Notice: Fredric Rice may have removed segments of the replies given to
questions if they contained copyrighted materials. After a very short
while, Scientology "experts" refused to answer questions and
started cut-and-pasting copyrighted cult propaganda. Additionally I
removed URLs in some of the replies, and left them in others. And it's
also important to note that eventually the unfortunate "Greg
Churilov" cultist was ejected from
askme.com for his typical Scientological behavior.
remiel asked this question on 5/27/2000:
I'm slightly confused. The Church of Scientology has claimed eight million
members (and at another point climed nine million), and has claimed this figure
for many years. My question is therefore twofold.
1) how can a group with a seemingly static membership claim to be the fastest
growing religion in the world 2) does anyone have any figures on
how many scientologists there are?
Desertphile gave this response on 5/29/2000:
Hi. Scientology Inc. claims that ANYONE who ever bought a book from them or
filled out a form or "free personality test" is automatically, and forever, a
Scientologits. This is indeed a very odd definition of "member." Note that
99% of people who have ever really been Scientologists cease being
Scientologists in a year or so. Most people wake up to the fact that they are
being lied to, cheated, and abused by Scientologists and Scientology, and
"blow." It is extremely rare for someone to stay a Scientologist longer than a
year or so.
The following article exchange may answer your questions better than I can
with the time I have today.
======
From: Lronscam <NQSPAMLronsscam@aol.comNOTs>
Please make a note of this. This is the evidence anyone ever needs to
realize how few members there are in Scn'gy. We know that the Philadelphia
Org had around 180 members on their mailing list and not even that many
taking courses. We know this because that is what Charlotte Kates claimed,
who was a staff member there a few years back. She was even threatened by
Scn'gy's lawyers that she was in possession of Scn'gy copyrighted material
which was the alleged mailing list.
The Philadelphia Org is a very significant organization within Scn'gy.
Philadelphia is where the..........bing....... Philadelphia Doctorate courses were
developed. It also covers a great deal of NJ (Charlotte is from NJ), Delaware,
parts of Maryland, perhaps even Virginia, as well as the greater portion of
Philadelphia, as a place where Scn'gsts gather to pay for Scn'gy courses. It is
an enormous area to cover for only 180 people to be on the mailing list and
maybe 20 people to be taking a course.
The problem isn't Scn'gy failing in membership but surviving as it does on so
few members. That is the incredible aspect of Scn'gy. If they had the 8
million members they say they had, they might just rule the world.
From: "Oxford Systems" <oxfordsystems@removethistoreply.usa.net>
I had a friend / room mate that worked in the Philly org for a few years. He
left in early 1995 or maybe late 1994 before moving to Atlanta. (Speaking of
Atlanta, anyone know how many clams are active in the org there these
days?) He told stories of long hours, low pay and utter disillusionment when
he came to the realization that the "clears" weren't clear, that the Oh Teas
had no powerz and that it was all a huge scam.
When I made the mistake of getting sucked in to the Atlanta Org after
attending the LRH birthday celebration in March, 1996 and mentioned to him
that I had told them that he was formerly on staff in Philly he practically
begged me to not divulge any information about him to the church. Of course
the church was just as insistent that I "get him in" or tell them how to contact
him.
The thing is that the LRH birthday party was the most widely attended event I
saw in Atlanta. (They rented out a hotel conference room on the north side to
accommodate the party.) In a metropolitan area of more than 2 million
people there could not have been anything over 250 to 300 people (and that
is absolute tops for an estimate) in attendance and quite a few of those were
children and teens. In a metro area the size of Atlanta where some of the
traditional churches have to hold two, three or more Sunday morning services
each and every week to accommodate the crowds this kind of attendance is
no great shakes.
Maybe we should get the ARSCC to fund a "cult count" and survey of the
number of people that are actually visiting and using the orgs on a regular
basis. Here in the US that ought to be easy enough with the exceptions of LA,
Clearwater and Hemet. Somehow I think that the number of actual active
members in the US is under 100,000. Way under 100,000. Way, way under.
Kind of like Battlefield Earth at the box office. :)
From: clkates@aol.com (Charlotte L. Kates)
Just to clarify--180 people are on the call-in list. These are certainly not all on
course at once, 15-40 people is a close estimate, and those 15-40 people
are all part of this 180 at any given time. The call-in list is comprised of
reasonably active publics--people who would consider themselves
"Scientologists."
Central Files, on the other hand, are huge, containing thousands upon
thousands of names of people to whom bulk mail are sent, many, many
invalid addresses and certainly *not* people who consider themselves Scns. A
lot of these people are on the "Bookbuyer" list; that is, usually people who
once bought _Dianetics._ CF is where Scn gets its (probably still inflated) 8
million members figure, since every person who fills out an interest blank,
calls PDO (Planetary Dissem Org, or who staffs 1800-for-trut), buys a book at
an Org, etc. is entered into the INCOMM system and CF.
There's certainly, however, only approximately 180 people in Philly who would
actually describe themselves as Scientologists who are reasonably/moderately
active at their Org, or even around it. The others--they're not Scientologists.
Hell, the 8 million members includes people like me, Warrior, Arnie Lerma,
Stacy Brooks, Jesse Prince, Robert Vaughn Young, Mike McClaughrey, Perry
Scott, Margery Wakefield, Lawrence Wollersheim, etc. We're all in CF, after
all...
From: "roger gonnet" <roger.gonnet@worldnet.fr>
Not so, the 8 millions figure had been explained by Robert Vaughn Young: he
explained that they had to figure out in OSA a newx figure that would show an
increase on the five millions already faked figure; so, they get it out of the
thin blue and said: they are 8 millions now.
But nowhere there has been such a number, even adding everybody having
ever bought a one book in scientology.
It's more than probable that the figure of DMSMH sold is faked too: i'd bet
they never sold more than 7 millions for every language.
So, they know the correct number of active scienos now; that's about 40000...
most of which will quit before Y2K is ended, and some of them replaced by
other "new people in".
That is so evident when you see that in a large event in Paris, where lots of
people from other fucking cults like Raelians were invited, they were unable
to come with more than 300 persons, while in Lyon, with pasrt of the
ettendants being the same than in Paris, they were uneble to get more than
80 persons... including me, to hear what they were saying (lots of nonsense
and some defamations, for which they'll be sued sometimes!)
roger
Further facts
about this criminal empire may be found at
Operation Clambake and FACTNet.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Subject: membership numbers
Answered by: Desertphile
Asked By: remiel
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 23:06:16 -0400
Message-ID: <siuej8tk5pj108@news.supernews.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 22:32:47 -0500
Message-ID: <8gnfmb$a22$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net>
Date: 27 May 2000 05:21:59 GMT
Message-ID: <20000527012159.11458.00000988@ng-ch1.aol.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 11:00:20 +0200
Message-ID: <8go2k7$mih$1@news3.isdnet.net>
This web page (and The Skeptic Tank) is in no way connected with
nor part of the Scientology crime syndicate. To review the crime syndicate's
absurdly idiotic web pages, check out www.scientology.org or any one of the
many secret front groups the cult attempts to hide behind.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.