---

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Kamchatka Charlie
Subject: Re: Scientology: a comedy in 3 acts
Message-ID: <1991Nov8.194421.2635@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu
Organization: Lansing Area (Mich)
References: <1991Nov5.204745.23713@agora.uucp> <5818@email.sp.unisys.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 91 19:44:21 GMT

Paul Raulerson writes, bias fixed on outward view:

>Now I have one question to ask: Why is it in this news group, that >the *pro* scientologist folks are being polite and trying to provide >evidence of their cause, and the anti-scientologist folks are being >nothing if not hostile?

Since when is one person's telling his experience with Scientology hostile? Just because he didn't "Bow Down In Awe And Reverence To The Name Of The One And Only True Master Of The Devine And Earthly Sciences" the first time he went into the Scientologist storefront church, does that mean he is an enemy of God and "Those Who Are Enlightened?" And just because he went in the second time to protect his friends, does that mean he's "A Spawn Of Satan Meant To Kill Off Those Who Wish To Seek Out And Find The One And Only Truth As Revealed By L. Ron Hubbard?" His experiences have been reported in numerous magazines and books, most notably Time Magazine and 60 Minutes. In each of the reports, the numerous law bending and breakings, intimidation and rubbing out of "Enemies Of The Religious State," high cost for the "purifications," the continuous addition of higher levels for those higher up, reports of excessive richness and excessive paranoia of those on top of the Scientologist heap, and lies about his past life (which seems to get better and better with every retelling--HMMMM...)--hardly the beneficent religious group these boys desparately wish to expose to us.

>From an outside viewpoint, that speaks loads. And not in favor of >the anti-scrientologist crowd either. We make the scientologist answer to inaccuracies and falsehoods in their beliefs, does this make us raving lunatics? What if we just shut up and let them spread their "religion" over the world. Will the world be a happier place then? I THINK NOT. Ask them why they give a "Watered Down" version of Scientology to John Travolta. Ask them why their levels of awareness is based on money, not sincerity or truthfulness. Ask them "Who buys ALL your books?" Then read up on the other literature (NOT the stuff the Scientologists give, but other viewpoints) and THEN defend their actions against us. Don't just call us raving lunatics, prove us wrong if you can. Good luck doing so--you'll need it.

########################## # Kamchatka Charlie # # Net.address due Dec. 1 # ############################################## # I've been playing devil's advocate so long # # I'm getting personal visits from him. # ##############################################

---
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank