Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: Scientology information
In-Reply-To: deej@cds8613.Cadence.COM's message of 22 Jul 91 18: 01:50 GMT
Message-ID: <asbestos.22Jul91.xs2@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress)
Organization: Mathematics Department, University of Chicago
References: <GATELEY.91Jul19132355@helma.rice.edu>
	<1991Jul19.170332.6608@cadence.com>
	<1991Jul22.180150.17838@cadence.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1991 23:34:24 GMT

In article <1991Jul22.180150.17838@cadence.com> deej@cds8613.Cadence.COM (Jim Howard) writes:

>In article <GATELEY.91Jul19132355@helma.rice.edu>, gateley@rice.edu
>(John Gateley) writes:
>> Do I understand this correct? What this seems to say is that ALL
>> "mental healing" and "study of the mind" should be done in the context
>> of religion ONLY.

>  Exactly.  This topic has to do with the soul, and makes no sense (and
>can cause catastrophic effects on somone undergoing treatment) if
>approached from the angle that man has no (isn't a) soul.

Bullshit.  This logic holds *only* if we assume the existence of a
soul.  It's extremely circular.

--
asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu

Not that I see anything wrong with these views! No, sir!
I don't even *have* a sock drawer!
        --Dave Barry