Scientology Crime Syndicate

Subject: Why CofS'ist lie for DMSMH
From: "Safe"
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 10:42:42 -0700

There are items in DMSMH (Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health) that are actually untrue, for example:

"A clear, for instance, has COMPLETE RECALL (emphasis mine) of everything which has ever happened to him or anything he has ever studied." -L. Ron Hubbard, DMSMH (book 3, chapter 2)

The above quote has already been PROVEN to be false, yet Church of Scientologists keep promoting the book as truth anyway ... either out of ignorance that it contains false data or because they are forced to if they are staff members.

You see, if they say otherwise, they are committing CRIMES against the Church of Scientology. So they feel they CAN'T speak out. Their hands are tied by CofS with the "Code of Descipline" of CofS right out of the "ethics" book. If they did speak up, they would be accused of the following "crimes" by CofS authorities ...

1) Verbally stating comments to students such as "background", "not used", "old", "historical", or any such comments.

2) Spreading false tales to invalidate Clears or spreading libelous and slanderous statements about the alleged behavior of Clears.

3) Placing Scientology or Scientologists at risk.

4) Spreading destructive rumors about senior Scientologists

5) Committing a problem.

6) Public statements against Scientology or Scientologists in good standing with the Scientology organizations.

7) KSW #3 ... NOT knowing the technology is correct.

These are "HIGH CRIMES" right out of the 1998 "Introduction to Scientology Ethics" book. So if CofS'ists object to this lie or any other in DMSMH, they would most certainly get declared a Suppressive Person and "lose their bridge."

The reason Church of Scientologists don't keep their own personal integrity on this is out of FEAR. It's FEAR of the CofS. It's FEAR of losing their "bridge" to spiritual freedom due to an "SP declare". They don't want to have to hassle through a major "ethics handling."

Even if Church of Scientologists KNOW it's a lie, they are compelled to stay quiet because of this pressure by the Church of Scientology. So when CofS'ists don't answer to critics on these kinds of lies, think about the consequences they are worried about even if they know or may think the critics data is possibly true. To them, keeping quite will keep them out of trouble.

It's sad to see that Church of Scientologists compromise their integrity. They are afraid to keep their personal integrity and the "code of honor." The Scientology "code of honor" says ...

"Never compromise with your own reality."

"Be your own adviser, keep your own counsel and select your own decisions."

"Your self-determinism and your honor are more important than your immediate life."

One's self determinism and honor are SENIOR to Church of Scientology's policy. It is my hope that one day ... Church of Scientologists will get that. But under the current suppressives they are dominated by, it may be a while before they cognite on the seniority of importances.

HONOR or POLICY? Which do you think is senior?

Yours for personal integrity, Safe, an authentic, informed NON-CofS Scientologist

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For freedom of discussion of CofS's unethical behavior, go to ...


Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate: XENU.NET

This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.

Further facts about this criminal empire may be found at Operation Clambake and FACTNet.


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank