From: das9674@rouge.usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Message-ID: <35300@rouge.usl.edu>
>To sum up, this 'engram' stuff is a pervertion of the idea of
>natural law.
'Scuse, but what *is* the idea of natural law?
>People HAVE them, If you will, but they don't need to be 'fixed!'
Yes, I do believe I have some (and had). However, I'll thank *you* NOT
to say whether *I* need to have them fixed or not! I'd like to make my
own decisions about my mental health. And I have found that I have
benefited from having certain engrams 'fixed.'
>I'm just fine, thank you!
Good! Glad to hear that you feel that way. I do pretty well myself, but
I'd like to reserve the option to change.
Disclaimer: I'm just me, & my Word is not All.
--Elizabeth
--
The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
internet: bbs.oit.unc.edu or 128.109.157.30
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: Elizabeth.Mccoy@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Elizabeth Mccoy)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: This engram stuff smacks of original sin.
Message-ID: <4743@beguine.UUCP>
Date: 24 Jul 91 23:18:29 GMT
Sender: usenet@beguine.UUCP
Followup-To: Elizabeth.Mccoy@bbs.oit.unc.edu
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Lines: 25
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.