Curtis Johnson:
DAVE HAMILTON:
DAVID WORRELL:
I may have told this story before. If I have, you'll just have to deal
with it again. ;)
I once worked for a company that disposed of radioactively contaminated
waste. One employee had a rather limited wardrobe - a different colored
Promise Keepers golf shirt for every day of the week.
The general method of dealing with this material was to melt it down,
pour it into molds, and then surround the hardened material with
impressive amounts of concrete.
Toward the end of my stay there, we had a meeting to discuss ways to cut
costs. Several reasonable opinions were offered and discussed. Then
PKboy decides to offer his opinion - "It's obvious that concrete is
our largest material expense. Why not just use less for each ingot?"
My suggestion was just to do away with the concrete altogether and bury
the shit in PKboy's back yard.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
"I upset most xtian type men. I don't know why. I upset their wives
too, but not as badly. That seems to upset the men even more. Somehow, I
would think that the compassionate inquiry about what emotional trauma
destroyed their manhood would be soothing, rather than upsetting."
- Katherine Wintersnight
The major objection to nuclear power, IMHO, is the lack of facilities to
bury the stuff for a sufficiently long amount of time. Perhaps if one
could assure that it would remain in a descending plate. . .
The major objection is fear based in ignorance. Problems with disposal
(temporary or permanent) of waste are put forth as the arguments. The
same people who argue this are happy to leave current pollution problems
unsolved, happy in the faith that "technology" will provide
answers to pollution problems and replacements for depleted fossil fuels.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page.