From: lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu (Leny Freeman)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Scope of Newsgroup and CCHR
Message-ID: <34455@usc.edu>
Date: 21 Jul 91 16:34:21 GMT
References: <1991Jul19.000100.16311@athena.mit.edu>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 20
Nntp-Posting-Host: phad.hsc.usc.edu

In article <1991Jul19.000100.16311@athena.mit.edu> portnoy@athena.mit.edu (Stephen L. Peters) writes: > [stuff deleted]

>If CCHR is trying to serve the public interest, why aren't they >trying to make changes in the FDA rather than just flaming?

It's not just for the sake of flaming but for public information. I for one would be less likely to trust Prozac after reading those articles. You've got to admit the information presented does bring up serious questions about the drugs benefit.

And how do you know they are NOT doing something else besides "flaming"?

> >"Could it be...oh I don't know......Scientology?" cute ha ha ha. > > Stephen Peters

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank