From: mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Some views on Scientology
Message-ID: <1991Aug5.165829.32541@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 5 Aug 91 21:58:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: kuhub.1991Aug5.165829.32541
References: <h+9lzll@rpi.edu> <17184@life.ai.mit.edu><1991Jul24.140607.32251@kuhub.cc.ukan <CHRISTIR.91Aug3211923@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 27

In article <CHRISTIR.91Aug3211923@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, christir@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Christi) writes:
> 
> 
>    In article <1991Jul24.233541.27713@math.ufl.edu>, sgc@math.ufl.edu (Scott G. Chastain) writes:
>    > I would like to make a few comments but let me say at the onset to avoid
>    > obvious flames that:1) I have read Dianetics, 2) I have read and used
>    > Self Analysis, and 3) I have an open mind and would like to discuss
>    > the issue in a reasonable way.
>    > 
> 
> 
> but hubbard said he wasn't interested in open minds.....
> 
> "When somebody enrolls, consider that he or she has joined up for the
> duration of the universe.  Never permit an 'open-minded' approach."
> 
> c.
> 

Ahhh.  So I can take it that Scientology isn't even going to tolerate Pagans
and other non-Scientologists, unlike Christianity in which only fanatics
currently pronounce Pagans=3DSatanism.

You guys just lost most of the remainder of my vote for Scientology.  Just
another, "This is the only way to the Ultimate Truth" religion...

Leo