You describe a person who would lie to "save people from themselves"?
*sigh* I know someone moderately like this... It's not ethical, no
matter what rationalization/justification the guy uses, and if he was
really getting proper auditing the auditor should have caught it and
"handled" it. Pity you didn't "turn him in" -- people remember the
unethical of a group longer then they remember the nice clerk who
mentioned something favorable about the same group.
Re: Number of idiot-zealots.
Well, go looking up the number of fanatics (martyrs) that sprang up when
the XIan Church was setting up. Scientology is a rather "new" religion,
and the fanatics haven't gotten tired of it yet. And due to the tech
helping people be more effecient, they're *real effecient* obnoxious
fanatics! :-(
"Handle" you? Not with a ten-foot-pole, my friend! Explain that I think
you met what should be an atypical example (I would hope it is, but if
not, it should be), and ask you to not judge the religion by the
fanatics, maybe -- but I don't want you for a convert! :-)
--Elizabeth
Disclaimer: I am but human, not even Clear, & my Word is not All.
--
The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
internet: bbs.oit.unc.edu or 128.109.157.30
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: Elizabeth.Mccoy@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Elizabeth Mccoy)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: A Call to True Scientologists
Message-ID: <5026@beguine.UUCP>
Date: 8 Aug 91 23:21:44 GMT
References: <1991Aug6.194259.285@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu>
Sender: usenet@beguine.UUCP
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Lines: 27
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.