Notice: Fredric Rice may have removed segments of the replies given to
questions if they contained copyrighted materials. After a very short
while, Scientology "experts" refused to answer questions and
started cut-and-pasting copyrighted cult propaganda. Additionally I
removed URLs in some of the replies, and left them in others. And it's
also important to note that eventually the unfortunate "Greg
Churilov" cultist was ejected from
askme.com for his typical Scientological behavior.
Subject: 'Bestsellers?'
MarkAbb asked this question on 5/8/2000:
Better watch out, kid! Your score is now higher than spirit's and
larrybergen's... so they will soon try to get you ejected like desertphile!
Oh, I'm supposed to ask a question, aren't I? With spirit and larrybergen
"asking" each other big chunks of text taken from scientology.org and
giving each other "high fives", I almost forgot...
How did Battlefield Earth and Hubbard's other later SF works become
bestsellers? Is there any evidence that Scientologists and the Church were
buying up copies of the book to inflate sales statistics?
honorarykid gave this response on 5/8/2000:
I just hope I don't present as much of a threat to them as did
Paulette Cooper.
Battlefield Earth and Dianetics both enjoyed more "official" sales than
they deserved. Scientology allocated money from it's budget and also
ordered it's members to purchase copies.
In an amazing show of bizarre thinking, many of the extra, unneeded
copies of these books were then turned in at the orgs and missions by
their purchasers, only to be repackaged and resold to bookstores as
new books by Bridge Publications.
There are many testimonials from bookstore employees who
unpacked these "new" books only to find their inventory and store
stickers already placed.
When the LRH inspired movie, Battlefield Earth, opens this weekend, I
hear that there is going to be a similar effort.
According to a correspondent at the San Diego Union:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scientologists are quietly being told when they go to the theater to
see BE (which they will) they are to buy extra tickets. They are then to
return the unused tickets to a person who is designated in their area
for a refund.
Now get how this works better than the books. Let's say four friends
go. Each buys four tickets. Four tickets are torn in half when the
person enters. The other 12 are pocketed and then returned. Unlike
the book-scam, the movie theater will not take notice of someone
buying more than one.
That was the tip-off in a lot of bookstores as it is unusual for
someone to come in and buy four copies of a novel. But it is not
unusual for one person to buy four tickets, is it?
In some cases, those who might seek the refund are to be asked if
they would like to make that as a "donation," saving the refund costs.
This too is a good one for not many Scientologists wanted to keep
four copies of a book. But to make BE the #1 movie, many will be
willing to do this. But this gimmick (the "donation") won't happen until
after they come back for their refund.
In some cases, some staff are being designated to go and buy a
block of tickets, but not too many to be noticed, (say 6-8) and not
even go but take them back to the org for the refund. This is to be
done for several weeks.
I don't have the other details but in some cases those who buy the
extra tickets will be offered a trade rather than the refund when they
come back in, e.g., they can trade the value of the tickets (and let's
say the person bought three extra at $7 each, so that is $21) in
Hubbard books, which will also be funded by ASI.
Scientologists are also being told to do it as a "birthday present to
Ron." Some already love the idea of making it #1. They are also
being told they can give the tickets to friends to promote Hubbard,
another idea they also like. They are not to give gift coupons to the
theater but the ticket, to make sure it goes on the BE stats.
ASI has set aside several million dollars for this (and also raised
money) that they will mark off in some "promotional" manner. I don't
have details on this but there are ways to do it that are actually fairly
legitimate, e.g., they are allowed to buy tickets to the movie to give to
friends. I don't know if the way they are doing it is legitimate but DM
is not worried about that any more than he worried about it for the
book buying. The whole point is to make BE the #1 movie and no
costs are to be spared, which means millions of dollars will be spent
on this. The heaviest is to be done in the first week as that is the first
make/break point and then it will go into week #2. But he is throwing
his heaviest effort into the first week. People are to go to the movie
the way they went to the Portland event back in 1985. In fact, there is
a whole BE-promo team that has been set up to coordinate
this, to make sure the Scientologists go and that they buy the extra tickets.
Some of the Deep Pocket boys who usually contribute large amounts
are being hit up for this, to help cover costs. Some are doing it as
"investment."
Now it may be thought that a few million dollars is not enough to do it
but that is just what they are prepared to pay back to the
Scientologists. It is up to the team to see that the Scientologists
"donate" it. Plus the orgs themselves are to get into this. They can
legitimately buy tickets to take staff to movies. This is a legitimate
expense. But every org is to do this but then - try this - they are not
to use the tickets but get the staff to buy their own. A few can be used
for a "bonus" but this is another way they can double their money. So
at this rate, they can keep doubling their monies.
DM can't leave it to promo and Travolta's name to make it a hit and
he knows there are not enough Scientologists in the US to make it a
hit so he has to do the same routine he used back in the 80s to make
the books into "best sellers." Word is out that heads will roll if
BE is not the #1 hit movie in its opening week.
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Answered by: honorarykid
Asked By: MarkAbb
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.