Subject: What your donations buy...
From: plmlp@eis.bris.ac.uk (ML Poulter)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:58:31 GMT

In article <381e086c.214600113@news.snafu.de>,
Tilman Hausherr wrote:
> ... UKP 155000 to suppressive Bonnie Woods!
> (plus millions wasted for scientology's own legal costs)

Very true. Ordinary scientologists, how do you feel about management paying out this sum (nearly US$250000) to someone they have called an SP, and making a public statement that she is not a hate campaigner? Come to that, how do you feel about management paying roughly 5 million pounds and six years of litigation for the *privilege* of doing this? Is this what is called "making it go right?"

Are you happy that the church is being managed competently in light of this? What happened to the OTs? Scientology was being sued by a couple of "downstat" "SPs" assisted by a bunch of "wogs". If you believe in OT powers, why didn't Saint Hill unleash them to wipe out this supposedly suppressive attack on Scientology? Are there no OTs in Saint Hill?

Have management committed a Suppressive High Crime by capitulating totally to an SP like this? Who will get their "ethics" in?

--
MARTIN L: Postgraduate, skeptic, webmaster and censorship-hater researching M POULTER : philosophy of belief and inductive logic at Bristol Uni., England c Cult Concern FAQ + Soppy Compliments Page + Celibate FAQ + Gifts from "Bob" Q Helena Kobrin Page + Scientology Criticism: http://mail.bris.ac.uk/~plmlp/ !

Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate: XENU.NET

Further facts about this criminal empire may be found at Operation Clambake and FACTNet.