Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: take the test
In-Reply-To: lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu's message of 22 Jul 91 19: 47:24 GMT
Message-ID: <asbestos.22Jul91.2374@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress)
Organization: Acme Flame-Resistant Systems
References: <5043@borg.cs.unc.edu> <55145@apple.Apple.COM>
	<7335@husc6.harvard.edu> <34485@usc.edu>
Distribution: alt.religion.scientology
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1991 04:22:19 GMT

In article <34485@usc.edu> lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu (Leny Freeman) writes:

>In article <7335@husc6.harvard.edu> adam@endor.uucp (Adam Shostack) writes:
>>Charles Manson was (amongst other things) a Scientologist, and OT-9.
>>So the OT-8 would flunk slightly worse than Manson.

>Charles Manson was never a Scientologist.  The author of Helter
>skelter admitted that he just added that in there when confronted by

Manson didn't write Helter Skelter; the Beatles did.

>church attorneys.  Also OT-9 hasn't even been released yet and OT-8

Released? What the fuck? You mean you have new, up-to-date versions of
moral perfection?

Geez.  Next you'll be telling me there are unannounced bugfix
releases, OT-8A, OT-8B, etc., like Microsoft does.

--
asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu

Not that I see anything wrong with these views! No, sir!
I don't even *have* a sock drawer!
        --Dave Barry