Copyright © Safe -- www.fza.org
<Safe@scientology.at>
Hi Fellow Scientologists,
Squirreling within our church is apparently running rampant. The favorite
type of squirreling seems to be OMITTED and MISSING data. Let me give a
summary of what I've found so far;
If you can think of any more omitted data, alter-ises, please post it or
email me.
It seems that "covert" and "hidden" is the
watchword. What tone level is this indicative of whoever the SP's
are within our ranks? How long are we going to stand around and let
LRH works get lost, altered, and importance's get shifted with
"wrong emphasis's?"
WHO is the source and ultimately responsible for allowing/making the above
happen?
New Scientologists (especially) can't spot what's happening because they
never knew what WAS before. Apparently many older Scientologists haven't
bothered to compare. But there are many informed Scientologists that ARE
aware but have lost hope because they think our church is in major SP's
hands.
So how long can this alter-ising gradually happen without the subject
eventually getting destroyed? If you don't think there isn't a serious
attempt to destroy AUTHENTIC Scientology, you better look again harder.
All is NOT well and PUBLIC Scientologists need to be honestly told what is
really going on. We just cannot allow MISSING data anymore. BOTWO books are
starting to run rampant with no indication of who the writers are. Are we
just going to keep getting more numb and accepting to "new",
"improved" editions of LRH's original books? How can this be
acceptable? WHO is promoting this idea?
You remember Ron talked about "lost technology" in depth in
the study tapes? Well you're witnessing it LIVE and living it now.
This major squirreling is NOT going to stop unless all are made aware and
very watchful from here on out. It's up to US, ultimately the PUBLIC
Scientologists, to make sure things run straight within our own church.
I've pointed this data out as clearly as I know. Now, what are you going to
do about it? Keep it hidden from other Scientologists? Or let them know we
have a problem so maybe something can be done about it?
If just one person writes a report on this, it's going to get
"deep-sixed" because it gets drowned in that same PTS/SP
environment that CAUSED the problem. I've tried and NOBODY listened.
But perhaps if 1,000's of all Scientologists write KR's on this, it may get
handled in a serious way. We just can't ignore this.
Will you take the "easy" way out and remain more comfortably
blind to this? Or are you going to do something about it and keep
Scientology working?
Yours for keeping authentic LRH works in existence,
Safe
--
-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)
"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the
eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative".
"Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."
-- Lord Justice Sedley
David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!
For the truth about who controls CofS, go to:
http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: theta88008@my-deja.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:04:07 -0800
Subject: "Hidden" CofS, Inc. Squirrels Busy!
"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most
dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that
could most easily defeat us."
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.