The 'Safe Asks Papers' -- Clearsound Tape Omissions
Clearsound Tape Omissions

It's Safe to Ask

Copyright © Safe -- <>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:01:19 -0800
Subject: Clearsound Tape Omissions

> RUNNING CCHs (Level 1 tape)
> A lecture given on 22 June 1961
> SHSBC-18 renumbered 20, of 22 Jun 61, Running CCHs
> [rerecorded by St. Hill]
> [75 min long]
> [Checked against the old pre-clearsound academy cassettes,
> material missing from the clearsound version is marked ">"]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ENTIRE FIRST SECTION WAS CUT >>>>>>>>>
> [This entire opening section was cut, up to the point marked
> with >>>> below. For easier reading, we did not mark each line.]
> Got a piece of interesting news today. The Explorer's Club just
> awarded me flag number 163 for the Ocean Archeological Expedition.
> [applause]
> Some of you are wondering "What's this expedition? Yeah,
> what's this expedition?"
> Well, a long story, but in 1950 a fellow named Palmer walked
> into the Explorer's Club just as I was leaving the mailroom
> and Palmer says to me, he says "Hey Ron, You want an expedition?"
> And I said "a ... sure." (laughter)
> And he said "Well, there's a whole bunch of Greek and Roman
> statuary that was being brought from Athens to Rome and the
> ship went aground on the North side of the Duo-decanies,
> and its been there ever since and they just located it in about
> thirty fathoms of water," he says, "And nobody's having anything
> to do with it until we have permission from the Greek government
> and so forth, and we called the thing and we're getting it all
> organized and everything was going along fine, and all of a sudden
> the government of Ecuador - " he was in an awfull rush, "The
> government of Ecuador has just grabbed all of us to explore the
> hinterland of Ecuador." And that's always a very juicy activity,
> you know, when a South American government tells you to explore
> the hinterland because they pay you. And that is almost unheard
> of. And they actually pay you by giving you a half a million square
> miles of headhunter-ridden jungle or something of the sort.
> But anyhow, he was on his way and he was picking up a couple of
> fellows instantly and as a matter of fact they were walking into
> the club and they had - despite the mustaches they looked very
> Ecuadorian and they were seeing him to settle these affairs.
> Well, anyhow, this fellow threw all of his papers and so forth
> with regards to this expedition in my box at the club. And
> two days later I was just about to put my hand in and recover
> them when May 9th occured, 1950. That was an interesting day.
> It was publication day of Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental
> Health.
> I want to call something to your attention. It's eleven years
> later. There's 11 years more algie accumulated on this statuary.
> And I haven't had a breather, haven't had a breather at all. It
> doesn't take very long. It doesn't mean that I would be vastly
> absent for any lenght of time. Actually what you do is you take
> the sunny stormless period of the year, which is not necessarily
> summer as anyone in the West Indies will tell you, and you take
> a run down and get your feet wet, let the diver get his hose
> snagged on the coral, you know. Do what you gotta do, survery
> it and lay it out, and next year you go back, push it around a
> little bit further and then you happen to find out that Alexander
> the Great's Wall of Tyre is very interesting, you see. So you drop
> down and see what's happening there and you accumulate various
> things. We have now accumulated the Maritime Museum at Greenwich -
> is now one of our boosters, and the Museum of the United States
> Naval Academy at Anapolis is one of our boosters, and we're
> accumulating left and right, and actually the nephew of Round
> The World Slocum - you heard him round the world single handed
> in a twenty-eight foot boat, Slocum. Well his nephew is a Royal
> Navy retired captain, so he has now joined this ship's company.
> This kind of thing starts snowballing, you see.
> And all you do is innocently lift your head and say "I think I
> will go on an expedition." And you've said it. Actually it doesn't
> take very much time. You decide, you see, that an expedition or
> something that people disappear into small igloos for six months
> at a crack or something like this. This isn't the way it goes at
> all. I call to your attention there are aircraft these days which
> put you in the area where your people have been working getting
> things ready, and put you in the area on a Tuesday, you see, and
> you can pull out from that area on a following Wednesday and you
> keep up with it pretty closely.
> Anyway, we have a ship, a hundred and eleven tons wind screw
> desiel schooner, that I have rebuilt on paper now into an
> expeditionary vessel. Arguing with the United States Coast
> Guard as to whether or not its a scientific ship or a yacht
> and whether or not it can remain to be a yacht and still be used
> as a scientific ship, and almost ready to throw up my hands and
> fly the Panamanian flag if not the Jolly Rodger. [laughter]
> I've just been sort of working on this in my spare time,
> not that I have quite a bit of that, and getting it together.
> Nothing very dramatic in the way of progress. We hit these
> dramatic points because you have to be pretty well accredited
> or reputed in order to get accredation on an expedition. They
> don't give that to every body.
> The Explorer's Club hadn't written me and hadn't written me and
> hadn't written me. They had me right there at wait on the pre-have
> scale. And I finally wrote them a letter to ask them if my letter
> had been lost or something of the sort or if I had been taken
> out of the files or something and just today, why their delay was
> explained. They had already put it before the flag comittee and
> the board of directors and that sort of thing, so the expedition
> as of that action it became an official scientific expedition -
> Ocean Archeological Survery with the purpose of discovering
> various periods of marine history in the past as possibly represented
> on the floors of sunken harbors which had long since passed from
> the view of man where there are, of course, still ships. And
> I don't guarantee that we wouldn't stop by on some of this stuff
> sunk here in World War II and pick up some tommy guns. (laughter)
> But anyhow, an expedition of this character does get a sort of
> lonely activity, because people are always spinning the idea that
> you might bring up the Crown jewels of Ophir or something of the
> sort. No telling what might happen. Anyway the wide blue horizon
> opened up and there it is and I just thought I would tell you about
> it.
> Ever see the Exporer's Club flag?
> [noise, voices]
> I've got it upside down. There it is.
> [voice in background, unintelligible]
> Yup. Now this flag is not in bad shape. It was just carried by
> Waldo Smith on his expedition into the Belgian Congo just
> before the recent difficulties.
> My old flag - I've pinned it up there on the bulletin board for
> you to see - is reported to me to be in such a state of dishebile
> that it couldn't be issued to ... [laughter] - which is absolutely
> true. Hurricans are only supposed to go about a hundred miles an
> hour, but that particular flag was flying all through in a hurricane
> that was blowing a hundred and eighty five miles an hour at
> anchorage - that was really rough.
> All right, well I've probably used up the tape ration on you.
> But anyway there's the tale about it. Thought you might be
> interested.
> I don't always have my attention on the hot brains, don't always.
> But actually, although I do other things, neither do I let them
> get in my road. All right, I keep my job up. Try to anyway.
> Now, understand that you are probably going through a number of
> catastrophies, probably have run into some imponderables and I
> wish to tell you somewhat amusedly that Johannesburg has found
> a new way of running the CCHs. You just sit there and pump
> somebody's hands for many hours hoping there will be a reaction.
> I have a hint for that area, they should read the bulletin.
> They got one guy on a course that isn't progressing, in spite of
> the fact that they are running for hours and hours and hours and
> hours on CCH 1 with no reaction so Routine 1 isn't working.
> [comment from audience - unintelligible]
> Oh no! Well, a three hundred word cable has just gone out. We
> insulated the telex up here. Actually the cable is pretty articulate,
> it hardly gibbers at all. [laughter]
> Now ... [clearsound begins "All right" taken from above, and
> then continues with next word below]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> END OF CUT SECTION >>>>>>>>>>
> [All right]. I'd better cover the running of the CCHs just
> for fun, just for fun, just as an amusing activity that, of
> course, has no relationship to anybody that's ever going to
> make a mistake - particularly here.
> **Rest of lecture snipped
> ----------------------------------------
> SHSBC-113 ren 119 20 Feb 1962 (Level 2 tape)
> [Clearsound checked against old reels. This lecture has
> many omissions in the clearsound version. The omissions
> are marked ">".]
> (60 min)
> > OK. You have, by the way, seen an example of sec checking
> > on rudiments, as opposed to prepchecking, and you had three
> > or four rudiments live on the other session, the first session
> > you saw, you remember that? The earlier session, same pc.
> > And the auditor just swept these by grandly - you remember -
> > and you gasped with horror - you remember gasping slightly
> > with horror?
> >
> > And today you saw me handling them with sec checking, and
> > going in and straightening up every rudiment or trying to,
> > and bypassing prepchecking. We never got to prepchecking,
> > did we? We never got to our business at all. If it is
> > all right with you Fred, we will now ask the pc.
> >
> > You understand, this is not preordained particularly - it
> > just isn't taped so as to give you and example of which is
> > which - it just turns out that you now have an example of
> > which is which.
> >
> > All right, which session gave you the most gain, Fred?
> >
> > Fred: The first one.
> >
> > The first one. We handled the whole ruddy lot with
> > prepchecking, didn't we? And in the other one we never got
> > any auditing done to amount to anything. Go ahead and tell
> > them what you told me at the end of the session about having
> > the areas confused.
> >
> > Fred: Well - you'd asked me about the withhold on something -
> > had to do with money, and I had three different areas, you
> > notice, the Center Theatre, The American Theatre Association,
> > a big area there, and this area here. And I wasn't sure about
> > which area the withhold was in. And on Thursday, in prepchecking,
> > coming around to "What about such and such", the number one
> > question - every time you came around to the number one question,
> > I knew where I was. I could locate myself kind of on the track,
> > and what are we working on together here. I knew where I was
> > every time the number one question came around. We got a new
> > number one question, we had it narrowed down to one area and
> > cleaned that up before we went on to something else. This time
> > I wasn't sure and like I say - well gee - where? you know? what?
> > Something like this.
> >
> > Okay, All right, good enough.
> >
> > Okay, you see this? Well we learn what we learn. That was
> > not scheduled to teach you these two things. You should
> > understand these are live sessions, they're not demonstrations.
> > You learn what you learn out of something like this. Of course
> > I feel silly when I don't get a pc pressed on forward.
> > I didn't intend actually to run into this much crash on this,
> > and frankly an hour or an hour and fifteen minute session is a
> > very short session for me. I normally will audit three to five
> > hours in a session. And I'm having to scale my sessioning down,
> > see, and that's a demonstration.
> >
> > Frankly, it it my opinion after this session, that the
> > more you monkey around with rudiments except for havingness
> > why the less auditing you're going to get done. That's just
> > what we sort of meet. That does not apply to 3D criss cross,
> > but we've got prepchecking now, and it is a highly precise
> > activity, and I don't think that sec checking even vaguely
> > compares to it. That's my opinion. I couldn't get it off
> > the launching pad. If we'd gone on auditing, I would've given
> > him a break and said "Well none of this is clear, none of these
> > things are null". I would've given him a break and we would've
> > had a cigarette. I would've brought him back into it and started
> > a new session. See? I would've ended that session and started
> > a new session instantly, and I would have swung right into the
> > rudiments. "All right, this one's live and this one's live",
> > I would've told him, see? And then I would've come down on
> > prepchecking and I would've said "Well, what about money?", or
> > "What about taking money?" or "What about this subject?",
> > because this seemed to be the subject we were on. And then I
> > would have gone ahead and cleaned it up by area and type of
> > withhold and so forth, and I would have cleaned it up properly.
> > But I was trying to clean that up with the who and the when,
> > if you will notice, just who and when, and man it didn't spring
> > did it? So scrub it. It didn't spring. If I can't do it, I can't
> > expect you to. Okay?
> >
> > There's no substitute, apparantly, for just full dress parade,
> > clean zone, troups to colors, prepchecking. Get a zero, proceed
> > from the zero, go to your one. Proceed from your one to your
> > one sub one. You know? Whatever it is. There's no substitute
> > for it.
> >
> > I've run a couple of sessions since I was that ... Well, I ran
> > another session particularly, I was just standing on my head. I
> > could've been sitting there knitting, like the children's tutor
> > does, teaches in school without strain.
> >
> > This requires no strain on the auditor. This puts quite a strain
> > on the auditor. You don't know where you are going. And this
> > other ... I ran a 3 and a half hour prepcheck session, terrific
> > numbers of withholds blowing off the line, just giddy, there was
> > nothing to it - Sunday night. I woke up ready to go to a dance
> > There wasn't anything to this on the auditor. Okay?
> >
> > Do we have ... Peter, is that ... that's all right ...
> > Oh, we didn't put that demonstration on, did we? Oh you
> > did, well three cheers, that's a good experience, that's a
> > good experiment, thank you, thank you very much.
> >
> All right. This is Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
> What's the date?
> Audience: 20th.
> Thank you. What's the month?
> Audience: February.
> Oh, thank you. What's the year?
> Audience: A.D. 12.
> A.D. 12. All right. All right. We will let you away with
> that. Thank you very much.
> > Special Briefing Course Saint Hill, and we have some
> > new students in our midts. We have some new students
> > in our mitt. And I think you actually should ...
> > We shouldn't introduce some of these. (laughter). Well,
> > here's the one we can introduce: Hazel Booker, stand up!
> >
> > And Essie Shaefer, stand up!
> >
> > And somebody we're glad to see, you haven't seen for a long
> > time, Jim Skeleton, stand up!
> >
> > And here are two students that I must empathize - I'm very
> > glad to see here and were ... we let them on in spite of their
> > HDA, HCA classification, (laughter), and so forth, but we did
> > let them on course, so you be kind to them, and that's Jan and
> > Dick Halpern, stand up!
> [later on in the lecture]
> Hm. God, man. Well, you don't have to clean it up in one
> session, but you have to make sure that you've got another
> session.
> > You notice that I had about two or three rudiments banging
> > there in that demonstration today and even "missed a withhold"
> > is banging and the pc didn't spit at me, because the pc
> > knows I know that they're missing. The pc knows I know
> > where we're going on this sort of thing - has confidence
> > in me.
> [yet later on still]
> But anyway ...
> > As you get this straight across the boards, we find that
> > a hundred trillion years ago, why ...
> Well, let's take an example.
> > We had it mentioned in session today.
> [even more later]
> > I'll give you an example out of your session today.
> > We had two or three periods of explanation when I wasn't
> > doing prepchecking. In view of the fact that I wasn't doing
> > prepchecking, I of course could never get to the bottom of
> > it. I was just crippled, you see, because I couldn't slide
> > in the What. Because, during rudiments I was avoiding Whats
> > and I certainly wasn't prepchecking, I was sec checking -
> > doesn't work.
> -------------------------------------
> Lots of Squirreling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> I don't think they (RTC) like the fact that LRH said Sec Checking
> doesn't work... on a Level 2 tape that teaches how to sec check.


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank