reactive mind or reactive personality?
Question answered by escapee in Scientology
remiel asked this question on 9/23/2000:
I was reading recently (OK it was in a Stephen Baxter story,
but it was presented as fact, not fiction), that some tests on
electrical impulses in the brain showed motor neurone signals
('reactions') before the personality effect that would be said to
trigger them.
For example, in the case of a pistol being fired near a subject,
the subject's body reacts by flinching before the subject's
personality registers what has actually happened.
I know this could be dismissed as merely an extension of reflex,
but the theory being put across was that our emotions and
opinions could be seen as being merely the excuse we give for
our actions, as our course of action is decided by our brain
before our personalities 'decide' to do anything.
If this is the case, does this have any repercussions for
Hubbard's theory of the reactive mind or the thetan?
escapee gave this response on 9/23/2000:
The course of action as decided by the brain is limited in
scope. Flight, freeze, that sort of thing. Exactly what one
will do about something is normally chosen by the individual
involved, not by the brain. Brain may signal adrenaline to be
pumped, but the individual decides what course of action he
will take at that point.
As far as repercussions, no, that was well covered in the
books. Per Hubbard tech man is a composite being, part
animal/body, part mind, part spirit. He took them apart only
to know how to address man as a whole, something which is
often misunderstood by Scientologists. Sort of like a doctor
needs to know there are bones and muscles, and the
difference, in freeing an individual one has to realize there is
more that one part, three primary and of course many
others or Sybils couldn't exist. As long as one has a body he
is a composite, he is not just a "Thetan".
remiel asked this follow-up question on 9/23/2000:
from what I was reading, these reactions didn't seem limited to
simple muscle spasms or adrenaline production, they included
the subject displaying the symptoms of, for example, happiness
before the personality became 'happy'. These things are
measured in fragments of a second, but if they are the case
(and neurologists are still discussing this), it could signify a sea
change in the way we examine the personality. If this is the
case, would the freezone, in your opinion, be more likely to
assimilate this information or to ignore it. I have a feeling I
already know what the CoS would do.
remiel rated this answer:
escapee gave this response on 9/24/2000:
FreeZone is much more open to new concepts.
I rather think that one builds ones own personality as one
goes along in life. Yes, I can sometimes catch myself smiling
before any decision to smile was made, but that is based
not on a "reactive mind" but on what one uses to present as
oneself. One sort of builds a "machine" based on likes and
dislikes, abilities and lack of, as well as possibly past
experiences, and that is the personality.
Everyone "has" a personality. It is just for a lifetime.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.