From: das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: What's so Scientific here?
Message-ID: <1991Nov9.033839.18528@usl.edu>
Date: 9 Nov 91 03:38:39 GMT
References: <1991Nov6.213823.1249@usl.edu> <z9d_k3+@engin.umich.edu>
Sender: anon@usl.edu (Anonymous NNTP Posting)
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana
Lines: 17

Well, I did read the 'you suck' beginning section of Dianetics.  It came off
to me as a quack's ramblings.  None of this psycho-analytical drivel makes any
sense.  Just because some guy says <such and such> about how he thinks people
think, does mean it is truth.  Don't be so gullible.

Why not respond to this instances which I originally noted in my first 
article? They made to bulk of it. They sure don't shine well on the 'science'
in Scientology, if you know what I mean,....

-Dan
.

--
********************************************************************************
*Daniel Anthony Stephenson       Is a cat's urinary tract health important?    *
*Univ. of Southwestern LA        My daddy loves me so much he bought a Volvo.  *
*das9674@usl.edu                                                               *********************************************************************************