Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: take the test
In-Reply-To: lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu's message of 22 Jul 91 19: 47:24 GMT
Message-ID: <asbestos.22Jul91.2374@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress)
Organization: Acme Flame-Resistant Systems
References: <5043@borg.cs.unc.edu> <55145@apple.Apple.COM>
	<7335@husc6.harvard.edu> <34485@usc.edu>
Distribution: alt.religion.scientology
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1991 04:22:19 GMT

In article <34485@usc.edu> lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu (Leny Freeman) writes:

>In article <7335@husc6.harvard.edu> adam@endor.uucp (Adam Shostack) writes: >>Charles Manson was (amongst other things) a Scientologist, and OT-9. >>So the OT-8 would flunk slightly worse than Manson.

>Charles Manson was never a Scientologist. The author of Helter >skelter admitted that he just added that in there when confronted by

Manson didn't write Helter Skelter; the Beatles did.

>church attorneys. Also OT-9 hasn't even been released yet and OT-8

Released? What the fuck? You mean you have new, up-to-date versions of moral perfection?

Geez. Next you'll be telling me there are unannounced bugfix releases, OT-8A, OT-8B, etc., like Microsoft does.

-- asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu

Not that I see anything wrong with these views! No, sir! I don't even *have* a sock drawer! --Dave Barry

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank