Notice: Fredric Rice may have removed segments of the replies given to
questions if they contained copoyrighted materials. After a very short
while, Scientology "experts" refused to answer questions and
started cut-and-pasting copyrighted cult propaganda. Additionally I
removed URLs in some of the replies, and left them in others. And it's
also important to note that eventually the unfortunate "Greg
Churilov" cultist was ejected from
askme.com for his typical Scientological behavior.
Anonymous asked this question on 4/19/2000:
Are Scientologists ashamed of their Church?
Greg Churilov gave this lie on 4/19/2000:
Of course not.
Anonymous then asked this follow-up question on 4/22/2000:
Hmm. Then why does the "Church" of Scientology hide behind official
lies in its claim that L. Ron Hubbard was a "war hero," having been
awarded 21 medals, when actually he received only 4? Why won't the
"Church" admit he was a bigamist? Why won't the
"Church" admit that the only way it was able to acquire the
property in Clearwater was by infiltrating through a front company with
no obvious links to Scientology because [] itself has always suffered
from the worst kind of adverse publicity, DESERVEDLY?
Why are all your responses so cut and dry, and why do you invalidate
everyone else's opinion? Do you believe enemies of the "Church"
of Scientology are to be disposed of "quietly and without sorrow,"
like Hubbard said?
I feel sorry for you. Your "Church" has milked you for all the
money you have, returned you nothing, and will drop you like a used condom
when you run out of money and can no longer afford $cientology, Inc.'s
services.
I'd tell you not to bother answering this post, but I bet you won't
be able to resist.
When you decide to leave $cientology, visit www.xenu.net first, to
pick up some pointers.
Here's a hint: take your pc folder with you when you leave, and
don't sign anything.
ARC, KoX
Greg Churilov, after his solid debunking, gave this insane response on
4/23/2000:
I am sorry that your views and experience of Scientology are so
hateful and negative. I suggest that you choose a different path,
since it is obvious Scientology is not for you. I however am happy
to be who I am and believe as I believe. And we happen to live in
a Country that supports the First Ammendment.
So if it is not much to ask, please stop harrasing me. best,
Anonymous then rated this answer a 1, saying:
I knew you wouldn't be able to resist. Isn't that what you've
learned: "Never defend -- always attack?"
Apparently, you don't like the fact that I am protected by the
same laws which protect your rights, but that's too bad.
The truth about $cientology isn't something most $cientologists are capable
of facing because it violates "Source" -- what L. Ron Hubbard
taught them was true and rig [] attack."
I'm sorry you're one of those people.
My follow-up question was an honest one, and you failed to respond
to it, preferring instead to attack me for having asked it, exactly
as you have been taught by the "Church" of Scientology, based on
the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard.
You fail, ma'am.
You've already demonstrated the tactics of the "Church" of
Scientology in response to criticism better than I ever could
have.
Thanks.
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Subject: Question...
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.