Archive Message - 1995

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From!!!!!!uunet!!!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!is2.NYU.EDU!spurgeon Mon Jul 10 17:02:21 1995 Path:!!!!!!uunet!!!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!is2.NYU.EDU!spurgeon From: (Keith Spurgeon) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Chris Miller: Lay it to Rest Date: 8 Jul 1995 23:19:33 GMT Organization: New York University Lines: 53 Message-ID: <3tn3q5$7q4@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> References: <3rnr2r$> <3sknu0$> <3sq0v4$> <> <3t4jl7$iqd@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <3timai$> <3tl0v6$5mc@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <3tmpn0$> NNTP-Posting-Host: X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Chris Miller ( wrote: : (Keith Spurgeon) wrote: : > As I have said elsewhere in this group, I didn't care a bit about : >Co$ until they started cancelling messages, : Messages which were illegally copying information were cancelled. So : you codone illegal actions, eh? Who is the individual who did the cancellation, if it was legal and justified? Why don't they stand up and take credit? I do not condone copyright infringement. That has not been proven. Neither do I condone unauthorized forged cancel messages. I have seen evidence of that with my own eyes. Several of the messages recently cancelled were reposted. At least one of these included only a couple of paragraphs of Co$ material with several paragraphs of commentary. This cancel cannot be justified, if unauthorized forged cancels ever are (and I doubt that). : > While a full answer, with explanations, may not raise your : >credibility, it is your only chance to do so. : I don't seek credibility from someone who supports illegal activities. You are the one directly supporting illegal activities. I am against unauthorized forged cancel messages. I have not been repeatedly demonstrated as a prevaricator in this group. I am not one of the rabid flamers (though I enjoy some of them). I have tried to be rational and get answers from you about your smear of Morrison and Foerster. Chris Miller ( is a member of the Church of Scientology, which is engaged in litigation against Dennis Ehrlich. Ehrlich is represented by Morrison and Foerster (MoFo) on a pro bono basis. Chris Miller ( posted a message to soc.women claiming that s/he had a daughter who had been hired by MoFo. S/he made unsubstantiated allegations about MoFo and claimed that s/he was therefore concerned about his/her daughter's well-being. When questioned about this post on alt.rec.scientology, Chris Miller ( produced no evidence for his/her allegations agains MoFo and claimed that some details in the post had been changed to disguise his/her identity. After many weeks of Miller's unresponsiveness to the questions posted on alt.rec.scientology, many have come to believe the post to soc.women was a fishing expedition to dig up information that can be used in a dirty tricks campaign against MoFo. I'm one of them. keith


Return to The Skeptic Tank Alt.Religion.Scientology Archives Master List
Go to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank