Even though the world won the battle against the Nazi fascism of Germany,
there are those working in America who wish to make that struggle a vain
one. That's because we never won the fight against religious bigotry.
Here you will find information about one of the more evil purveyors of
hatred and bigotry in America: Bob Larimer. This time it isn't the Jews
which are destroying the world (at least not yet, hey Bob?) His particular
fear is of homosexuals. Because of his problem he seeks to impose the
pathology of his fear and hatred upon millions of innocent
people around America.
A research assistant summed-up this bigot best:
He's currently president of Washington For Traditional Values (an offshoot
from the Washington Citizens' Alliance and once stablemate of Lon Mabon's
Oregon Citizens' Alliance.)
He also has a number of front groups including NOPE (which is fighting
equal protection for gay people in the workplace and credit provision and
housing and public accommodations.)"
There's an understatement. As you review the contents of this bigot's
bizarre, insane ranting against Initiative 677, you can't help but
notice the Nazi propaganda machine in motion again.
To provide further background into the hate rhetoric people like Bob
sell to their fellow Christian followers, I've attached some primary
examples of the homophobe propaganda and statements of hate.
I would like to point out before hand that I'm constantly reminded that
these people do not represent real Christianity and that it is a
very difficult task to maintain the perspective of that knowledge.
Toward that end if I offend Christians -- real Christians -- along
the way, I not only apologize before hand, I would like to solicit
comments on where the offense is so that I may correct it.
The N.O.P.E. (No Official Preferences in Employment) Committee to Defeat
Initiative 677 Announces:
Dr. Martin Luther King's niece, Alveda King, is coming to Seattle,
Washington to oppose Washington's homosexual initiative.
The bigot also lies with the name of his hate group: NOPE. There is no
"official preference" at issue here. There is a drive for
equality for all. I-677 doesn't grant special recognition of any sexual
orientation whatsoever. Typical hate-mongering rhetoric.
Civil rights leader Alveda King will participate in a Seattle news
conference on September 10, along with N.O.P.E. committee Spokesman Bob
Larimer, to oppose a Washington state ballot measure giving special legal
standing, protections and rights in the workplace based on wide-open
definitions of "real or perceived" sexual orientations.
Alveda King was recently in California standing with internationally
acclaimed black pastor E. V. Hill and more than one hundred of Los
Angeles' black ministers in opposition to similar legislation elevating
homosexual behavior to "civil rights" status. While in
California, King expressed outrage that 'sexual preference' is being
equated with skin color. King stated: "By inserting this behavior
into civil rights law, the true meaning of civil rights is destroyed."
Black skin and one's sexual orientation are something people are born
with. It's not a choice or a "lifestyle" as homophobic bigots
would want their followers to believe.
King is a veteran civil rights leader. She has participated in nonviolent
sit-ins with her uncle and father during the peak of the civil rights
movement. Her home has been firebombed due to her activities.
Alveda King is the founder of King of America, Inc. She is also a member
of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change; and
she is a former Georgia state legislator.
For more information, call N.O.P.E. at: 360-850-1272.
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:15:58 -0700
Do you really think I'll waste time bandying words with someone who is
comfortable calling people "lunatics?" I have a campaign to
run. [1]
Your notion of "celebrating diversity" appears to be hurling
epithets at those who dare to exercise their freedoms as Americans to
disagree with you. [2] Wonderful tolerance, there. [3]
Bob Larimer
[1] Yes, Adolf Hitler also had "a campaign to run."
[2] As if homophobic, hate-filled rhetoric (which gets innocent people
beaten and murdered) is "just another opinion." Adolf Hitler
also had "just another opinion."
[3] The irony would compel laughter were Bob's evil not so deadly.
Fri Sep 12 18:47:18 1997
bl> Do you really think I'll waste time bandying words with someone who
<laughing!> Neat. You have all the time in the world to demonize
millions of innocent people who do no one harm and yet you have no time
to answer for your religious hatred. Just demonize then run and hide:
That's your style.
Your publicly-stated ideology of hatred and bigotry is observationally
evil and yet you want to pretend that you can ignore the hurtful truth
just because your 14'th century hatred brands you a lunatic.
YOU contacted ME and mistakenly exposed your
hate-spew. Since your gods don't exist, now you must answer to
me for your evil.
Lose the hatred, Bob. Lose the Christianity. I can help you escape from
that evil you've fallen into but you've got to ask for help.
The charter of the Skeptic Tank expressly forbids offering unsolicited
assistance. If you're looking for courage to escape, check out:
And just walk away.
bl> Your notion of "celebrating diversity" appears to be hurling
Your brand of evil gets innocent people killed. Your evil is what Adolf
Hitler advocated. Your evil is covered in the long and bloody history of
your fascism.
My pointing out the hatred of people like you harms no one. Of course it
makes your type upset, resentful, and angry to have your bigotry and hatred
rubbed into your noses.
Or do you want to pretend that intolerance is beautiful like your fellow
neo-Nazi fascists Randall Terry and David Duke?
Well? Answer the question, bigot.
bl> Wonderful tolerance, there.
Your hatred and bigotry remains unchecked. I have no tolerance for bigots
who wish to reintroduce the Dark Ages. When you're ready to walk away from
that hatred and evil, however, please let me know, okay? I can help you.
Thanks in advance.
fr> Why haven't you answered me?
It seems you fascist Nazis must be brow beat before you'll break your
embarrassed silences, huh?
THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA by Jay Alan Sekulow
Aloha kakahiaka kakou.
This "report" comes under the heading "Know Thy Enemy"
and is undoubtedly the biggest crock of propaganda I've seen in a long
time. It only underscores Sekulow's true profession: schlockmonger. Any
other subshyster would be too embarrassed to put his or her name on this
crap, but not Jay Alan Sekulow, chief counsel to Pat Robertson and our
loving "friends" at the
Christian Coalition.
The American Center for Law and Justice
The Homosexual rights movement is like a runaway train racing down a
mountain pass. For several decades, this train has been gaining stream,
but it was not until the last few years that its speed began to increase
exponentially. The train is still largely out of sight, so most people
are unaware of the destruction that is headed their way. But if you listen
closely, you can hear the train approaching. It is coming closer with each
passing day.
In this confidential report, I expose the homosexual agenda for what it
is: a runaway train bent on destroying our communities. I want you to
know where that train is headed, and what it will do to our society if it
runs it course. I want you to be able to recognize it so you'll know when
it comes to your community.
There's one more thing. I want to show you what you can do to help stop
this train before it destroys our families and the very foundation of our
society.
/s/ Jay Alan Sekulow
The homosexual rights movement is engaged in a concerted effort to
radically alter the definition of marriage, and thereby of the family,
in America. This is their ultimate goal. Everything else--the equal
protection movement, the push for benefits to gay partners, the education
agenda, and the fight for same-sex "marriage"--must be
understood in this context.
Homosexuals are not only out of the closet, they are out to destroy the
family as we know it. The evidence for such a strategy can be plainly seen.
For example, the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund's "Marriage
Project," as well as other programs, are using the push for same-sex
"marriage to help bring about a cultural revolution in our society.
These activists have patterned their crusade after the civil rights leaders.
This quote from Evan Wolfson, who heads the Marriage Project, is typical of
the homosexual rights movement: "As Martin Luther King, Jr. put it,
'In this Revolution, no plans have been written for retreat.' We must
ready ourselves and advance toward other goals" _(Crossing the
Threshold: Equal Marriage Rights for Lesbians and Gay Men by Evan
Wolfson)._
What "other goals" was Wolfson referring to? Michael Signorile,
quoted in _OUT Magazine_, sheds more light on this radical agenda:
Wolfson and Signorile are not alone. The National Coalition of Gay
Organizations created a "Gay Rights Platform" that included
these goals:
If these extremists have their way, America will not only condone
homosexuality, but will become the world's greatest promoter of every form
of sexual deviancy. The traditional family will be left in ruins and moral
constraints wil (sic) be cast aside--all under the guise of equality. If you
look around, you can see that this is already happening. The train is
approaching.
Additionally, America already does condone homosexuality just as America
already condones heterosexuality. Most of America doesn't have the sick
fascination of these homophobic bigots and don't care what people who
love each other do in the privacy of their own homes. But then most people
aren't latent homosexuals driven to homophobia by the conflict of their
religious beliefs and their embarrassing sexuality.
(See "Testing penile physiological responses with homosexual
stimulus")
PICKING UP STEAM
In the last two decades, the gay rights movement has gained unprecedented
cultural acceptance. Homosexuals in America have transformed their image
so well that it now appears a majority of leaders in science, entertainment,
education and business support the homosexual lifestyle.
For example, in the December 1996 _Baehr v. Miike_ ruling, when the State
of Hawaii became the first court to ever legally sanction same-sex
marriages, the Circuit Court relied, in part, on the testimony of
"experts" in the field of psychiatry. According to Kyle Pruitt,
"Gay and lesbian parents are as fit and loving as non-gay parents and
couples." The Court referenced the testimony of a Dr. Schwartz:
"There is no reason related to the promotion of optimal development
of children why same-sex couples should not be permitted to marry."
The homosexual movement uses the testimony of such "experts" to
validate a lifestyle and even promote the purported positive social
benefits of homosexuality.
Hollywood has helped in this image makeover as well. Slowly,
cross-dressing and then homosexual characters have been introduced to
movies and television. Finally, full acceptance came on April 30, 1997,
when Ellen Degeneres' alter ego in the sitcom _Ellen_ announced that she
was gay. This carefully orchestrated "coming out" party, which
was celebrated openly by the media elite, marked another milestone in
the mainstreaming of homosexuality in America.
In fact as American society matures and throws-off the abuses of our
still heavily priest-ridden country, the demand for equality has been
making solid progress -- something hate-filled bigots fear.
More quietly, the homosexual cultural revolution has invaded our
workplaces as one company after another adapts to the changing culture.
Such corporate giants as Apple Computer, Eastman Kodak, Hewlett Packard,
IBM, Microsoft, The New York Times, Sprint, Time Warner, Walt Disney,
Xerox, and many others now offer benefits to domestic partners
(see _World_, April 26, 1997, p. 16-17).
Because the policies of Fortune 500 companies invariably "trickle
down" to smaller businesses, the societal effect of changes in the
workplace can be dramatic.
Just imagine. Gay couples could be given the right to obtain medical
coverage for their children and for themselves.
Perhaps the key battleground is the classrooms of America, where
pro-homosexual education materials like _Daddy's Roommate_ regularly
appear on the reading lists of even our youngest children. Here at the
American Center for Law and Justice, we receive calls from shocked
parents who report blatant examples of the pro-homosexual agenda.
Schoolteachers also often turn to us for help.
FAST TRACK TO CHANGE
At the same time that homosexual rights activists conduct their "slow
march" to cultural acceptance, a panzer movement is underway through
the courts that is designed to fast track the homosexual extremists toward
their goal of making homosexuality a protected status while redefining the
family.
Every bill or measure constructed by civil and Constitutional rights
groups demand equality for heterosexuals and homosexuals alike.
It's the same strategy that abortion advocates used to create a
constitutional right to abortion. Now, the crusade for a constitutional
right of sexual orientation is underway.
Why the courts? Because judges are not accountable to the democratic
process. Once they decide to abandon the rule of law, they wield enormous
power as social architects. As a result, it takes just a few votes, not 51
percent of an elected assembly, to change the laws.
In fact discrimination against homosexuals is unconstitutional; whether
all 260 million Americans voted to execute homosexuals or not, doing so
is against the law.
Abraham Lincoln understood this fact. In his First Inaugural Address,
Lincoln said:
In 1993, two Hawaii Supreme Court justices, dissenting in _Baehr v.
Lewin_, recognized that this scenario of judicial tyranny was unfolding
in their state. Justices Heen and Hayashi warned that the Court was
manufactuing (sic) "a civil right which is unsupported by any
precedent." They saw that the legal trend in Hawaii would have
"far-reaching and grave repercussions on the finances and policies
of the governments and industry of this state and all the other states
in the country" (see _Baehr v. Lewin_, 852 P.2d at 70-74).
In any event the same complaints were uttered by plantation owners and
racial bigots of the America not 100 years ago. The struggle for equality
will continue regardless of how many hate-filled bigots want to maintain
the status quo -- and their hate-generated revenues.
The courtroom is the key. If homosexuals can win the battle of the
courtrooms, they will be guaranteed victory in the culture war. That is
why the American Center for Law and Justice has implemented a nationwide
strategy to confront this issue. We have been heavily involved in the
battle in Hawaii and are committed to defending marriage and the family on
a state-by-state and, if necessary, county-by-county basis.
DERAILING THE CULTURE
With the stroke of a pen, the Circuit Court of the State of Hawaii became
the first court in the history of the world to legally sanction same-sex
marriages. This is despite the fact that 73 percent of Hawaiians polled
oppose same-sex marriages.
The American Center for Law and Justice has labored intensively to ensure
that this ruling does not become the law of the land in Hawaii or across
America. We are closely monitoring the Hawaii Supreme Court's review of
the case. Plus, we played a critical role in working to see a
constitutional amendment defending traditional marriage come to a vote
before the people of Hawaii.
The final outcome of this battle in Hawaii is not yet known. If
homosexuals are allowed to marry in Hawaii, all other states, the federal
government, and private businesses may be forced to recognize these
marriages in a variety of ways, including:
In spite of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which I supported in
testimony before the U.S. Congress, thousands of homosexuals would flood to
the "Aloha state" and then return to their states demanding their
marriages be recognized under what is called the "full faith and
credit" clause of the U.S. Constitution. As one lesbian activist
stated, "We'll be on the first plane out [to Hawaii]! So many of
us are just waiting for the day that our relationships are legally
recognized" (Deb Price, _Detroit News_, August 1995).
If same-sex marriage is allowed, the family would never be the same.
America's moral landscape would be transformed literally overnight. That
is why the same-sex marriage issue--and the unfolding drama in Hawaii--is
undoubtedly the most crucial battleground in today's culture war. In fact,
it could be the decisive battle for the soul of America.
STOPPING THE TRAIN
"Homophobic." If you haven't been hit with that charge yet--and
you are a concerned Christian who believes in traditional marriage--you
will be soon enough. In fact, you can expect to hear that charge more and
more in the coming months. But it's a charge that demands an answer. For
unless we can answer it, the homosexual extremists will have their way in
our business, classrooms and even our churches.
Let's start with the Bible. The biblical record is clear: homosexuality
is an abomination to God. Go back and read the account of Sodom and
Gomorrah (Gen. 18,19). Read the direct prohibition against homosexuality
in the Mosaic Law (Lev. 18:22). Study the Apostle Paul's account of the
depraved mind in Romans I. You will see that throughout the Bible, God
strongly prohibits homosexuality.
Also why you're doing research, check out the "crime" which
Sodom and Gomorrah were "found guilty" of. Bigots like to
think it had something to do with sexuality. They like to think that
because they've never read their own mythologies.
Rev. William Sloane Coffin writes:
"...Scholars are far less clear about what happened [in Sodom] than
are most contemporary evangelists. If, however, we allow the Bible to
illuminate its own cloudy passages, we find that the destruction of Sodom
and Gomorrah had little if anything to do with homosexuality. In Ezekiel
we read, 'This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters
had pride, surfeit of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the
poor and needy.' In the first chapter of Isaiah, where Judah is rebuked
through a comparison with Sodom, homosexuality is never mentioned among
the specific sins, which again include a failure to pursue justice and
the oppressed.
"The most likely other sin of Sodom was a failure to show hospitality
to strangers--a possibility indicated by Jesus' words to his disciples:
'Whenever you enter a town and they do not receive you... I tell you it
shall be more tolerable on that day for Sodom than for that town.' How
ironic that because of a mistaken understanding of the crime of Sodom
and Gomorrah, Christians should be repeating the *real* crime every day
against homosexuals!"
The Bible is part of the long-standing historical record that defends
tradtional (sic) marriage. Long before our Constitution was written,
centuries of common law definded (sic) the nature of marriage as one man
and one woman. Since the earliest days of our nation, our laws have
defined, preferred and protected marriage as the joining together of one
man and one woman. Adultery, incest, polygamy, sodomy and other sexual
acts which contravene traditional marriage have from time to time been
outlawed.
This bigot also "forgot" that the Bible specifically states
that only male virgins can make it into Heaven -- but then when you're a
"Salad Bar Christian" picking and choosing what one will
follow and what one won't, one can ignore that little problem.
The Supreme Court has affirmed this position. Here are two cases you
can reference when defending traditional marriage in your communtiy (sic):
_Loving v. Virgina:_ Here, the Court said marriage was "fundamental
to our very existence and survival." The Court also said marriage
is a revered institution "older than the bill of Rights--older than
our political parties [and] older than our school system" (_Loving
v. Virginia_, 388 U.S. 1,12 (1967)).
Also, as recently as 1986, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality
of state sodomy laws, some of which have been on the books for generations.
The legal and historical record is clear: America was built upon the
traditional family. When you come face-to-face with the homosexual agenda,
remember this: even the Supreme Court agrees that the traditional family is
the foundational, social and religious institution of our society.
In Hawaii, the Circuit Court's ruling in _Baehr v. Miike_ in favor of
homosexual marriages was based largely on the finding that "the
defendants presented insufficient evidence and failed to establish or
prove any adverse consequences to the public resulting from same-sex
marriages." That is why it is essential to emphasize that your
community does indeed have a "compelling interest" in refusing
special rights to homosexuals. These interests include:
Also, you must understand the difference between the civil rights movement
of the 60's and the homosexual movement of today: _Ethnic minorities in
America have fought for rights based on "who" they are, while
homosexuals are fighting for "rights" based on "what"
they do._
Simply put, just as we have laws banning polygamy and incest because those
sexual acts undermine society, likewise the state has a compelling interest
to ban the act of homosexuality. And certainly, there is no duty to promote
the act that society deems destructive! In fact, it could be argued that
society has a responsibility to discourage such acts.
If you have a child in public schools, be sure to monitor any and all
schools, be sure to monitor any and all school books, videos, audios (sic)
and other materials. If you encounter a textbook or program that is
obviously promoting the homosexual lifestyle, bring this to the attention
of your school's administrators. If they fail to take action to remedy
the situation, contact our offices immediately.
Also, when homosexuals try to dictate cirriculum (sic) content in your public
school system, know that you are standing on solid legal ground in trying to
stop them in their tracks. But I encourage you not to take them on alone.
Our staff of attorneys are here to assist. We have assembled volumes of
briefs and case evidence to establish the legal position which defends the
family and protects our children from homosexual indoctrination. Often, a
demand letter is all it takes, but if necessary, we will assign counsel to
the case in your community and fight for the family until we win.
The pattern is predictable. First, a company will adopt a "sexual
orientation" non-discrimination policy. This policy may seem innocent
at first, but it moves the focus of the debate from morality to equality and
fairness. _World_ magazine referencing the Human Rights Campaign, reports
that "more than half of the Fortune 500 companies have already adopted
sexual orientation non-discrimination policies, as have 165 cities and
counties, 67 of the 100 largest law firms, and 64 U.S. Senators"
(_World,_ April 26, 1997, p. 17).
Once the non-discrimination policy is passed, and the moral basis of
opposing homosexuality is eliminated, companies invariably begin granting
"spousal" beenfits (sic) to the partners of homosexual employees.
What can be done? If you are an employer, understand that the law does
not require you to adopt "sexual orientation" language to your
non-discrimination policy, nor are you required to provied (sic)
"spousal" benefits to the partners of homosexual employers.
Sadly, this could all change if the Employment Non-Discrimination Act
(ENDA) passes Congress. In 1996, ENDA was narrowly defeated in Congress
when homosexual rights supporters attemtpted (sic) to attach it to the
Defense of Marriage Act. ENDA would revolutionize the workplace, requiring
businesses to adopt pro-homosexual policies. We will be fighting ENDA and
any similar bills which would require private employers to subsidize
homosexuality.
There's no such thing as "pro-homosexual policies" and more
than there are "pro-heterosexual" policies.
In actual fact discrimination against people due to sexual orientation
may or may not be part of one's State's laws. ENDA is a federal mandate
for equal protection for heterosexuals as well as homosexuals. Quite
simply it states that bigoted discrimination against people simply because
of their sexual orientation isn't going to be tolerated in our polite
society.
It doesn't state that discrimination against homosexuals isn't to be
allowed: it states that discrimination based upon sexual orientation
isn't to be allowed. These bigots know this. The truth just isn't in
them.
Americans put an end to sanctioned bigoted discrimination based upon skin
color in the 1960's. Now civil and Constitutional rights activists are
working to put pull the fangs off of the remaining neo-Nazi fascists among
us.
DRAWING THE LINE
I believe we are at a crucial point in the battle over homosexuality and
the meaning of the family in America. We must draw a line and determine
to stop the advance of this radical agenda. We must be on the alert in
every community across the nation, and stand ready to win the battle in
the classrooms, courtrooms and legislative halls of our land.
But we must do more than hold our ground. We must reclaim the land that
has been stolen and re-establish the moral, cultural and legal supports
for the traditional family.
We can draw the line. We can stop the "runaway train" of the
radical homosexual agenda right in its tracks. And if we band together
and commit ourselves to a common goal, we can turn that train back and
protect our families and communities for generations to come.
[photo of Jay Alan Sekulow with caption: _Jay Alan Sekulow is the Chief
Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice._]
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICEŽ
Here's another lovely example. The rise of Nazi fascism started out
with the exact same rhetoric against Jews: fear mongering without a
shred of evidence to back up their outrageous claims.
Note how these bigots pretend homosexuality is some kind of plague and
also note how these bigots seem to think they represent "community
standards" -- just like the so-called "Christian"
Coalition pretend they're representative of Christianity.
When Negros moved into white neighborhoods, racist bigots spoke and wrote
these very same pathetic arguments against the "upity nigras"
setting out to destroy the American Way.
Lastly, note the lies: Homosexual parents are just as successful at
raising their children than are heterosexual parents. Every
study conducted with scientific method indicates that one's sexual
orientation simply doesn't matter to anyone by the individual!
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA NEWS & OBSERVER, September 14, 1997
State of North Carolina
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Larry W. Potts, Chairman
It seems to me that there is a fatal blasphemy behind what these people
advocate. The Jesus Christ depicted in the Christian mythologies wasn't
a bigot! Paul/Saul of Tarsus had some distaste for women yet he didn't
hate homosexuals. Being the creator of the Christian religion one would
think that departing from the examples of Christ and Paul would be
undesirable.
As you've just seen, however, these homophobes attempt to justify their
ideologies of hatred with the Christian bible. They focus upon an obscure
sentence plucked-out of one chapter and obsess themselves into a
spittle-flying frenzy in their need to demonize the innocent and justify
their guilt.
But it's worse than that:
I would be happy to ignore such evil were it not for the fact that such
hate rhetoric gets people killed and that these bigots are working hard
to stall social progress.
I would be happy to let these people rant in their own tight little
circles until they die out of their own accord were it not for the fact
that myself -- not being a Christian -- am next on their list.
"Did you know that Bob Larimer is one of the scum who tried to
push anti-gay initiatives in Washington State? He's currently the leader
of 'Washington for Traditional Values,' and is the opponent of equal
workplace rights for gays in Washington Initiative 677.
Section 1: The war against equality for all.
Section 2: Resentment-filled reply.
Section 3: Why won't Bob answer for his hate rhetoric?
Section 4: Typical fascist hate and fear mongering.
Section 5: What the Religious Reich have in store for you.
Section 6: Justifying one's ideology of hate with religion.
Section 1: The war against equality for all.
The bigot is lying: I-677 isn't a "homosexual initiative."
It's an initiative which addresses neither heterosexuality or homosexuality.
It seeks to impose legal recourse to force equality for all as
dictated by the Bill of Rights.
Another lie: There's no such thing as "special rights" or
"special legal standing" involved here. The I-677 measure
doesn't care what sexual orientation people have; it seeks to impose
legal recourse for discrimination against people due to their sexual
orientation. It works to impose sanctions against homosexual employers
who terminate heterosexual employees due to their sexual orientation
also. As such there's nothing "special" about it.
Well, that's one bigots opinion. That her skin hue is dark doesn't
detract one iota from the fact that discrimination and bigotry remains
discrimination and bigotry.
Which makes it all the more ironic, yes. All the more so when it is
shown that Bob's level of hatred and bigotry against millions of innocent
people have led and continues to lead to inhuman tyrannies being inflicted
upon homosexuals, ranging from beatings to outright murder.
-------
To subscribe to c-news, send the message SUBSCRIBE C-NEWS, or the message
UNSUBSCRIBE C-NEWS to unsubscribe, to
majordomo@world.std.com. Contact
owner-c-news@world.std.com
if you have questions.
In fact if you show any sign of intelligence these bigots won't put
you on the mailing list.
Section 2: Resentment-filled reply.
To: Fredric Rice (frice@raids.org)
From: Bob Larimer (blarimer@e-z.net)
Section 3: Why won't Bob answer for his hate rhetoric?
To: Bob Larimer (blarimer@e-z.net)
From: Fredric L. Rice (frice@raids.org)
bl> is comfortable calling people "lunatics?" I have a campaign to run.
bl> epithets at those who dare to exercise their freedoms as Americans
bl> to disagree with you.
fr> Are you embarrassed by your hatred and bigotry?
Section 4: Typical fascist hate and fear mongering.
Distributed by GLB-NEWS@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
CHIEF COUNSEL'S CONFIDENTIAL REPORT ON THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA
Jay Alan Sedulow
Right away the bigot let's slip a lie: There is no such thing as
"Homosexual rights." There is unequal protection under the
law and homosexuals who wish to demand their equal rights under
the law. Additionally, homosexuality is an orientation, not a political
party; it's being willfully capitalized here to try to pretend one's
sexuality is some kind of proper noun.
In fact the bigot doesn't provide any evidence to support his fascism.
His motivations aren't to get fellow bigots to "recognize" his
fictional "homosexual agenda" -- his motivations are to spread
hatred and bigotry simply because it makes him feel good and fills the
Christian cult's coffers with fast cash.
Translation: I want to provide justification for rounding-up and executing
millions of innocent people and doing what it takes to feed my hatred.
THE TRAIN IS COMING
Understanding The Gay Rights Agenda
In actual fact demanding equal rights and equal protection under
the law is what civil rights and Constitutional rights groups are doing.
This bigot wants to think that just because homosexuals are eventually
going to get treated equally, he some how loses something and the
result is the end of American civilization.
The bigot doesn't explain how granting equality to homosexuals will
"destroy the family as we know it." Does he really wish to
pretend that his family and the families of hundreds of millions of people
in the United States could be so easily destroyed? Or is he
mouthing off hate rhetoric specifically designed to advance lies?
"Homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and
then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely . . .
to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution."
Repeal _all laws_ prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting
persons; repeal all laws against prostitution; repeal of all laws
governing the age of sexual consent; repeal all laws that restrict the
gender or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; extend legal
benefits to all persons who cohabit.
The hate-mongering bigot seeks to tie all gay activists together as though
they were some kind of all-powerful cabal in complete agreement as to their
aims, goals, and desires. In actual fact the primary motivation of civil
and Constitutional rights organizations is equal protection under the law
for homosexuals and heterosexuals with no discrimination.
Why Gays Are Gaining Cultural Acceptance
Science has been working on explaining human sexuality and have an
overwhelming body of scientific data describing sexual orientation of
humans (and other animals) as being a broad-spectrum neither fully
heterosexual or homosexual. Science also shows that one's sexuality
is probably set and immutable by the age of 9. The AMA specifically
pulls the license of any doctor who seeks to "cure" homosexuals
since they're engaging in scientifically-proven quack medicine.
Another bigoted lie: There is no such thing as a "homosexual
lifestyle." In any event, imagine the nerve of using scientists
and medical doctors to determine the validity of an object of inquiry!
(I'm being ironic here, you know. There is no better method for making
an accurate determination of Truth than using scientific method.)
"It's a conspiracy, I tell ya! They're all after our children!"
Yeah, imagine the dramatics. Homosexuals -- if they get equal rights and
equal protection under the law -- could finally sue homophobic bigots
for firing them from their jobs for no other reason than because they're
homophobic bigots.
Yes, let's not only hide the real world from our children, let's try to
get Creationism into them at the same time and really keep them
ignorant and submissive to the Christian priesthood. That'll learn 'em.
How Homosexuals Are Using The Courts
Another lie. (Yes, I was just as surprised as you were.) There are no
organizations seeking to make homosexuality a "protected status."
Every organization and individual seeks to make one's sexuality not subject
to unequal or unlawful protection under the law.
Make a note of homophobic logic.
America isn't a democracy; it's a Constitutional Republic... something
which angers these homophobic bigots so much it's a wonder they don't
leave the country and move to Iran: Some place they like better.
The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government,
upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be inevocably (sic)
fixed, by decisions of the Supreme Court . . . the people will have
ceased to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically
resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent tirbunal (sic).
Curiously the bigot decided not to quote what these "far reaching and
grave repercussions" are. This bigot seems to want to pretend that
granting people equality some how detracts from his life.
In fact Americans have already won this bigot's "war." The
result is the Bill of Rights! What remains is enforcing these
laws which America already fought for.
What Same-Sex Marriage Could Do To America
Once again the bigot expresses his ignorance as to what a Constitutional
Republic is. Once again the homophobe seems to think that the United
States is a Democracy.
In fact the first time America sought to correct its bigotry against the
minority, it took a civil war. This time it'll take constant hammering
to keep the homophobic bigots down until they and their ideologies of
hatred die out like the dinosaurs.
Full state sanctioning of the homosexual lifestyle; government benefits,
including Medicare and Social Security; work leave to care for a sick
partner; retirement benefits; joint health, auto and home insurance
policies; tax advantages; immigration for a partner from another country;
joint parental custody; divorce rights and alimony; inheritance rights;
full adoption rights.
In other words: EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
Note how the bigot doesn't explain how "the family will never
be the same." He just asserts without thinking or explaining that
it would be. Also notice how he seems to think that his own marriage
and the "soul of America" is some how in danger of being
destroyed or something. Is his marriage really so weak?!
An Action Plan For Defending The Family
Note how every homosexual and civil and Constitutional rights organization
are pretended to be "extremists." Every homosexual and
heterosexual wants to be left alone; to be allowed to have equality in
the workplace, in the classroom, and yes -- even in their church.
1. Understand Your Position
First, you must be fully convinced in your heart and mind that you are on
sound moral and legal grounds in defending traditional marriage in your
community. This is the only way you will be able to answer the charges of
bigotry.
While you're at it notice that it also says you're not to cut your beard
or wear clothing made of mixed fibers or eat shellfish or other fish which
feed on the bottom. Homophobic bigots manage to ignore the rest of their
"commandments" and seize upon what they wish to justify with
religion.
(See "Homophobic Christian Bigots have no Excuse" for details.)
In fact the creator of the Christian religion -- Paul/Saul, the Terrorist
of Tarsus -- was against marriage or "touching a woman."
My guess is that homophobic bigots pick and choose what they will read
and what they won't read. Paul/Saul's stated opinion was that it is
better to marry than to "fornicate" outside of marriage but that
it is far better still not to marry.
(See "The Bad News Bible" for details.)
_Skinner v. Oklahoma:_ In this case, the Supreme Court described
marriage, the matrimonial state entered into by a man and a woman as
a "basic civil right" (_Skinner v. Oklahoma_, 316 U.S.
535,541 (1942)).
And it are those very same unconstitutional findings which equal rights
activists and organizations are working to correct.
America was also built upon slave labor and inhuman discrimination.
2. Take A Stand In Your Community
To defend tradtional (sic) marriage in your own community, you'll need more
than a historic perspective. You need to be able to establish that your
community has a "compellling interest" in not granting special
rights to homosexuals.
But first you'll have to show that there is such a thing as
"special rights to homosexuals." Good luck. Perhaps some
day we'll be able to make filing unconstitutional legal challenges
punishable.
<laughing!> Yes, and good luck finding evidence for that.
Every scientific investigation into human sexuality finds that it is
something not subject to a person's control. What these bigots want to
demand is that heterosexuals can stop being heterosexuals if they choose
to.
3. Become An Education Watchdog
As we have seen in recent years, homosexual rights activists aggressively
seek to promote their agenda to the children of America. And, apparently,
no age is too young. One of the planks of the "Gay Rights
Platform" includes a provision that encourages support for
sex-education courses that are prepared and taught by gay women and men,
presenting homosexuality as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle.
And while you're at it, don't forget to complain about presenting
dark skin as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle.
I wonder if this homophobic bigot's wife knows just how weak he thinks
his marriage and his family is. He seems to think that granting equality
to everyone means someone will take away his wife and hand him a
homosexual.
4. Track Your Company's Polices
As noted earlier, the corporate world is quietly being overrun by
pro-homosexual policies that grant a wide array of benefits to the
partners of homosexual employees. But how is it happening?
Now the homophobe begins to expose himself. He wants to pretend that
granting equality to heterosexuals and homosexuals is some how a moral
question. It isn't. It's a question of allowing American citizens to
live as citizens under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution which
guarantees to protect them from the tyranny of the majority.
Why, next thing ya' know nigras will want to get married too!
Golly. The bigot is lying. I'm surprised. Really.
Turning Back the Runaway Train
No matter how many we have to kill this time.
P.O. Box 64429
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23467-4429
Section 5: What the Religious Reich have in store for you.
Davidson County
Before the Honorable Board of Commissioners
WHEREAS, the Davidson County Board of Commissioners is charged with
protection of the safety, health and welfare of the community, and
WHEREAS, there continue to be assaults on those community standards
which have historically and traditionally served to protect the public
safety, health and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners believes that as the elected
representatives of the citizens, it is selected in part to articulate
and protect those community standards; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners believes it must not sit silently
and watch those community standards be undermined; and
WHEREAS, homosexual rights issues have recently again been the focus of
policy decisions from the federal to state and local levels of government;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners desires to establish a public policy,
which will be forwarded to appropriate elected officials on behalf of
the community; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners makes the following findings of fact:
1. The Davidson County Board of Commissioners openly and vigorously
supports the current community standards and well-established state
statutory laws regarding homosexual lifestyles; and
2. The Board of Commissioners pledges not to fund those activities
which seek to contradict these existing community standards; and
3. The Board of Commissioners, as the policy-making political body of
the Davidson County community, seeks the support of other elected
officials in protecting its standards; and
4. The Board of Commissioners believes that this policy will serve and
protect the health, safety and welfare of its constituents; and
5. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board of Commissioners believes that the
homosexual lifestyle adversely affects the citizens of Davidson County
and does not adhere to our traditional family values, and
6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners does not
support the concept of single-sex marriages or homosexual-partner
benefits and will notify all elected members of our state government to
urge them to continue to support legislation to ban single-sex marriages
and homosexual-partner benefits and will urge members of our federal
government to continue to support legislation to ban single-sex marriages
or homosexual partner benefits in the United States.
7. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that since the traditional lifestyle has proven
to be the primary and best method for fostering a positive development
in children and since homosexuality choice made by adults that conflicts
with the traditional lifestyle, the Board of Commissioners does not support
any legislation or policy that allows the adoption of children by
homosexuals.
8. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board of Commissioners strongly condemns
this lifestyle and intends to send this message to policy-makers of this
country.
Adopted this the 10th day of December 1996.
Davidson County Board of Commissioners
Section 6: Section 6: Justifying one's ideology of hate with religion.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page.
Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank