Notice: Fredric Rice may have removed segments of the replies given to
questions if they contained copyrighted materials. After a very short
while, Scientology "experts" refused to answer questions and
started cut-and-pasting copyrighted cult propaganda. Additionally I
removed URLs in some of the replies, and left them in others. And it's
also important to note that eventually the unfortunate "Greg
Churilov" cultist was ejected from
askme.com for his typical Scientological behavior.
Subject: OT III
Raptavio asked this question on 5/5/2000:
Larry, I've had a bit of a dilemma here.
I've heard from critc after critic that the level known as OTIII (Operating
Thetan III) involves a course referring to an "Incident Two" in which some
galactic overlord named Xemu or Xenu did a number on a few billion
people - I won't go over it all again, most critics' sites have the
information.
I took it as read this was part of Scientology (I figure an evil galactic
overlord is no more silly than some guy being nailed to a piece of wood,
so it made no nevermind to me) until I came here and saw Spirit flat out
deny that this was a part of Scientology. I was needless to say a bit
puzzled.
You see, over on www.xenu.net - a noted critic's site - it says there were
court cases related to these documents and that the Church claimed
copyright over them. If the Church did this, of course, it would indicate
that spirit was in error about the story of Xemu or Xenu being true. (I'm
given to understand this document is 'secret' so maybe spirit isn't OTIII
yet?)
Well I decided to find out for myself if the documents were true. A simple
LEXIS search (WESTLAW will do just as well) turned up many cases where
the Church of Scientology sued for copyright infringement over this and
other documents, indicating that according to the CoS itself, these
documents are bona fide.
Now, I don't see the story of 75 million year old genocide being the
source of human misery as being any less reasonable than the stories
behind many of the world's more mainstream religions - a great teacher
being born as an old man to a virgin mother (Taoism), a man who can
turn a staff to a serpent and part the Red Sea (Judaism), or a man being
nailed to a tree washing the world of sin (Christianity), et cetera, et
cetera, so please don't think this is dissing Scientology at all.
What I'd like to know is, is this a deliberate deception, is this just simply
you and spirit haven't reached OTIII yet and simply have no specific
knowledge of the document, or do you claim that Lexis is reporting cases
that never truly existed? (or is there a fourth explanation I missed?)
larrybergen gave this response on 5/6/2000:
The fourth explanation is misinterpretation of data, remember the
game "phone". Whatever you've read on any "xenu" channels is false
data, distorted data. It is designed to disabuse people of
scientology's worth to mankind.
Raptavio asked this follow-up question on 5/7/2000:
Please elucidate on how I'm misinterpreting data by noting that the CoS
is indeed claiming the story of Incident Two as copyrighted church
material.
larrybergen gave this response on 5/7/2000:
These websites are infringing on copyright laws. If they put up the
coca cola symbol and told you coca cola contained rat poison instead
of corn syrup they would be just as guilty of copyright infringement. In
other words that doesn't mean the data presented is true, only that
there is copyright infringement. I've looked at the data they
present it is squirreled, distorted and taken out of context. The ideas
are false and are only , by design, meant to malign the Church of
Scientology.
Raptavio asked this follow-up question on 5/8/2000:
Oh, no. The OT III document is actually part of court record, and
Scientology claims that the document itself is copyrighted. The
Xemu/Xenu Incident Two story is quite definitely a part of Scientology.
I take it you haven't made OTIII yet?
larrybergen declined to answer on 5/8/2000:
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Answered by: larrybergen
Asked By: Raptavio
[Of course he did. He's a liar and couldn't back up his claims - flr]
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.