Catholic cardinal coddles the cops just like Scientology
5 Apr 2002
Garry <Garry_member@newsguy.com> writes:
Want to know why the LAPD and area law enforcemnent authorities refuse to
investigate or look into Scientology practices? Well consider the Catholic
Church in Los Angeles presided over by Cardinal Roger Mahoney, who has
consistently claimed in media statements and interviews that he is cooperating
fully with the police, but refuses to turn over the names of molester-priests to
the police, and the response of the LAPD? Kiss the Cardinal's Ass.
Tony "The Finger" Ortega provides a very interesting look at what's going on
behind Mahoney's frock in this week's NewTimes LA.
-=-
http://www.newtimesla.com/issues/2002-04-04/finger.html/1/index.html
From newtimesla.com
The Finger
Cardinal Mahony's cooperating with the cops, and informing
As told to Rick Barrs
Holy Spin Control!
Sometimes this digit's got to wonder if it's the only scribe in the City of
Angels that our pontiff of perversion hasn't snookered over the pack of
pedo-padres he's hiding under his gown.
The Finger means, it's nothing short of awe-inspiring to watch Cardinal Roger M.
Mahony play members of big ol' L.A.'s fourth estate for the same kind of
ink-stained suckers he used to double-deal back in his Stockton days.
Now, the L.A. Times, the Daily News and broadcast media have been bringing
Angelenos whatever news tidbits the archbishop of avarice decides to dribble
out. (See, the holy spin-control artist knows full well that you don't give a
pack of dogs all the steak scraps at once. They'll just be howling for more, and
you might get eaten. You keep them at bay by tossing one piece at a time into
the backyard.)
So here's what the mainstream media's told us: The cardinal's let go of six to
12 pedophiliac priests because he's decided to enforce his "zero tolerance"
policy against kiddie diddlers in dog collars that's been in effect since 1988.
Mahony's passing around a pamphlet to schools and churches warning officials to
be on the lookout for aberrant behavior by adults toward kids. The literature's
part of a $5.2-million settlement last year in a sex-abuse case involving a
pedo-priest in Orange County. Mahony's issued a letter to parish priests in
which he condemns pedophilia in the priesthood and admits he has, indeed,
dismissed "a few" problem priests. (Note that the number's gone from six to 12
to "a few.")
Mahony isn't complying with requests from the cops that the names
of the dismissed priests be turned over to them. The cardinal stated in a Mass
he won't release the names of the Father Feel-goods because it wouldn't be fair
to their victims, but that he'll release any "new" cases to authorities. (Before
we go on, The Finger's just got to ask archdiocese flak Tod Tamberg -- who's not
returning telephone calls from anybody who won't kiss the cardinal's cassock
these days -- just one little question: Under the bleedin' circumstances, what
kind of numbskull allows his boss to hold a first post-controversy public
appearance at a place named Our Lady of Refuge? Tod, couldn't you have suggested
another church -- any other church?!)
Finally, the Times tells us that L.A. police chief Bernard Parks has written to
Mahony requesting the names of the priests he's fired (known to readers of this
column as the Dirty Dozen) and that Mahony has responded: "Recently dismissed
priests who were in the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles Police Department have
been duly reported...They were prosecuted and served probation many years ago.
These cases are a matter of public record and known to your detectives."
The premier Roman Catholic cardinal in the United States (the man many Catholics
thought, at least until lately, had the juice to become the first American pope)
went on to say in his letter to Parks that while individual priests are required
under California law to immediately report child-abuse allegations, the church
has no such obligation.
OK, now read the last two paragraphs again because this is important.
Ready? If the legal system's already dealt with members of the Dirty Dozen, then
why can't His Freakin' Eminence simply recite their names and case histories to
the highest-ranking police officer in L.A.? What's the big secret, and why
shouldn't a man of God want to let the cops make sure the victims of child
abusers have gotten justice?
Talk about the devil's advocate! Plus, the Times failed to ask the $64 million
question: If said priests did their legal bits "many years ago," then why in the
name of Pope John Paul II did Mahony allow the felons to potentially prey on
Catholic faithful -- some of whom are children -- for all these years, only to
be "recently dismissed" in the wake of a scandal involving at least 80 priests
and several hundred victims in the Boston area that legal experts say will wind
up causing the church to sell property to pay off hundreds of millions of
dollars in legal settlements?!
Here's why: Mahony's covering his sainted derriere. He's masterfully
manipulating the press -- and law-enforcement authorities -- to minimize damage
to the L.A. archdiocese and to his hallowed legacy. Heaven forbid that he come
clean about the priests he's removed and be forced to auction off church
property here -- jeopardize the magnificence of his beloved downtown cathedral,
Our Lady of the Angels, when victims come forth and sue the church for failing
to protect them against sexual predators. Insiders say wealthy Catholics were
expected to pay for at least half of the new edifice. Will the mega-bucks
continue to flow if Cardinal Cashflow can't contain a nasty scandal?
The Finger wasn't waxing facetious when it said the question of why Mahony's
allowed convicted pedo-priests to possibly prey on his flock for years is the
$64 million one. Think about it: Mahony's empire could wind up paying that much
if just one victim of each of the, uh, 12 priests in question gets a settlement
matching the $5.5 million awarded in Orange County to Ryan DiMaria, the alleged
victim of ex-Father Michael Harris. Sexual-abuse counselors say the typical
pedophile strikes at least 75 times with multiple victims -- so even if each
victim gets just the $1.2 million that the L.A. and Orange County archdioceses
agreed to pay Lori Haigh -- who says she was molested between the ages of 14 and
17 by Father John Lenihan -- the liability figure could easily eclipse $64
million.
Better for Mahony to stonewall. He's got to figure that maybe he'll get away
with it, like he's gotten away with helping death-care giant Stewart Enterprises
sell expensive burial plans to the Catholic faithful; like he's gotten away with
spending what's approaching $200 million (critics say some of that money had to
come from the Stewart deal) for the all-but-completed cathedral in an
archdiocese filled with poor Latino parishioners. (Check out Ron Russell's cover
story on the Stewart deal at www.newtimesla.com It's linked to this column.)
And with the LAPD and District Attorney Steve Cooley's office in charge of
bringing the pious pedophiles to justice, chances are Mahony and his boys will
come away unscathed. Cooley sent a namby-pamby letter to the cardinal, in which
he offered his office's cooperation but didn't even ask for the names of the
predators. And get a load of this: Now the LAPD's telling this digit that Mahony
and the archdiocese are cooperating, even though they're still refusing to give
up the names.
Suddenly, The Finger's no longer allowed to discuss the LAPD's inability to get
the names of the dismissed padres with Captain Sharon Buck, who heads the
department's juvenile division that's running the church investigation. She said
she's been told that all information must now come from the LAPD's own spin
doctors (The Finger's term) in the public information office. Here's Commander
Gary Brennan's kid-gloves take on things:
"The way [the Cardinal's letter] was reported is unfortunate...Our detectives
believe they have a good working relationship with the archdiocese. They're
cooperating with us; I'll leave it at that."
But, but, but... how can you say the archdiocese is cooperating, Commander, if
they won't give you the names?!
"Well, initially the archdiocese had been unwilling to give us names, perhaps
because some cases were not in our jurisdiction. (Perhaps?!) Chief Parks
finalized our request in a letter, and then the archdiocese invited our
detectives to come over and talk. (How wonderfully polite! Did everyone enjoy a
cup of tea?) That's when they gave us [some new information on pedophilia among
the archdiocese's priests]. However, they didn't give us the names of the
dismissed priests or the number of priests they've dismissed."
Duh! Commander, does it take this damnable digit to tell the LAPD that Mahony
hasn't given anybody squat?! Or that the chief's living up to the Little Pussy
handle this appendage awarded him for (among a host of things) letting rogue
cops in the Rampart scandal off the hook? Why don't Parks or Cooley have the
balls to work up charges against Mahony and his hypocritical goons for
withholding evidence? The slicker-than-holy-oil prelate's simply throwing
law-enforcement authorities the same scraps of sirloin he's throwing the press.
Which should make citizens with children in Catholic schools feel really safe!
Here's living up to the LAPD credo: To protect (the cardinal and his cronies)
and serve (up more victims to priestly pedophiles).
Says Mary Grant, spokeswoman for the Southern California chapter of the
Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, who herself contends she was
abused by the aforementioned Father Lenihan, "Right now these perpetrators are
like a loaded gun pointed at the parishes and the community. We don't know who
they are, and based on the church's past pattern of hiding sexual abuse, I feel
there's no reason to trust that the archdiocese is complying with the law.
Cardinal Mahony's taking a position of concealing the identities of the
perpetrators, claiming that this will somehow do more harm to the victims --
which's absolutely ridiculous! Cardinal Mahony's doing what he's always done:
maintain unaccountability and fight all the way.
"He's concerned about the liability of the church," Grant continued. "He doesn't
want these perpetrators revealed because it opens the archdiocese up to victims
coming out of the woodwork. Child molesters almost always have multiple victims.
If he's just dismissed these priests, and they've been prosecuted previously,
and he put them back in parishes to be around kids, that's just unconscionable.
The chances of recidivism are almost 100 percent, and Cardinal Mahony knows
that. The Catholic church has treatment centers all over the country where they
send their pedo-priests for recycling. Then, they pump them back into the
parishes, and when they re-offend, the hierarchy acts as if they knew nothing
about it. The cardinal's stonewalling, and that's typical."
Anne Cox, who runs the Children's Protection and Advocacy Coalition based in
Sacramento, believes the up to 12 pedo-padres Mahony's admitting he let go
(funny, isn't it, that a Roman Catholic cardinal can't say exactly how many
priests he's booted out for pedophilia?) have got to be the tip of the iceberg
in an archdiocese with more than 1,200 priests. "[To pay off possible litigants]
the cardinal may have to sell his new church -- you know, Taj Mahony -- before
it's all over," Cox said.
In the case that resulted in the most recent settlement against the L.A. and
Orange County archdiocese, Lori Haigh, now 37, contends that Lenihan got her
pregnant when she was 16, told her to get an abortion and gave her money to do
so. She said she eventually told two other priests about the affair, only to
have one accuse her of lying and the other come on to her.
But Haigh got some justice from the Orange County court. Grant, who told The
Finger she was also molested by the same priest as a minor, wasn't as lucky. She
filed suit against the church in 1989 and settled out of court in 1991 for
$25,000 (pedophilia in the priesthood was only whispered about at the time).
Because the statute of limitations had run out, the case couldn't be prosecuted,
she was told. (The Orange County Sheriff's Department is investigating possible
criminal charges in the Haigh case against Lenihan, who's agreed to be
defrocked.)
The Finger heard alleged tape-recorded conversations between Grant and the
priest who abused her on a recent episode of the Montel Williams Show. The voice
that Grant identified as her abuser's could be heard admitting that he'd had a
sexual encounter with Grant when she was in her early teens, but that the
incident was as much Grant's fault as it was his.
Enough horror stories -- for now. The Finger believes time's of the essence.
It's up to the authorities to discover the identities of the priests that
Mahony's made a production of letting go. The fact that the cardinal's divulging
new instances of abuse by priests is of little consequence to the victims of the
Dirty Dozen. Even a cardinal ain't above the law, and Mahony can't be allowed
protect men who could be continuing to abuse children in some other line of
work. There's a reason that the law calls for sex offenders to be registered
with police -- somebody needs to make sure they aren't continuing to prey on the
innocent.
Any text written by other authors which may be quoted in part or in full
within this coverage of this issue is provided according to U. S. Code
Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html If you're an author
of an article and do not wish to allow it to be mirrored or otherwise
provided on The Skeptic Tank web site, let us know and it will be
removed fairly promptly.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Originally published by New Times L.A. Apr 04, 2002
the press, one table scrap at a time.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.