Public relations -- Don't they care
Question answered by DHutek in Scientology
FredricRice asked this question on 7/25/2000:
Another question that's mostly for current Scientologists
however I'd like to web everyone's answers.
After viewing the Scientology cult's insane attacks against
Ursula in Clearwater -- screaming Nazi and other absolutely
insane nonsense -- the public address system in the airport
informed travelers that what they just witnessed was the
Scientology cult.
I'm curious whether Scientologists think that such exposure is
beneficial to their cult's revenues and continued existance.
Surely the cult's management wouldn't be so stupid as to
assume that such public exposures of cult followerss' insanity
helps their bank accounts.
Thanks i advance for your insights into this.
DHutek gave this response on 7/27/2000:
Since the Church of Scientology is a bona fide religion, I
would like to know how YOU feel about YOUR slanderous
remarks? I don't know why you take such an "interest" in
Scientology and why you feel the need to insult its
members.
FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 7/28/2000:
Wrong target.
Answer the question, if you wouldn't mind. I'm curious what
Scientologists think about these insane public relations
exhibitions. If you don't have an opinion on that, please
refrain from answering.
And I'm still waiting for that information on which government
agency proclaimed the Scientology cult a "bona fide" religion.
Thanks in advance.
You rated this answer:
DHutek gave this response on 7/28/2000:
Well, I hope that by the time you read this, you will have
done some research into the data that I gave you
regarding Scientology's religious classification. As far as
the episode you speak of, why are you referring to this
"Ursula" on a first name basis? Are you friends with her?
Are you part of some group that is against the Church?
Just curious.
FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 8/2/2000:
Yes, an examination into this cult's criminal history and the
so-called "IRS peace plan" shows that no government agency
has declared this criminal cult a "recognized religion."
Another wrong target: We're talking about the criminal cult's
insanity expressed in the airport and what the cult's
ringleaders think they're doing, not Ursula.
If you can't answer the question, might I suggest that you
don't lie?
DHutek gave this response on 8/2/2000:
I am sorry that you do not quote specifics when I do, that
you call me a liar, and that you do not like my answers. I
wish no further communication from you at any time.
Thank you.
FredricRice asked this follow-up question on 8/3/2000:
That's typical of the Scientology cult's followers, however I
_have_ managed to get some good feedback from _honest_
Scientologists in the FreeZone -- real experts.
There are HCPLs which cover the behavior which the criminal
cult exhibited in Clearwater's airport -- which required police
officers to guard the safety of the citizens, as you may well
know.
It turns ou t that the mad messiah
Hubbard wrote policies specifically calling for such insane
public behavior -- so the cultists can't be blamed for their
behavior not having the ability to think for themselves what
they were doing.
You know, _real_ Scientologists in the FreeZone managed to
answer this question honestly. Why is it cultists stuck inside
of the criminal cult aren't able to address questions honestly?
Any idea?
Thanks
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.