Over-challenged Super-Cops
The attack by the cyber-terrorists shows: the FBI is not up to
the task.
Zurich, Switzerland
by Erik Nolmans
FBI chief Louis Freeh has a flair for dramatic appearances.
One week after hackers crippled internet pages in Yahoo,
eBay and Amazon.com, he stepped up before the U.S. Senate
with a grim demeanor and demanded that the perpetrators be
punished as harshly as the organized criminals of the drug
cartels or the Mafia. He was also able to report on his first
great achievements: they were on the track of the
cyber-terrorists; investigations had already begun in 17 cases.
Freeh particularly stressed the deployment of his still new
special department against computer crime.
What the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
failed to mention was the fact that the first clues were not the
result of any detective work on the part of the computer
geniuses at the FBI. All the FBI had to do was answer the
telephone - the tips came from informants.
Just like back in the days of Al Capone and the gangsters,
when FBI agents slipped the shoeshine boy around the corner
a couple of bucks for a tip from the underworld, the U.S.
super-police of today still rely on the same, old-time
investigative equipment: a vast network of paid and unpaid
informants
This time the tips came from people who operated among the
hackers of the underground. "The FBI is not exactly
overburdened with internet gurus," commented U.S. news
magazine, "Newsweek." Fighting crime per denouncers rather
than per [internet] decoders appears to be the byword of the
day. In that manner, investigation turns into a matter of luck:
either the FBI has a tip which leads to solving the case or the
investigation comes to a standstill.
One situation that is typical for the state of the FBI: in the last
five years, mission areas for the elite cops have been constantly
expanding. Besides traditional areas like fighting organized
crime, terrorist attacks and drug traffickers, there is everything
from computer fraud and local police assignments up to
clarification of war crimes, like in Kosovo. 4,400 new agents
have been hired by the FBI in the last few years - an increase
in personnel of more than one third, making it the most
widespread reorganization in the history of the almost
100-year-old agency. Not to mention the budget was doubled
from 1.5 to 3 billion dollars.
The FBI's competency, however, has not kept up with its
growth. Because of the rapid expansion, there are many young,
inexperienced agents today. More than 40 percent of all FBI
agents have less than five years experience on the job. "A
dramatic reduction in experience level," the "USA Today"
newspaper recently warned. It often occurs that experience in
pounding the beat is the deciding factor in handling the case. "It
used to be we would always count on a few veterans to show
the new arrivals the tricks of the trade. Today we are losing
them," complained James DeSarno from the Los Angeles
office, which is the second largest office in the country after
Washington.
Since the beginning of the 1990s, failures and scandals have
abounded in the once illustrious agency. The FBI has been
having less success with spectacular investigations than it has
with painful revelations in the headlines. That ranges from
dubious methods, such as the signing of false arrest warrants
with which the cops wanted to accelerate their investigations in
Connecticut, to errors of stupidity, such as prematurely
releasing the name of a perpetrator in a bomb attack during the
Olympics in Atlanta in 1996. The security guard, Richard
Jewell, upon whom the FBI used tricks to coerce him into
signing a confession and whom it presented as perpetrator,
was innocent. Warnings based on test evidence from their
colleagues in a special laboratory in Washington that they had
"the wrong boy" were ignored.
The FBI's slip-ups have occasionally been fatal. The country
was shocked last year when it was revealed that the FBI,
contrary to it claims, had employed incendiary tear gas on
April 19, 1993 while it stormed a sect center in Waco, Texas.
The sect buildings burned to the ground - the tear gas had
possibly caused or accelerated the inferno. 80 people, 12
children among them, died in the flames. Secretary of Justice
Janet Reno and FBI chief Freeh mutually blamed each other
for the cover-up. Since then the two agencies have become
bitter enemies. At the high point of the mayhem, Reno had her
own police, the United States Marshals, carry out a raid on the
FBI headquarters to confiscate material. Freeh steamed with
rage.
Freeh also brushed President Bill Clinton the wrong way. The
fight with Reno and the agency's growth of power is said to
have made Clinton distrustful. Then, when Freeh did nothing in
the Lewinsky scandal to keep the FBI men who were assigned
to Presidential security in the White House from testifying for
special investigator Ken Starr, Clinton hit the roof. He
unofficially declared Freeh to be a persona non grata.
Clinton has not publicly taken steps against Freeh. That would
be too difficult: the FBI director is selected for ten years. That
protects him from political purges. For that reason, there is
now a cold war being waged between the White House and
the FBI headquarters: "No FBI director has been this isolated
from state government since the 1960s," "Newsweek" judged.
A large part of that is due to Freeh, who arrived in his office in
1993 as a bearer of hope. After lusterless William S. Sessions,
Freeh, the former street agent, successful Mafia hunter and
seasoned investigator - his colleagues called him "Mad Dog" -
was apparently the right man to lead the agency.
But Freeh, who had announced that he would clean arrogance
out of the FBI, did not keep his word. He sided with close
friends, like his former number two man, Larry Potts, despite
offenses - Potts helped in covering up facts about a shooting -
long enough so that the old accusations came back that
cronyism ruled in the FBI. Neither has Freeh been able to tear
down the traditional rivalries between the FBI and the CIA.
Freeh, report insiders, has had enough of the constant criticism
by the press. Nevertheless he does not intend to step down. At
least not as long as Bill Clinton is in office. His resignation
would give the President a chance at recommending a new FBI
director to the Senate. In that way Clinton could leave his
stamp upon the agency for ten years - a fear that bothers the
FBI chief more than the image of the most important police
force of the land.
The FBI
Uncontrollable Power
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, better known by the
name of FBI, was founded in 1908 by the then U.S. Secretary
of Justice Charles Bonaparte, a relative of Napoleon.
The Americans, though, associate the FBI less with the name
of Bonaparte than with that of J. Edgar Hoover, the
all-powerful FBI chief, who was director of the FBI for a full
48 years - from 1924 to his death in 1972. The agency was
re-organized in 1935 under Hoover and put on a professional
operating basis. The uncouth Hoover, however, also made the
FBI into a super-police force which often operated on the
fringes of legality and which turned into an uncontrollable
power of the state.
Mafia
Officially founded for the protection of state and society, the
FBI is said not only to have combatted Al Capone's keepers
of order, the Mafia and Arab and domestic terrorists. The FBI
has also located threats in the political arena: first the
communists, then the Nazis, and finally black civil rights leaders
and leftist revolutionaries.
Racism
Association of encroachments upon authority and racism has
been inseparable from the FBI for many years. Even though
Hoover's successors have brought democracy into the agency,
the now 11,400 agent colossus is still far beyond the bounds of
an elite force, which is how the federal agency likes to think of
itself.
---------
Unofficial translations of German media, For non-commercial use only
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
February 23, 2000
Facts
Recent events - http://cisar.org/trnmenu.htm
Informational publications http://members.tripod.com/German_Scn_News
Over 1000 articles sorted by date http://cisar.org/sortdate.htm
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.