Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!castlsys.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail Mon Jul 17 09:48:29 1995
Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!castlsys.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: stevea@castlsys.demon.co.uk (Steve)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: e-meter used co$ in schools ?
Date: 13 Jul 1995 16:21:48 +0100
Organization: Castle Systems Ltd: systems designers to the gentry
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <3u3dmc$aij@castlsys.demon.co.uk>
References: <3tlmq1$31n@unlisys.unlisys.net> <3tt90c$2maj@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: castlsys.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Some time ago, I posted a question on this subject. I wasn't prepared
to believe that Scientologists would perpetrate their tech on
innocent children without *some* sort of proof. These messages from
the AOL forum would seem to go some way towards providing that proof.
I can't really say why I feel the way I do about this, but my sense
of moral revulsion at these self-satisfied descriptions of how adults
are performing routines/rituals/procedures (call them what you will)
associated with a brainwashing cult is only marginally less than if
these posters had been boasting about how they had sexually abused
their children.
I find the whole thing repulsive and abhorrent.
Diane Richardson (referen@ibm.net) wrote:
> tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) wrote:
> >Is the e-meter (or any wheatstone bridge device with another name) used
> >in co$ schools ? This topic was started some time ago, but did not
> >really get explained.
> Tilman, you might be interested in the following thread which appeared
> on AOL:
> _______________________________________________________
> Subj: Auditing Kids
> Date: 95-05-11 09:03:14 EDT
> From: MRiversong
> In the Child Dianetics book, it seems like you don't audit children
> much. are there specific Scientology processes just for kids? Tech
> Bulletins on the subject? a girlfriend has a 4-year old son, she got
> beat up a couple times while pregnant, which is why i'd like to know
> more.
> _________________________________________________________
> Subj: Re:Auditing kids - Ref
> Date: 95-05-11 09:29:08 EDT
> From: DynamicDan
> In "The Second Dynamic" book, starting on page 265, there are many
> processes for children. I have used some on my children when needed
> and they responded and got the relief they sought.
> Remeber to keep worksheets of your sessions.
> DynamicDan
> __________________________________________________________
> Subj: Re:Auditing kids
> Date: 95-05-11 21:26:39 EDT
> From: DanJab
> You might also check with your local org. My son was audited at CCNY
> when he was between 1 and 2 years old. He also received auditing at
> Mace Kingsley, in Clearwater.
> The wins you'll have as a parent will be amazing!
> ___________________________________________________________
> Mace Kingsley is an Applied Scholastics school. I believe there were
> more posts regarding auditing in "Church"<spit> of Scientology[tm]
> schools, but I didn't bother keeping them.
> I wonder how they got the toddler to hold still and hold the cans?
Steve
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support Dennis Erlich! Send cheques (any currency) labelled DENNIS ERLICH
DEFENCE FUND to: Carla Oakley/Katie Walsh, MORRISON & FOERSTER, 345
California St, San Francisco CA 94104-2675 Tel (415) 677-7700
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, ronartistr - sent in your cheque yet?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQBVAgUBMAU6CvsT8zz+lqiRAQGsagIAqUOtnAHnb49JAeTk0c91bFscNSiepCVf
OpY9TSu5QzBF5L1bgpzfYcI2TVQ2NPcYo8PD7GmBjM1z3d/1AThFZw==
=5xIj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----