From: mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Scientology information
Message-ID: <1991Jul23.170033.32237@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 91 17:00:33 CDT
References: <GATELEY.91Jul19132355@helma.rice.edu> <1991Jul19.170332.6608@cadence.com> <1991Jul22.180150.17838@cadence.com>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 48

In article <1991Jul22.180150.17838@cadence.com>, deej@cds8613.Cadence.COM (Jim Howard) writes: > In article <GATELEY.91Jul19132355@helma.rice.edu>, gateley@rice.edu > (John Gateley) writes: >> In article <1991Jul19.170332.6608@cadence.com> > deej@cds8613.Cadence.COM (Jim Howard) writes: >> The Creed of the Church of Scientology >> 18 February 1954 >> We of the Church believe: >> ------------------------- >> [...] >> That the study of the mind and the healing of mentally caused >> ills should not be alienated from religion or condoned in >> nonreligious fields. >> [...] >> >> Do I understand this correct? What this seems to say is that ALL >> "mental healing" and "study of the mind" should be done in the context >> of religion ONLY. > > Exactly. This topic has to do with the soul, and makes no sense (and > can cause catastrophic effects on somone undergoing treatment) if > approached from the angle that man has no (isn't a) soul. >

But "mental healing" and "study of the mind" are accomplished elsewhere in science, without even mentioning a soul. Neurosurgery, for example, requires an innate knowledge of most psychological mental processes in order to hit the right spots in the brain, but no mention of a soul is made to "aid" in the study. If mental healing can occur only in context of a soul, then how is it that atheists are able to benefit from hospital programs teaching visual imagery to "combat" their illnesses (such as: white knights attacking cancer cells, etc.). Often, the addition of a soul will only make things worse, as in the above visualization, where a person undergoing visualization treatment will perceive that their soul/self-will is currently failing, and therefore not respond as well to the treatment as someone who merely thinks of it as self-will. Also perception of a soul as being innately part of yourself and therefore unchangeable will hurt similar experiments from people who are devout <whatever> and refuse to allow the change as it was "decreed by Deity".

> > ~ deej ~ > deej@cadence.com > Jim Howard - (408) 944-7947 > Cadence Design Systems, Inc. >


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank