Some Thoughts about Faith Healing
Stephen Barrett, M.D.
The notion that prayer, divine intervention or the ministrations of an
individual healer can cure illness has been popular throughout history.
Miraculous recoveries have been attributed to a myriad of techniques
commonly lumped together as "faith healing. During the past forty years,
several investigators have studied this subject closely and written
about their findings.
Louis Rose, a British psychiatrist, investigated hundreds of alleged
faith-healing cures. As his interest became well known, he received
communications from healers and patients throughout the world. He sent
each correspondent a questionnaire and sought corroborating information
from physicians. In Faith Healing [Penguin Books 1971], he concluded, "I
have been unsuccessful. After nearly twenty years of work I have yet to
find one 'miracle cure'; and without that (or, alternatively, massive
statistics which others must provide) I cannot be convinced of the
efficacy of what is commonly termed faith healing." [1]
During the early 1970s, Minnesota surgeon William Nolen, M.D., attended
a service conducted by Katherine Kuhlman, the leading evangelical healer
of that period. After noting the names of 25 people who had been
"miraculously healed," he was able to perform follow-up interviews and
examinations. Among other things, he discovered that one woman who had
been announced as cured of "lung cancer" actually had Hodgkin's disease
-- which was unaffected by the experience. Another woman with cancer of
the spine had discarded her brace and followed Ms. Kuhlman's
enthusiastic command to run across the stage. The following day her
backbone collapsed, and four months later she died. Overall, not one
person with organic disease had been helped. Dr. Nolen reported his
findings, which included observations of several other healers, in
Healing: A Doctor in Search of a Miracle , a book that I heartily
recommend [2].
C. Eugene Emery, Jr., a science writer for the Providence Journal, has
looked closely at the work of Reverend Ralph DiOrio, a Roman Catholic
priest whose healing services attract people by the thousands. In 1987
Emery attended one of DiOrio's services and recorded the names of nine
people who had been blessed during the service and nine others who had
been proclaimed cured. DiOrio's organization provided ten more cases
that supposedly provided irrefutable proof of the priest's ability to
cure. During a six-month investigation, Emery found no evidence that any
of these 28 individuals had been helped [3].
The most comprehensive examination of contemporary "healers" is James
Randi's The Faith Healers [4]. The book describes how many of the
leading evangelistic healers have enriched themselves with the help of
deception and fraud. Some of Randi's evidence came from former
associates of the evangelists who got disgusted with what they had
observed.
Randi's most noteworthy experience was the unmasking of Peter Popoff, an
evangelist who would call out the names of people in the audience and
describe their ailments. Popoff said he received this information from
God, but it was actually obtained by confederates who mingled with the
audience before each performance. Pertinent data would be given to
Popoff's wife, who would broadcast it from backstage to a tiny receiver
in Popoff's ear. After recording one of Mrs. Popoff's radio
transmissions, Randi exposed the deception on the Johnny Carson Show.
First he played a videotape showing Popoff interacting with someone in
the audience. Then he replayed the tape with Mrs. Popoff's voice audible
to illustrate how Popoff used the information.
Randi also exposed the techniques used by evangelist W.V. Grant, who
calls out people in the audience by name and describes their ailments.
Grant obtains this information from letters people send him and by
mingling with the audience before his show. To help his memory, he uses
crib sheets and gets hand signals from associates who also use crib
sheets. After one performance, Randi was able to retrieve a complete set
from the trash Grant left behind! Following another performance, Randi
found that some members of the audience had given false information
about themselves, their ailments, and their medical care. For example,
after "Dr. Jesus" had "put a new heart" into a man supposedly awaiting
open-heart surgery, Randi found that the details (including the doctor
and hospital named by Grant) could not be corroborated.
Grant's subjects typically are "slain in the spirit" and fall backward
into the arms of his assistants. In 1986 I observed from a few feet away
what happened when he encountered an elderly woman who did not wish to
fall backward when he touched her forehead. Grant pushed his fingers
into her neck so hard that she could not remain standing. I also watched
him "lengthen" the leg of a man who limped up to the stage, supposedly
because one of his legs was shorter than the other. The audience may
have been impressed with this feat, but I was not. Before the show
began, I noted that the man was one of Grant's assistants and walked
normally.
Intercessory Prayer
In 1988, two investigators reported that their thorough search of the
scientific literature had located only three controlled examinations of
the effects of prayer by third parties on people who were unaware of the
prayers. Of these, one (described below) claimed benefit but was poorly
designed, whereas the others found no benefit and were well designed.
Surprised by the small number of published studies, Witmer and Zimmerman
asked 38 journal editors whether they had ever received but rejected a
manuscript on the subject of intercessory prayer. They also asked the
editors to ask their readers whether they knew of any such study,
published or unpublished. No editor or reader responded affirmatively
[5].
The study most often cited as evidence that third-party prayer is
effective was carried out in the coronary care unit at San Francisco
General Hospital. The study compared 192 patients who were prayed for by
Christians located outside the hospital with 201 patients who served as
controls [6]. The published report stated that the prayed-for group had
fewer complications. However, the author's tabulation was not valid
because he scored interrelated complications separately and therefore
gave them too much weight. The average length of hospital stay, which
was not subject to this type of scoring error, was identical for the
treatment and control groups [5,7].
Is Anyone Helped?
Is there any evidence that faith healing works? The first step in
approaching this question is to specify what should be considered proof
that an ailment has been healed by a supernatural method. In my opinion,
three criteria must be met: 1) the ailment must be one that normally
doesn't recover without treatment; 2) there must not have been any
medical treatment that would be expected to influence the ailment; and
3) both diagnosis and recovery must be demonstrable by detailed medical
evidence.
If I wanted to demonstrate that I had an effective new treatment method,
I would take pains to document the basis for my belief. For example, if
I thought I could cure cancer with prayer, I would begin by making
certain that patients I worked on actually had cancer. I would obtain
their records, talk with their doctors, and have independent physicians
examine them to determine their current status. After administering my
treatment, I would conduct careful, long-range follow-up studies and
report the outcome in detail.
Has any "faith healer" ever sent for the medical records of a client? Or
had a client examined by a doctor before and after healing is
administered? Or inquired about a client's health months or years after
the healing? Or even kept statistics to indicate what percentage of
people with various ailments appear to have been helped? Or compiled
data that an independent investigator could verify? As far as I know, no
healer has ever done any of these things. On the other hand, many cases
have been documented in which people with serious disease have died as a
result of abandoning effective medical care after being "healed."
Thus, as far as I am concerned, there is no reason to believe that faith
healing has ever cured anyone of an organic disease. What about
functional ailments -- in which the symptoms are bodily reactions to
tension? Some people who visit "healers" may feel better because the
experience causes them to relax or because of a placebo effect. But any
benefit of this type should be weighed against the fact that people who
are not relieved may conclude that they are "unworthy" and become
depressed as a result. Money spent for a fruitless experience with a
healer is another negative factor.
Christian Science
A number of religious sects favor prayer over medical care. Christian
Science is probably the best known of these groups and is the only form
of faith healing that is deductible as a medical expense for federal
income tax purposes. Christian Science contends that illness is an
illusion caused by faulty beliefs, and that prayer heals by replacing
bad thoughts with good ones. Christian Science practitioners work by
trying to argue the sick thoughts out of the person's mind.
Consultations can take place in person, by telephone, or even by mail.
Individuals may also be able to attain correct beliefs by themselves
through prayer or mental concentration. "You can Heal," a pamphlet of
the Christian Science Publishing Society, states that "every student of
Christian Science has the God-given ability to heal the sick." Two weeks
of class instruction are required to become a practitioner.
The weekly magazine Christian Science Sentinel publishes several
"testimonies" in each issue. To be considered for publication, an
account must be "verified" by three individuals who "can vouch for the
integrity of the testifier or know of the healing." During the past few
years, believers have claimed that prayer has brought about recovery
from anemia, arthritis, blood poisoning, corns, deafness, defective
speech, multiple sclerosis, skin rashes, total body paralysis, visual
difficulties, and various injuries. Most of these accounts contain
little detail, and many of the diagnoses were made without medical
consultation.
As far as I know, no systematic, medically supervised study of the
outcome of Christian Science healing has ever been performed. However, a
recent study suggests that devout Christian Scientists, who rarely
consult doctors, pay a high price for avoiding medical care. The study
was performed by William F. Simpson, Ph.D., an assistant professor of
mathematics and computer science at Emporia State University. Dr.
Simpson compared alumni records from Principia College, a Christian
Science school in Elsah, Illinois, with records from the University of
Kansas in Lawrence, Kansas, and published his findings in the Journal of
the American Medical Association. Even though Christian Science tenets
forbid the use of alcohol and tobacco, the death rates among those who
had graduated from Principia between 1934 and 1948 were higher than
those of their University of Kansas counterparts -- 26.2% vs. 20.9% in
men, and 11.3% vs. 9.9% in women [8]. A subsequent study comparing the
mortality of Christian Scientists and Seventh-day Adventists (who also
are admonished to abstain from cigarettes and alcohol) found even
greater differences [9].
Rita and Douglas Swan, whose 16-month-old son Matthew died of meningitis
under the care of two Christian Science practitioners in 1977, are not
surprised by these statistics. Angered by their experience, she founded
CHILD, Inc., to work for legal reforms that can protect children from
inappropriate treatment by faith healers. She and a colleague collected
and reviewed the cases of 172 children who dies between 1975 and 1995
when parents withheld meducal care because of reliance on religious
rituals They concluded
* 140 of the deaths were from medical conditions for which survival
rates with medical care would have exceeded 90%. These included 22
cases of pneumonia in infants under two years of age, 15 cases of
meningitis, and 12 cases of insulin-dependent diabetes.
Information about CHILD can be obtained online or by writing to P.O. Box
2604, Sioux City, IA 51106.
Membership in the Christian Science Church has been declining steadily.
Since 1971 the number of practitioners and teachers listed in the
Christian Science Journal has fallen from about 5000 to about 1800, and
the number of churches has fallen from about 1800 to about 1300.
Is Spirituality Helpful?
A 1996 poll of 1,000 adults found that 79% believed that spiritual faith
can help people recover from disease [11]. This idea is also popular
among physicians. Although many studies have found associations between
various measures of religiosity and health, no well-designed study has
demonstrated that religious beliefs or prayer actually benefit health
[12]. In fact, one well-designed study found just the opposite. The
study involved patients whose progress was followed for nine months
after discharge from a British hospital. They evaluated the outpatient
records and the responses of 189 patients to questionnaires. the
researchers concluded that the health status of patients with stronger
spiritual beliefs were more than twice as likely to be unimproved or
worse [13].
Recommendations
Can anything be done about faith healing? Believers don't see it as a
problem, while most nonbelievers don't see it as a priority issue and
have little sympathy for its victims. But a few things might help lower
faith healing's toll on our society:
* Laws to protect children from medical neglect in the name of healing
should be passed and enforced. In states that allow religious
exemptions from medical neglect, these exemptions should be revoked.
Maybe the practice of faith healing on minors should be illegal.
References
1. Rose L. Faith Healing. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1971.
2. Nolen W. Healing: A Doctor in Search of a Miracle. New York, 1974,
Random House Inc.
3. Emery CE. Are they really cured? Providence Sunday Journal Magazine, Jan
15, 1989.
4. Randi J. The Faith Healers. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books,1987.
5. Witmer J, Zimmerman M. Intercessory prayer as medical treatment? An
inquiry. Skeptical Inquirer 15:177-180, 1991.
6. Byrd RC. Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a
coronary care unit population. Southern Medical Journal 81:826 829, 1988.
7. Posner G. God in the CCU? A Critique of the San Francisco Hospital study
on intercessory prayer and healing. Free Inquiry, Spring, 1990.
8. Simpson WF. Comparative longevity in a college cohort of Christian
Scientists. JAMA 262:16571658, 1989.
9. Comparative mortality of two college groups. CDC Mortality and Morbidity
Weekly Report 40:579582, 1991.
10. Asser S, Swan R. Child fatalities from religion-motivated medical
neglect. Pediatrics 101:625-629, 1998.
11. McNichol T. The new faith in medicine. USA Today, April 7, 1996, p 4.
12. Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T. Religion, spirituality and medicine.
Lancet 353:664-667, 1999. The full text of this article can be accessed
online by registering at the Lancet Web site and going to the contents page
of the Feb 20th issue.
13. King M, Speck P, Thomas A. The effect of spiritual beliefs on outcome
from illness. Social Science & Medicine 48:1291-1299, 1999.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
* 18 more had expected survival rates greater than 50%
* All but three of the remainder would probably have had some benefit
from clinical help. [10]
* Faith healing should no longer be deductible as a medical expense.
* Reporters should be encouraged to do follow-up studies of people
acclaimed to have been "healed."
* "Healers" who use trickery to raise large sums of money should be
prosecuted for grand larceny.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.