In article <tiff.679946085@oahu>, tiff@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Tiffany Frazier)
very astutely observes:
> I know *nothing* about Scientology, but I carefully read each of
> these "tenets" (if that is the appropriate word?)... and noted a
> curious lack of mention of the female half of the population?
> Why is "sex" not included in the first tenet? It seems to me that
> these tenets, as written, pointedly exclude women.
**************************************************************************
In articles <1991Jul22.175707.17047@cadence.com> and
<1991Jul24.170241.22922@cadence.com>, deej@cds8613.Cadence.COM
(Jim Howard) writes:
> Women have the same rights as men within Scientology.... There do not
> need to be any Amendments to state this, as it has always been this way.
In article <17181@life.ai.mit.edu>, whatis@pogo.gnu.ai.mit.edu
(Steve Boswell) writes:
> I have never even seen a HINT of discrimination.
In article <4744@beguine.UUCP>, Elizabeth.Mccoy@bbs.oit.unc.edu
(Elizabeth Mccoy) writes:
> As far as I know, the only silly woman-based recommendation that LRH
> ever promoted (though not as one of the religious texts) was the silly
> notion that women shouldn't breast-feed....
**************************************************************************
Jim, Steve, and Elizabeth have evidently overlooked the following
passage in L. Ron Hubbard's book _Scientology: A New Slant on Life_
(1965), Chapter 9 "A Woman's Creativity", page 52 in my copy:
"... a society in which women are taught _anything but_
[Hubbard's italics] the management of a family, the care
of men, and the creation of the future generation is a society
which is on its way out.
"The historian can peg the point where a society begins
its sharpest decline at the instant when women begin to take
part, on an equal footing with men, in political and business
affairs, since this means that the men are decadent and the
women are no longer women.
"This is not a sermon on the role or position of women; it
is a statement of bald and basic fact."
I'm quoting somewhat out of context (the chapter as a whole is in
praise of women's social role); but it's nonetheless clear that L. Ron
Hubbard was an egregious sexist.
Mark Israel
I have heard the Wobble! userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: L. Ron Hubbard was an egregious sexist.
Summary: was Re: Scientology information
Message-ID: <1991Aug8.064116.12676@cs.UAlberta.CA>
Date: 8 Aug 91 06:41:16 GMT
References: <4744@beguine.UUCP>
Sender: userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca
Reply-To: userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel)
Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Lines: 50
Originator: lnds@sherlock.mmid.ualberta.ca
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.