Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: davidb@caen.engin.umich.edu (David Bonnell)
Subject: Re: A few definitions
Message-ID: <12f_AY-@engin.umich.edu>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 91 17:29:16 EST
Organization: The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
References: <JLd_YFB@engin.umich.edu> <1991Nov9.114625.4752@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>

In article <1991Nov9.114625.4752@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, amorgan@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Crunchy Frog) writes:
> In article <f8d_N2_@engin.umich.edu> davidb@caen.engin.umich.edu 
>   (David Bonnell) writes:
> >In article <1991Nov6.034657.4605@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, 
>   abb3w@fulton.seas.Virginia.EDU (Arthur Bernard Byrne) writes:
> 
> ..... stuff deleted .....
> 
> A friend of mine has been rather vocal in his criticism of Scientology.  He
> has received death threats.  These are, in case you didn't know, illegal.
> 
> There are a number of cases of people attempting to reveal corruption in the
> highest levels of the 'Church' who have had their lives threatened.
>
> 'The most law abiding organization on this planet'?  Get real, you are
> neck and neck with the KKK for last place.
 
It is very interesting that you so strongly state below that I should give
evidence for my claims when you have none for yours!  Find someone else to
slam for fun.  
 
> ... lot's more deleted
>
> I have read Dianetics.  I find more substance in the average Flat Earther
> publication.  If Dianetics is such hot shit, if clears can do all these
> amazing things, it should be dead easy to prove it.  I *can* be convinced
> that you have something.  Half-assed assertion won't do it though
> (regardless of the number of exclamation points you add).  Why not
> present us with some evidence?
>
>	Alan Morgan

As soon as you prove your claims I will be more than happy to demonstrate mine.