Scientology GO/OSA cultist Russell Shaw plans to attack the Internet:
[Note: The Scientology crooks did just this (search The Skeptic Tank's
web site for the word "sporgery" at http://www.raids.org/search/
for a list of web pages which describes these attacks.) - flr]
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 1995 06:38:59
I think I may have a solution that can work for everybody.
When I asked for help in getting the graffiti spraying to stop, you
guys held back. One even posted that you folks *knew* a way to stop
it, but would not tell me.
Now, I understand that I am a net newbie, but let me run this idea by
you. I want the graffiti to stop. You have your free speech rights.
If you were doing what you are doing in private e-mail, I would not
know (or care). I just don't like the endless stuff that gets
repeated here that is vile and false.Solution: I send a request
uplines in the church for an official worldwide Call to Arms. We want
each Scientologist with a computer and a modem to post their success
stories to *every* newsgroup that has any sizeable amount of black PR
being posted.
The Scientologists would need to be notified of which newsgroups and
their net address. The Scientologists would not need to read any of
the existing posts on those newsgroups, as they can see all the
success stories they like, at their local org.
Now, I'm not talking about paltry 100-200 posts a day. I'm talking
about ENOUGH of the success stories to really "paint over" all of the
graffiti. If a particular newsgroup had 100 negative posts a day
going to it, then we would need to post at *least* 2000-3000 success
stories a day to that newsgroup.
To make sure that *our* stuff is on an "equal footing" with the black
pr stuff, each Scientologist posting would need the names of the
current threads and only use those names for their subject headers.
These would change from month to month, so there is a bit of admin
involved, but I'm certain it can be done.
To ensure that a negative sysop does not kill file the theta posts,
the success story posters could post from anonymous remailers. They
might need to change the anonymous remailer site they posted from
once in a while to ensure that their posts got through, but this could
be handled (again, with a bit of organization)
What I envision is that every newsgroup that has significant entheta
posts getting ENOUGH theta posts to completely cancel out thenegative.
I could be way off on the numbers. It might take 9000-10,000 posts a
day to some newsgroups to do the job. But if that is what it takes,
then that is what it takes.
This would be a real opportunity for Scientologists everywhere to
contribute, without really spending a lot of time. When I consider
how much Scientologists like to help and how little of their time this
would take, I see real possibilities. There are probably enough
Scientologists in Los Angles alone to do this, but I see it as a world
wide cooperative effort amongst the group. Plus, I like the
international idea.
What is now ars (or other similar newsgroups) could become large e-
mail groups. You guys can enjoy your free speech, and I get the
graffiti to stop.Naturally, this is just my idea at this point, and
there may be something I have not considered.
If the church did endorse the idea, it would be a great PR move too.
The broad press releases about how Scientology success stories (and
selected texts like What is Scientology) were available at no charge
on the internet.There are details of course; , like someone to monitor
all net newsgroups for selected words (Scn, C of S, Hubbard, etc.) to
see if there were new places that needed some success stories.
This is just a rough outline of my plan, and I know it needs a lot of
polishing. As there are a lot of people here who know considerably
more about computers and the internet than I, please feel free to post
your input on this idea.I welcome the assistance. I want to work this
out.
Sincerely, Russell Shaw
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: WONDERFULR@aol.com
Subject: GOOD NEWS ON ARS
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.