (see Xenu.NET for
suitable references of Scientology policy) Scientology management
is the problem, not the thousands of honest believers who are good,
honest citizens; themselves victims of Scientology - flr]
The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology organization through one of their many front groups. The name "Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank