11h-tml> The Skeptic Tank: Alt.Religion.Scientology Archive Message - 1995
Archive Message - 1995

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch!darwin.clas.Virginia.EDU!dc7v Wed Jul 19 09:29:03 1995 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,comp.org.eff.talk Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch!darwin.clas.Virginia.EDU!dc7v From: dc7v@darwin.clas.Virginia.EDU (Damon Chetson) Subject: Re: The Noose is Tightening on CoS (was Big Suprise - 79K) (LONG) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: darwin.clas.virginia.edu Message-ID: <DBtIwp.39J@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Followup-To: alt.religion.scientology,comp.org.eff.talk Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <3u4mk8$n09@utopia.hacktic.nl> <noringDBpqJz.M72@netcom.com> <DBq3nJ.DwK@ceco.ceco.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 16:53:12 GMT Lines: 33 Xref: news.interserv.net alt.religion.scientology:76296 comp.org.eff.talk:57030 R. Urban (a#urban@ccmail.ceco.com) wrote: [regarding Cult of Scientology] : This is not intended to start a flame war, but you need to have more : tolerance for beliefs that are different than your own, particularly : those that are shared by minorities. Then don't post such garbage. : (In case you are wondering, I was : born and raised a Catholic.) And, if we don't protect the religious : freedom of the minority, then the religious freedom of the majority will : eventually be jeapordized. : Regardless of whether or not you agree with your neighbor's choice of : religion, if you are hell bent on destroying it, sooner or later the rest : will suffer like domino's falling. The discussion on alt.religion.scientology, for the most part, does not deal with the substance of the religion. If people want to believe in Xenu and in talking to animals and commanding plants to do their bidding, then by all means, they can believe that. What we object to are the tactics employed by the Cult of Scientology to suck people in and suck them dry of money. This isn't a question about religion. It's a question about coercion and torture and the ability of people to criticize a church unmollested. Maybe you should find out a little about the discussion on alt.religion.scientology before flaming. I'm going to delete your 3rd rate analysis of history below so you aren't embarrassed too much.


Return to The Skeptic Tank Alt.Religion.Scientology Archives Master List
Go to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank