On 23 Apr 1999 08:23:41 -0700, in alt.religion.scientology you wrote:
I see no one who was there has to date posted a report of the Erlich pretrial
hearing yesterday; this is the information I received on IRC from those who were
there:
* Whyte made a ruling of the 19th that the OT materials could no longer be
considered 'trade secrets' and would have to be refiled openly, which means they
would be available for public view, but not copying, which effectively destroys
CoS' attempt to define those levels as 'trade secrets.'
* An argument relating to threads in newsgroups and how this affects the
principle of fair use will be allowed to be presented by Morrison and Foerster.
* Whyte was observed to be displeased in sidebar when Rosen attempted to use the
Henson case as a precedent.
* Claims and counter-claims will be split. There will be a bench trial on the
copyright claims--Scientology is no longer seeking statutory damages. There will
be a jury trial on Dennis' counterclaims.
* The trial is currently scheduled to proceed for May 4; however, Whyte is also
presiding over a major criminal trial at this time, and so he intends to limit
both sides to a total of 16 hours of presentation each, including
cross-examination, but not including closing arguments, in the copyright claims.
* Whyte tentatively approved RTC's motion for Helena Kobrin to testify, and said
that the cross-examination of Kobrin will not be stopped should it venture into
attorney-client issues. He stated that Morrison and Foerster's witness list was,
in his opinion, too long, and dealt too much with what is wrong with
Scientology, rather than the immediate issue.
* The trial will be open to the public, and will not be closed should "secret
material" be discussed. Whyte apparently intends to allow arguments that the
numerous filings of portions of one whole amount to fewer actual different
pieces of copyrighted material than Scientology alleges.
Overall, it seemed like a pretty good day for the good guys! The newsgroup
thread fair use argument is important, and it's very good that Whyte is
recognizing that the nature of discussion on the Internet includes broad fair
use. The open trial and denial of trade secrets were also victories for Dennis'
side; neither side was happy with the 16 hour limitations. RTC and its
representatives were judged to be very unhappy by those who attended the
hearing.
Charlotte
Charlotte L. Kates CLKates@aol.com
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
tp://www.offlines.org/
FLINESonline: Freedom from Scientology
Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate:
XENU.NET
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.