Gene Ingram, coke-dealing pimp of Scientology

Scientology Raided Around The World

ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT cryptofortress DOT com>
Gene Ingram, coke-dealing pimp of Scientology
04 Mar 2002

Database:                      LAWSUIT
Information Current:           01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998
Last Updated:                  02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis)
Filed:                         COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL
Case Number:                   A 365409
Filing Date:                   01-28-1981
                               CA
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
District:                      CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)
Court:                         CRIMINAL
Defendant(s):                  INGRAM EUGENE M
Penal Code Violation(s):       182.5
Penal Code Violation(s):       266.H
Penal Code Violation(s):       266.I
Defendant(s):                  WARD ROBERT
Penal Code Violation(s):       182.5
Penal Code Violation(s):       266.H
Penal Code Violation(s):       266.I

{ As a quick look at the law books reveals, this is the pimping/pandering/obstruction of justice business that got Ingram tossed off the LAPD. Ward and another defendant, of the last name of "Grunwald," both pled guilty. Only Ingram walked. }

{182. (a) If two or more persons conspire:

(1) To commit any crime.

(2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime.

(3) Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action or proceeding.

(4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or to obtain money or property by false pretenses or by false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform such promises.

(5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.

(6) To commit any crime against the person of the President or Vice President of the United States, the governor of any state or territory, any United States justice or judge, or the secretary of any of the executive departments of the United States.

They are punishable as follows:

When they conspire to commit any crime against the person of any official specified in paragraph (6), they are guilty of a felony and are punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for five, seven, or nine years.

When they conspire to commit any other felony, they shall be punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided for the punishment of the that felony. If the felony is one for which different punishments are prescribed for different degrees, the jury or court which finds the defendant guilty thereof shall determine the degree of the felony defendant conspired to commit. If the degree is not so determined, the punishment for conspiracy to commit the felony shall be that prescribed for the lesser degree, except in the case of conspiracy to commit murder, in which case the punishment shall be that prescribed for murder in the first degree.

If the felony is conspiracy to commit two or more felonies which have different punishments and the commission of those felonies constitute but one offense of conspiracy, the penalty shall be that prescribed for the felony which has the greater maximum term.

When they conspire to do an act described in paragraph (4), they shall be punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or both.

When they conspire to do any of the other acts described in this section, they shall be punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or in the state prison, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or both.

All cases of conspiracy may be prosecuted and tried in the superior court of any county in which any overt act tending to effect such conspiracy shall be done.

(b) Upon a trial for conspiracy, in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute the offense, the defendant cannot be convicted unless one or more overt acts are expressly alleged in the indictment or information, nor unless one of the acts alleged is proved; but other overt acts not alleged may be given in evidence.}

{ 266h. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), any person who, knowing another person is a prostitute, lives or derives support or maintenance in whole or in part from the earnings or proceeds of the person's prostitution, or from money loaned or advanced to or charged against that person by any keeper or manager or inmate of a house or other place where prostitution is practiced or allowed, or who solicits or receives compensation for soliciting for the person, is guilty of pimping, a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years.

(b) If the person engaged in prostitution is a minor over the age of 16 years, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years. If the person engaged in prostitution is under 16 years of age, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six, or eight years.}

{266i. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), any person who does any of the following is guilty of pandering, a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years:

(1) Procures another person for the purpose of prostitution.

(2) By promises, threats, violence, or by any device or scheme, causes, induces, persuades or encourages another person to become a prostitute.

(3) Procures for another person a place as an inmate in a house of prostitution or as an inmate of any place in which prostitution is encouraged or allowed within this state.

(4) By promises, threats, violence or by any device or scheme, causes, induces, persuades or encourages an inmate of a house of prostitution, or any other place in which prostitution is encouraged or allowed, to remain therein as an inmate.

(5) By fraud or artifice, or by duress of person or goods, or by abuse of any position of confidence or authority, procures another person for the purpose of prostitution, or to enter any place in which prostitution is encouraged or allowed within this state, or to come into this state or leave this state for the purpose of prostitution.

(6) Receives or gives, or agrees to receive or give, any money or thing of value for procuring, or attempting to procure, another person for the purpose of prostitution, or to come into this state or leave this state for the purpose of prostitution.

(b) If the other person is a minor over the age of 16 years, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years. Where the other person is under 16 years of age, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six, or eight years.}

****

{ Here's the Ingram Investigations one; note who is listed as the debtor. Ingram hides behind his wife, Regine Asher Ingram. }

Database:                      JUDGMENT
Information Current:           07-21-1986 through 01-26-1998
Last Updated:                  02-15-1998 (Updated on a WEEKLY basis)
Filed:                         JUDG-RECORDERS OFFICE
Filing Number:                 932522919
Filing Date:                   12-28-1993
Filing Type:                   JUDGMENT
Status:                        SATISFIED
                               02-07-1994
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
Filing Office:                 RECORDERS OFFICE
                               12400 E IMPERIAL HWY
                               FOR DOCUMENT ORDERING, CALL (800) 
                               777-8567 TO ORDER
                               ORIGINAL FILINGS AND OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS.
                               NORWALK 90650
Creditor:                      STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO
Debtor:                        INGRAM INVESTIGATIONS
                               845 W AVE 37
                               LOS ANGELES 90065
Debtor:                        INGRAM, REGINE

****

Database:                      LAWSUIT
Information Current:           01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998
Last Updated:                  02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis)
Filed:                         COUNTY CLERK CIVIL
Case Number:                   C358970
Filing Date:                   03-10-1981
                               CA
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
District:                      CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)
Court:                         CIVIL
Defendant(s):                  GATES DARYL
Defendant(s):                  MADELL JOHN
Defendant(s):                  LOS ANG CITY POLICE CHF
Defendant(s):                  LOS ANG CITY POLICE COMMR BD
Defendant(s):                  REITER LOUIS
Defendant(s):                  SPARKENBACH JOHN
Plaintiff(s):                  INGRAM EUGENE M

{ This is a lawsuit filed by Gene against Daryl Gates and John Madell, probably concerning his firing from the LAPD in the notorious pimping and drug scandal. Daryl Gates and John Madell were Police Chief and Police Commissioner respectively. I am not familiar with Louis Ritter or John Sparkenbach as yet. }

****

Database:                      LAWSUIT
Information Current:           01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998
Last Updated:                  02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis)
Filed:                         COUNTY CLERK CIVIL
Case Number:                   C326725
Filing Date:                   06-18-1980
                               CA
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
District:                      CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)
Court:                         CIVIL
Defendant(s):                  GATES DARYL F
Defendant(s):                  LOS ANG CITY
Plaintiff(s):                  MOUNGER DARRYL
Plaintiff(s):                  INGRAM EUGENE M
Plaintiff(s):                  MOUNGER SHARI

{ This is another case of Gene suing Daryl Gates. Also listed in this case is Darryl Mounger, who among being an attorney for Gene Ingram, was also Mark "N-Word" Fuhrman's attorney, and who specializes in defending corrupt LAPD cops against Internal Affairs. }

****

Database:                      LAWSUIT
Information Current:           01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998
Last Updated:                  02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis)
Filed:                         COUNTY CLERK CIVIL
Case Number:                   C394624
Filing Date:                   12-22-1981
                               CA
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
District:                      CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)
Court:                         CIVIL
Defendant(s):                  GATES DARYL F
Defendant(s):                  LOS ANG CITY
Defendant(s):                  LOS ANG CITY POLICE BD COMMR
Plaintiff(s):                  INGRAM EUGENE M

{ Yet another lawsuit by Gene against Daryl Gates. I bet there's some dirt in these files somewhere, considering the seamy nature of the facts at dispute. }

****

{ Hold your breath, here comes a big one. Eugene Ingram is listed as plaintiff in this humongous mass of back-and- forth cross-complaints between the cult and a bunch of Free Zoners, including Sarge Gerbode and the OTHER Ron Neumann, who was/is(?) a whopping great squirrel. I believe that this is the case where Helena Kobrin became a textbook example of a frivolous litigator. }

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1984 through 02-27-1996 Last Updated: 03-05-1996 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK Case Number: 382561 Filing Date: 03-10-1993 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: SAN MATEO Court: CIVIL Type of Case: CIVIL COMPLAINTS Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGEN M ET AL Date added: 04-13-1993 Defendant(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 04-13-1993 Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): NEUMAN RONALD ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CENTER FOR APPLIED METAP ETC Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): FRENCH GEROLD ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): NEUMAN RONALD ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): FRENCH GEROLD ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CENTER FOR APPLIED METAP ETC Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): NEUMAN RONALD ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): FRENCH GEROLD ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CENTER FOR APPLIED METAP ETC Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): NEUMAN RONALD ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CENTER FOR APPLIED METAP ETC Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CNTR APPLIED METAPSYCHOLOGY ET A Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): CHURCH OF THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH ET Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): FRENCH GEROLD ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Defendant(s): INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ETC Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): GERBODE FRANK ET AL Date added: 04-13-1993 Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF UNIVERSL TRUTH ET AL Date added: 04-13-1993 Plaintiff(s): CENTER FOR METAPSYCHOLOGY ET AL Date added: 04-13-1993 Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 05-13-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 06-10-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 07-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 08-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 10-11-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 11-15-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 12-21-1993 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF SF ET A Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint Plaintiff(s): INGRAM EUGENE M ET AL Date added: 01-11-1994 Comments: Cross Complaint

****

{ Right here are some "iffy" ones, things that are either just "Eugene Ingram" or "Eugene Eric Ingram" or (probably) unrelated Ingrams. }

****

Database:                      LAWSUIT
Information Current:           01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998
Last Updated:                  02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis)
Filed:                         COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL
Case Number:                   B 098124
Filing Date:                   03-10-1964
                               CA
State:                         CALIFORNIA
County:                        LOS ANGELES
District:                      CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES)
Court:                         CRIMINAL
Defendant(s):                  INGRAM CLARENCE EUGENE

****

{ This is a case involving a Eugene Ingram, a Harold Ingram, and a Thomas Theodis. Probably a different Eugene Ingram. }

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: A 156623 Filing Date: 06-19-1968 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: SOUTHWEST (TORRANCE) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE Penal Code Violation(s): 187.1 Penal Code Violation(s): 211 Defendant(s): INGRAM HAROLD Penal Code Violation(s): 187.1 Penal Code Violation(s): 211 Defendant(s): THOMAS THEODIS Penal Code Violation(s): 187.1 Penal Code Violation(s): 211

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: A 242460 Filing Date: 03-05-1969 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): HANZY CLIFTON Penal Code Violation(s): 286 Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE Penal Code Violation(s): 286

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: CR 273106 Filing Date: 04-24-1963 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE Penal Code Violation(s): H 11530

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: BA 084892 Filing Date: 05-09-1994 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE Penal Code Violation(s): P 451.D Penal Code Violation(s): P 455 Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE ERIC Penal Code Violation(s): P 451.D Penal Code Violation(s): P 455

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: BA 026019 Filing Date: 10-09-1990 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE E Penal Code Violation(s): H 11350

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CRIMINAL Case Number: BA 056338 Filing Date: 06-19-1992 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: CRIMINAL Defendant(s): BAYLOR GILBERT CONSTANIC Penal Code Violation(s): H 11351.5 Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE ERIC Penal Code Violation(s): H 11351.5

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CIVIL Case Number: REL181698I Filing Date: 04-16-1986 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Court: RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF SUPP Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE ERIC Plaintiff(s): BLACK T RHOSIA ELEEN

****

Database: LAWSUIT Information Current: 01-01-1980 through 01-22-1998 Last Updated: 02-05-1998 (Updated on a MONTHLY basis) Filed: COUNTY CLERK CIVIL Case Number: BY189043 Filing Date: 09-11-1996 CA State: CALIFORNIA County: LOS ANGELES District: CENTRAL (LOS ANGELES) Defendant(s): INGRAM EUGENE ERIC Plaintiff(s): LOS ANG CO

****

{ Many of these are other Eugene Ingrams, included solely for entertainment value }

[Note: The Scientology® organization has at best estimate approximately 45,000 to 50,000 followers world wide -- contrary to the 8 million figure that the organization has been claiming for the past few years or so. While that number continues to drop (thanks in part to the Internet) few of the remaining followers are even aware of the unending series of police raids, indictments, and prison terms their leaders and fellow cultists are subjected to routinely. Few are allowed to know about their organization's criminal history, or its current racketeering activities. Even fewer of the cult's remaining followers are privy to their messiah's written policies which dictates the criminal behavior that keeps getting their organization raided (see Xenu.NET for suitable references of Scientology policy) Scientology management is the problem, not the thousands of honest believers who are good, honest citizens; themselves victims of Scientology - flr]

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of Organized Crime Civilian Response®.

The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology organization through one of their many front groups. The name "Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.

Return to the Scientology Raided main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank