Derogatory term: Wog
Question answered by escapee in Scientology
FredricRice asked this question on 9/5/2000:
I've run across Robert A. Heinlein's use of the term "Wog" in
his book, "The Number of the Beast." I know that L. Ron
Hubbard hated "Chinks" as he called them, and that the
Scientology cult uses the derogatory term for anyone who
hasn't been suckered into the cult.
Did Hubbard get the term from Heinlein? Or was the racist
term merely one of many used in Hubbard's time and Hubbard
-- and his insane cult -- merely adopt the use of the term?
Thanks.
escapee gave this response on 9/6/2000:
Fredric, your question is so biased I almost didn't answer
it. You state it as a fact that LRH hated Chinese. That is
just not true. I have never known him to hate any group.
There was a black lady who worked for him for years and
years in Washington D.C., and later the Sea Org. She
adored him.
You have to understand the culture of the day. It wasn't
then like it is now. Ethnic jokes were not considered
politically incorrect, and WOG, worthy oriental gentleman,
was part of the humour. When wog was first used it was a
new word, and we were all trying to picture it. Wog,
woggy, sort of not with it sort of thing, and in the middle
of that confusion he paused and clarified it as "worthy
oriental gentleman". Blew a lot of charge, it was funny. It
wasn't intended as derogatory.
It stuck. Like a two-sided coin. Scientologist could realize
that unprocessed people may be "woggy" in a state of
confusion, but one could also remember to be polite.
True, after a few years, the original meaning was lost to
the group (the one I left, not the one I helped create) and
WOG was said in a put-down manner.
Now if LRH had allowed the humour to extend to
Scientology, so that Scientologists could learn to laugh at
their own folly, instead of writing the Policy on Jokers and
Degraders things might have gone/might even go a bit
better. Unfortuneately what was right for Ron to do
regarding other subjects was not OK for us to do on his
subject of Scientology.:)
You rated this answer:
In Hubbard's diary dated around 1951 he stated that the
people in China didn't wash enough and that the problem with
China is that there are too many "chinks" in it. There may not
be hatred yet it certainly was an exhibition of the times.
Doubtlessly his referal to "chinks" was unthinking and merely a
very common practice at the time.
Thanks!
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.