In article <5818@email.sp.unisys.com> paulr@email.sp.unisys.com (Paul Raulerson) writes:
>
>Now I have one question to ask: Why is it in this news group, that
>the *pro* scientologist folks are being polite and trying to provide
>evidence of their cause, and the anti-scientologist folks are being
>nothing if not hostile?
>
>From an outside viewpoint, that speaks loads. And not in favor of
>the anti-scrientologist crowd either.
>
>-Paul
>
I more or less agree with your assessment, and I'm one of the
anti-scientology folks. I do not post negative comments about
Scientology because it is a religion/philosophy. I believe that
L. Ron Hubbard and the CoS have rooked and manipulated people to
no end. That pisses me off. It's possible that people do get
some help from Scientology, but many are being ripped off in a
big way.
Read Jon Atack's _A Piece of Blue Sky_. The unsavory nature of the
church is revealed in full.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Melnyk rmm@ipac.caltech.edu
Infrared Processing and Analysis Center
JPL/Caltech
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: rmm@baldwin.ipac.caltech.edu (Mike Melnyk)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Scientology: a comedy in 3 acts
Message-ID: <1991Nov8.014923.17852@cco.caltech.edu>
Date: 8 Nov 91 01:49:23 GMT
References: <1991Nov5.204745.23713@agora.uucp> <5818@email.sp.unisys.com>
Sender: news@cco.caltech.edu
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 28
Nntp-Posting-Host: baldwin.ipac.caltech.edu
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.