On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:48:01 GMT, in alt.religion.scientology you
Recently some CoS members have claimed that overboarding
is just a seamen's tradition and not intended as a punishment.
But this claim seems to be just another public relations lie !
Take a look into the new green OEC Volume 0, on page 510 :
--------------------- begin quote -------------------------
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 MARCH 1974
HIGH ETHICS FOR HIGH CONDITIONS
.....
During the high condition period of an org or ship THE
NALTIES ARE QUADRUPLE FOR BREAKING POWER, TRIPLE FOR
EAKING AN AFFLUENCE AND DOUBLE FOR BREAKING A NORMAL.
----------------------- end quote -------------------------
You can clearly see that this policy letter is about punishment.
----------------------- begin quote -----------------------
If it can be shown that a crew member of staff member, by
neglect, noncompliance or false report contributed in ANY
way to the breaking of a high condition, then any usual
ethics action goes by the quadruple, triple, double rule.
Such a member assigned Liability for noncompliance or
Doubt for a false report while the ship or org was in Power
would have to come up to Normal on post FOUR times.
Each time he got to Normal he would start in again low.
A one week's pay fine becomes FOUR weeks.
....
So a usual downstat goofing up during Affluence and getting
an overboard goes overboard THREE TIMES.
--------------------------- end quote ------------------------
Did you get that ? Being thrown off a 60 feet high ship 3 times
to administer severe punishment. Or even 4 times.
And if you still have any doubts read the Expanded Dianetics
Series from 1972 ( on page 412 in the new Red Volume ) :
---------------------------- begin quote ----------------------
Auditors who don't do LRH C/Ses have been known to get very wet !
---------------------------- end quote -------------------------
I hope this clears the matter up, finally, and renders you immune
against CoS lies. ( Both texts have been published in the early
90ies, and are thus still calid. )
Norman
PS: Hey OSA guys, there is no use to call me 'religious bigot'
or something. I am a practising Scientologist myself ( out of
CoS ), I am auditing daily etc. I do not and will never attack
our religion. But I am very prone to attack lies and abuses of
any kind, if done in the name of religion. And that's your hat,
too !
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
wrote: rman_suchanek
ISSUED 24 FEBRUARY 1982
RRECTED AND REISSUED 5 OCTOBER 1985
Formerly issued as Flag Order 1726, 12 January 1969 )
Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate:
XENU.NET
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.