Subject: Omitted Rons' Copyright Notices
Hi Fellow Scientologists,
While comparing my "By L. Ron Hubbard" green policy volumes with my "newer
and improved" dba "L. Ron Hubbard Library" (Church of Spiritual Technology,
Inc) green policy volumes, I accidently ran into another ommission.
When HCO PL's were issued, they ALWAYS included the copyright notice at the
bottom with WHO was responsible for routing/editing/typing up Rons policies.
At the end of the page, the notice usually goes like this ...
LRH:jw.rd
This is put at the end of each of these policy letters WITHOUT exception.
Only the innitials after "LRH:" may have been different.
The mystery is ... this copyright notice is OMITTED from all the "new and
improved" dba "L. Ron Hubbard Library" (CST,inc.) green volume versions.
There are NO exceptions. EVERY single one of Ron's individual policy letters
are missing Ron's Copyright notice.
WHY?
The only copyright notice in the new CST green volumes is in the front and
it says ...
Copyright 1991, L. Ron Hubbard Library, All Rights Reserved
But my "old" set of green volumes says ...
Copyright 1970, 1974
1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962
1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
You see, Ron did some things for us to build in protective mechanisms and
one of those was to place his copyright logo on ALL his HCOB's and HCO PL's
as insurance that they would NOT get altered. So when I see ANYTHING not
made an exact copy of, it gives me a rather alert eye. So I started to do a
little digging to try to find an explanation and I seem to have turned up
with something.
Go to ....
http://www.clever.net/webwerks/veritas/cst/copygrab.htm
"Shortly after the reported date of L. Ron Hubbard's death--24 January
1986--Norman F. Starkey was appointed as Executor of L. Ron Hubbard's will
and estate. But Starkey operated under a dizzying array of titles,
including:
1. Norman F. Starkey, Executor of the Estate of L. Ron Hubbard & Trustee of
Author's Family Trust
2. Norman F. Starkey, Executor of the estate of L. Ron Hubbard
3. Norman F. Starkey, Executor of the will of L. Ron Hubbard, d.b.a. L. Ron
Hubbard Library
4. Norman F. Starkey, Executor of the will of L. Ron Hubbard
5. Norman F. Starkey, Trustee of Author's Family Trust-B
6. Norman F. Starkey, Trustee of the Estate of L. Ron Hubbard & Trustee of
Author's Family Trust
7. Norman F. Starkey, Trustee of Author's Family Trust-B d.b.a. L. Ron
Hubbard Library
8. Norman F. Starkey, Trustee of Author's Family Trust
No matter what he called himself, he spent seven years gathering up every L.
Ron Hubbard copyright in sight. Then on 29 November 1993, less than two
months after the Church of Spiritual Technology (CST) was granted tax
exemption by IRS, Starkey transferred all the L. Ron Hubbard copyrights to
CST, as is illustrated below. (NOTE: The "License Agreements" illustrated
between Starkey and the Religious Technology Center (RTC) did not transfer
actual ownership. The other transactions shown in the chart do indicate transfer of
ownership, referred to as "assignment.")"
So on this date of 29 November 1993, Norman Starkey transfered all 7,730
titles in a Transfer of Copyright to Church of Spiritual Technology (CST).
I was certainly not familiar with any of this. There is nothing written
about this Scientology history in the BOTWO book "What is Scientology."
Apparently this is history we're not suppose to know. I wondered, who in the
heck is Church of Spiritual Technology? So I found more data about that at
...
http://www.clever.net/webwerks/veritas/secret/index.htm
It behooves us to know who now controls the copyrights to all LRH works too,
doesn't it? Especially when we see squirreling.
Here's who they apparently are and I'll quote ..
"There are four co-founders: Sherman Lenske, Meade Emory (former Assistant
to the Commissioner of IRS), Lyman Spurlock, and Leon Misterek. Of the four,
only Lyman Spurlock even claims to be a Scientologist. He is also a CPA. The
other three are tax and probate attorneys. Although the four are named as
co-founders in a 1992 United States Claims Court ruling, Sherman Lenske is
named as "sole incorporator" in the Articles of Incorporation."
So perhaps we need to get the above founders of Church of Spiritual
Technology to tell RTC to do it's job of insuring the purity of Rons words
because apparently RTC cannot get their own ethics in about this
squirreling.
They made alterations in the exact text of ALL our admin policies by
DELETING all of Ron's copyright notices. Making ANY change in itself is not
ok. But RTC allowed WHOLESALE ALTERATIONS AND DELETIONS on ALL of Hubbards'
policies which is a Scientology high-crime of immeasurable proportions!
DUPLICATION -- TO MAKE AN EXACT COPY OF
What word does RTC not understand. They are to be held accountable for this.
RTC has a BIG m.u. (misunderstood word) on the word DUPLICATION
We can no longer turn a blind eye and let this continue.
Yours for not squirrling tech and getting to the bottom of truth,
Safe
--
"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all
subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat
us."
-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)
David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!
For freedom of discussion of CofS's unethical behavior, go to ...
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/churchofscientologysethics
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: "Safe"
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 16:15:35 -0700
Copyright 1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate:
XENU.NET
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.