From: mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Some views on Scientology
Message-ID: <1991Aug5.165829.32541@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 5 Aug 91 21:58:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: kuhub.1991Aug5.165829.32541
References: <h+9lzll@rpi.edu> <17184@life.ai.mit.edu><1991Jul24.140607.32251@kuhub.cc.ukan <CHRISTIR.91Aug3211923@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 27

In article <CHRISTIR.91Aug3211923@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, christir@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Christi) writes: > > > In article <1991Jul24.233541.27713@math.ufl.edu>, sgc@math.ufl.edu (Scott G. Chastain) writes: > > I would like to make a few comments but let me say at the onset to avoid > > obvious flames that:1) I have read Dianetics, 2) I have read and used > > Self Analysis, and 3) I have an open mind and would like to discuss > > the issue in a reasonable way. > > > > > but hubbard said he wasn't interested in open minds..... > > "When somebody enrolls, consider that he or she has joined up for the > duration of the universe. Never permit an 'open-minded' approach." > > c. >

Ahhh. So I can take it that Scientology isn't even going to tolerate Pagans and other non-Scientologists, unlike Christianity in which only fanatics currently pronounce Pagans=3DSatanism.

You guys just lost most of the remainder of my vote for Scientology. Just another, "This is the only way to the Ultimate Truth" religion...


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank