Notice: Fredric Rice may have removed segments of the replies given to questions if they contained copyrighted materials. After a very short while, Scientology "experts" refused to answer questions and started cut-and-pasting copyrighted cult propaganda. Additionally I removed URLs in some of the replies, and left them in others. And it's also important to note that eventually the unfortunate "Greg Churilov" cultist was ejected from askme.com for his typical Scientological behavior.

FredricRice asked this question on 5/9/2000:

Item number 22 of the Auditor's Code reads "I promise never to use the secrets of a preclear divulged in session for punishment or personal gain."

In light of the audio tape recordings of scientologists doing just that, and the many court transcripts available on the Internet that cover the violation of this item, does anyone know whether this item has been repealed? And if not, would the violation of this item usually result in a Condition of Ethics? And if so, do you happen to know which Condition?

There's no date on the court document that I've read this Item from, by the way.

lrfarny gave this response on 5/9/2000:

Fred,

You have no such tape recordings, only your usual lies.

You believe in nothing and seek to destroy good people who do.

You have failed utterly.

Scientology is winning, growing and you can't stop it.

Heck, you barely get noticed.

The average rating for this answer is 1.

You rated this answer a 1.

If you don't know the answers to questions, might I suggest you merely not answer them instead of trying to make some kind of disrespectful speech?

I know you're not allowed to visit the http://www.xenutv.com/ web site, and I know that people inside of Scientology are told that their PC folder contents are held strictly confidential, so it's a given you would be expected to not know about any of the court documents, audio, and video recordings of the blackmail and extortion uses of PC folder data. I don't blame you for that one bit and I understand fully where you're coming from. No hard feelings for your unfortunate, disrespectful recponse.

Still, some other expert will be able to tell me whether Item 22 has been removed from the Auditor's Code or not. The version that's posted in numerous court documents available on the web have Item 22 and 27 in them so I'm inclined to believe they're still valid and that the application is being "squirreled."

Further facts about this criminal empire may be found at Operation Clambake and FACTNet.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.