Public relations -- Don't they care

Question answered by DHutek in Scientology

FredricRice asked this question on 7/25/2000:

Another question that's mostly for current Scientologists however I'd like to web everyone's answers.

After viewing the Scientology cult's insane attacks against Ursula in Clearwater -- screaming Nazi and other absolutely insane nonsense -- the public address system in the airport informed travelers that what they just witnessed was the Scientology cult.

I'm curious whether Scientologists think that such exposure is beneficial to their cult's revenues and continued existance. Surely the cult's management wouldn't be so stupid as to assume that such public exposures of cult followerss' insanity helps their bank accounts.

Thanks i advance for your insights into this.

DHutek gave this response on 7/27/2000:

Since the Church of Scientology is a bona fide religion, I would like to know how YOU feel about YOUR slanderous remarks? I don't know why you take such an "interest" in Scientology and why you feel the need to insult its members.

FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 7/28/2000:

Wrong target.

Answer the question, if you wouldn't mind. I'm curious what Scientologists think about these insane public relations exhibitions. If you don't have an opinion on that, please refrain from answering.

And I'm still waiting for that information on which government agency proclaimed the Scientology cult a "bona fide" religion.

Thanks in advance.

You rated this answer:

DHutek gave this response on 7/28/2000:

Well, I hope that by the time you read this, you will have done some research into the data that I gave you regarding Scientology's religious classification. As far as the episode you speak of, why are you referring to this "Ursula" on a first name basis? Are you friends with her? Are you part of some group that is against the Church? Just curious.

FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 8/2/2000:

Yes, an examination into this cult's criminal history and the so-called "IRS peace plan" shows that no government agency has declared this criminal cult a "recognized religion."

Another wrong target: We're talking about the criminal cult's insanity expressed in the airport and what the cult's ringleaders think they're doing, not Ursula.

If you can't answer the question, might I suggest that you don't lie?

DHutek gave this response on 8/2/2000:

I am sorry that you do not quote specifics when I do, that you call me a liar, and that you do not like my answers. I wish no further communication from you at any time. Thank you.

FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 8/3/2000:

That's typical of the Scientology cult's followers, however I _have_ managed to get some good feedback from _honest_ Scientologists in the FreeZone -- real experts.

There are HCPLs which cover the behavior which the criminal cult exhibited in Clearwater's airport -- which required police officers to guard the safety of the citizens, as you may well know.

It turns ou t that the mad messiah Hubbard wrote policies specifically calling for such insane public behavior -- so the cultists can't be blamed for their behavior not having the ability to think for themselves what they were doing.

You know, _real_ Scientologists in the FreeZone managed to answer this question honestly. Why is it cultists stuck inside of the criminal cult aren't able to address questions honestly?

Any idea?

Thanks

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.