Dutch Home Office Secretary avoids getting asbestos-poisoning from 'Deathwinds'
ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT alias DOT net>
10 Apr 2001
"Icee" <icee@chello.nl> wrote:
> I wrote to several port-authorities, docks, health-departments, 'The
The general impression prior to this was that some bribe money would change
hands and it would be over. This is probably true throughout the Dutch
Antilles. What is also true is that the cult must now forevermore fear the
possibility of even one honest official (like Lot), with the heart of a lion
and wit of a fox, to swoop down on them unawares and find possible other legal
problems with the ship, which are not so easily disposed of.
There are many reasons to want to sweep the asbestos problem under the rug, the
primary being, as the port authorities themselves complained, that most ships
before 1970 also have this asbestos, and that most ships docking there are from
prior to 1970. I imagine, though, that if this were the case, the cult ship
would simply brazenly sail into port and then begin kicking up a huge storm
about them being singled out for examination while pointing out all the other
ships in the very same dock which no doubt also contain asbestos.
They could
also, if they had done so, claim to have fully and properly sealed the asbestos
to make it safe. They didn't do this. They instead snuck in and out of port
by night. This is good. This reminds them that they are criminals who need to
sneak in and out of places because of their crimes. This forces them to watch
their backs. This may disillusion members who believe their cult has the full
support of society. This may cause them to break fewer laws and be more sneaky
about the laws they do break.
In short, whether or not it "works" in the sense of forcing them to clean up
this asbestos and probable other criminal violations of sea safety rules, or
else spend the rest of their tenure above the waves sneaking from port to port
like thieves or pirates.
All other ports on the death-ship's itinerary should be similarly informed,
especially if there are ports less corrupt at islands known for better ethics.
Many port authorities in these little governments are quite corrupt, however,
and it is probably difficult to find an honest port authority.
Nevertheless, they should spend their days in fear of an honest harbormaster
who will inspect the death-ship both for asbestos and for other possible
criminal activities. Scientology is a crime cult, and it is unlikely that
asbestos is the sole crime they commit aboard the Deathwinds. Indeed, they are
reputed to run a special super-secret RPF aboard the Deathwinds, where they
keep people prisoner who otherwise might spill knowledge too dangerous. Marty
Rathbun, for example, was imprisoned aboard the Deathwinds to re-brainwash him
back into the crime cult.
ptsc
Any text written by other authors which may be quoted in part or in full
within this coverage of this issue is provided according to U. S. Code
Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html If you're an author
of an article and do not wish to allow it to be mirrored or otherwise
provided on The Skeptic Tank web site, let us know and it will be
removed fairly promptly.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
> Gouvernment' and newspapers. I also took care to cc everybody I
> wrote preventing them being able to say that they had received
> nothing and therefore had not acted. Most of these people meet on a
> daily/weekly base socially and it became unavoidable for them not to
> answer, when La Prensa (newspaper) who had seen everybody
> cc'd in their own letter, asked them for comments.
> Several other people have written as well, but what triggered the
> whole story was when I and somebody else well-known in these
> newsgroups participated in an Antillean newsgroup and spilled the
> story and got the people interested enough to also send letters
> to several terminals.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.