In article <1991Jul30.201224.32437@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>> Do you really think that if there was any merit to this 'visualization'
>> technique, it would not already have become widely accepted?
>It is currently being used, it has not gained wide favor because it has not
>been "scientifically" proven, and since it is a "whatever" force, it probably
>never will be. The whole process is simply another method of trying to cure a
Don't you see this as a problem? If it can't be proven, maybe, just
maybe it's not true.
>you speak of. Perhaps another paranormal force took his or her life, since
Oh, good. Next you'll be telling us it was a curse.
>there always seems to be a "time to go." It doesn't really help any to
>squabble with me over the effectiveness, since it works occasionally--and
>nothing else in cancer treatment has anything BETTER than *occasionally* for
Yes, and occasionally cancers just go into remission. Do you have any
evidence that this process works any better than waiting for that?
>>> "ki", "chi", etc., extended beyond the physical body).
>>
>> In the Western World, we call this force: "body odor".
>Doesn't cut it. Body odor only leaves bruises on the inner nose and throat,
>not on the outer body...
Not necessarily. Excessive body odor has been known to cause bruises
on the person emitting it. :-)
--
/=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\
| Francis Stracke | My opinions are my own. I don't steal them.|
| Department of Mathematics |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D|
| University of Chicago | Until you stalk and overrun, |
| francis@zaphod.uchicago.edu | you can't devour anyone. -- Hobbes |
\=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D/
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: francis@zaphod.uchicago.edu (Francis Stracke)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Psi and Scientology
Message-ID: <FRANCIS.91Jul31214704@daisy.zaphod.uchicago.edu>
Date: 1 Aug 91 03:47:04 GMT
References: <29880@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <1991Jul22.203524.5493@cadence.com>
<leo.680437603@galaxy> <1991Jul30.201224.32437@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress)
Reply-To: francis@zaphod.uchicago.edu
Organization: Mathematics Department, University of Chicago
Lines: 40
In-Reply-To: mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu's message of 31 Jul 91 01: 12:24 GMT
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.