Bombing blows away innocent marriage party
Bloody evidence of US blunder
Rory Carroll in Qalaye Niazi
Monday January 7, 2002
The Guardian
The attack on Qalaye Niazi was as sudden and devastating as the Pentagon
intended. American special forces on the ground confirmed the target and three
bombers, a B-52 and two B-1Bs, did the rest, zapping Taliban and al-Qaida
leaders in their sleep as well as an ammunition dump.
The war on terrorism came no cleaner and Commander Matthew Klee, a
spokesman at the US central command in Tampa, Florida, had reassuring
news: "Follow-on reporting indicates that there was no collateral
damage."
Some of the things his follow-on reporters missed: bloodied children's
shoes and skirts, bloodied school books, the scalp of a woman with
braided grey hair, butter toffees in red wrappers, wedding decorations.
The charred meat sticking to rubble in black lumps could have been Osama bin
Laden's henchmen but survivors said it was the remains of farmers, their wives
and children, and wedding guests.
They said more than 100 civilians died at this village in eastern Afghanistan.
Survivors lacked the bewilderment common to those who have been bombed,
because they had an explanation: a tribal rival had manipulated the
Americans into attacking Qalaye Niazi to further his political ambitions
in Paktia province.
The Pentagon said it had indications that senior Taliban and al-Qaida officials
were at the site and that two surface-to-air missiles were fired at the aircraft
during the December 29 raid. The bombs set off secondary explosions consistent
with stockpiled ammunition.
The Pentagon has produced no evidence that missiles were fired at the planes but
there was a stockpile. From the ruins of two houses yesterday spilled boxes of
Russian, Chinese and Iranian rockets.
Diehard Taliban and al-Qaida fighters are said to still rove Paktia and its
neighbouring provinces of Paktika and Khost, where a US soldier was killed at
the weekend. Qalaye Niazi's role seemed clear to Commander Klee: "You have a
known al-Qaida-Taliban leadership compound."
But survivors say they stored the ammunition six weeks ago on the orders of
retreating Taliban troops. When the regime fell they notified authorities but no
one came to collect the ammunition. "We left it. What else were we supposed to
do with it?" said Taj Mohammad, the village elder.
It was stored in two unfinished houses in a five-house complex six miles north
of the collection of mud-brick compounds which passes for Qalaye Niazi's centre.
The complex housed 10 families who grew wheat, apples and grapes, said Mr
Mohammad.
About two dozen guests had crammed into the three occupied houses for a wedding,
raising the number of occupants to more than 100, said the elder. The bombers
came early in the morning.
Precision-guided bombs vapourised all five buildings and a second wave an hour
later hit people digging in the rubble and, judging from hair and flesh on the
edge of three 40ft holes some distance from the complex, those trying to flee.
Two days later villagers with shovels and tractors extracted the remains. A
hand, an ankle, a bit of skull, sometimes an entire torso, and buried some in 11
graves, each said to contain several people, and relatives from Khost took some
for burial in the mountains.
Yesterday there were just human scraps and the carcasses of sheep, dogs and a
cow, circled overhead by two crows.
One villager said 32 died. The United Nations said 52, including 10 women and 25
children. Mr Mohammad said at least 80. Other villagers said 92. Staff at the
hospital in Gardez said 107.
Innumeracy, rapid burial, damage to bodies, propaganda, remoteness, they all
conspire to shred certainty in this and other bombings. It is no one's job to
count the dead.
The UN said its envoy to Afghanistan, Lakhdar Brahimi, will discuss Qalaye Niazi
with US diplomats. The Pentagon has shifted slightly from its initial certitude
and promised to investigate a raid which Donald Anderson, chairman of the House
of Commons foreign affairs select committee, denounced as a massive failure of
intelligence.
That civilians were present there can be little doubt. Taliban and al-Qaida too?
Survivors swear not. Yet there is little venom for the US. "They were given bad
information by bad Afghans," said Hinzer Gul, echoing neighbours.
Haji Saifullah, head of Paktia's shura, or tribal council, said: "Our local
enemies are delivering this information to the Americans that Taliban or
al-Qaida people are here and Americans just bomb without any search."
The finger was collectively pointed at Aghi Badshah Khan Zadran, 58, an
anti-Taliban commander who controls Khost province and is lobbying the interim
government to add Paktia and Paktika provinces to his fief.
Some tribal elders said he threatened to call in US planes against them if they
did not back him and that Qalaye Niazi was a warning. Mr Zadran, also known as
Pacha Khan Zadran, was also accused of wiping out rivals by triggering the US
blitz of a convoy of elders on December 20, which killed up to 65 people.
Mr Zadran's officials were spotted with US special forces who relied on him
because of his impeccable anti-Taliban credentials, said aides of his rival, Mr
Saifullah.
By his own account Mr Zadran is the most powerful commander in south-east
Afghanistan. He hails the bombing as accurate and necessary to purge terrorists
but says he has no idea where the Americans get their intelligence. He hotly
rejects the accusations of manipulating air strikes.
The allegations have rattled the prime minister, Hamid Karzai, who last week
summoned Mr Zardan to Kabul to discuss Qalaye Niazi. But supporters were
confident Mr Zadran would return home this week with his fief expanded to
include Paktia and Paktika.
"These allegations against him are nonsense. He is a democrat and pro-west.
The government will confirm his appointment by Tuesday or Wednesday," said
Amanullah Zadran, the minister for frontier and tribal affairs, and Mr Zadran's
younger brother.
Tribal politics tend to confuse even Afghans and one US official in Kabul
admitted it was impenetrable to outsiders, no matter how well briefed. "So
sure, mistakes happen."
Any text written by other authors which may be quoted in part or in full
within this coverage of this issue is provided according to U. S. Code
Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html If you're an author
of an article and do not wish to allow it to be mirrored or otherwise
provided on The Skeptic Tank web site, let us know and it will be
removed fairly promptly.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.