Open Letter #2 to Mike Rinder re Cancer
Since remarking in that other open letter to you about the behavior of
your volunteer in throwing those remarks at Stacy that she is killing
me (an obvious reference to my cancer and blaming her), I decided that you
need to be told something else.
If I ever hear of that being done again, if I ever learn that your
drones have thrown that into her face (or mine), I will use every resource
I can muster to tell the world how you (collectively Scientology and L.
Ron Hubbard) feel about and treat cancer patients and those close to
them.
I will ensure that every cancer support group - from newsgroups to
mailing lists to web sites - which I can find, gets that message with the
details of what occurred. Time, place, form and event along with this
last incidence and the other times - such as your behavior in Tampa. I
will make sure that it is in the subject line, key words and written
in a way so that if a person reads only the opening paragraph (let alone
the subject line) they will get the truth of how you people feel about
cancer patients and those who support them.
Now let me tell you why I am doing this. I know your first reaction will
be that it bothers me or her and I'm taking this personally. No, Rinder.
It doesn't and you can quote me on that. I said I am moving off into a
new enterprise to help people with cancer (specifically prostate cancer
that kills 40-50K men a year) and I am not going to stand by while
someone treats people with the disease with the disdain you are
ordering to be done. (If that volunteer had know what her insult
meant, would she have said it?)
To insult Stacy or me on the subject is to insult every person with
the disease. Coming from anyone else, I could say it was done in jest
(bad taste), momentary anger or ignorance and would remark more politely
on it. Coming from your people, it is none of these. It is a deliberate
attack of the condition and it shows exactly what the organization and
Hubbard teaches and I will tell everyone who is fighting cancer exactly
that. Then if you want to follow with your despicable "dead
agent" tactics to those same groups and sites and lists, go for
it and be sure to include this message. If you don't, I will.
I don't want you to think that just because I am "retiring" from
speaking out about abuses of your organization to devote myself to cancer
education that I am going to ignore you if you decide to intrude into
that subject.
If you do, I will speak out but it will be from a different perspective.
I will be speaking as a cancer patient, not as a former Scientology
staff member. And believe me, bubba, in the world of cancer, we have a
whole different criterion as to who is an "expert" about cancer. And
think twice before you conjure up someone who "is suffering from
cancer" to come after me. You'll be stepping into a territory so foreign
that it will look more ridiculous than Kobrin's attempt to close ARS by
telling ISPs to "rm" the group, having no idea what "rm"
even means or does.
It is my intention to step away from this particular battle, but if you
want to follow me by dragging in my condition as an attack on Stacy or
me, I will be more than happy to respond.
Secondly - yeah, there's more - if your drones continue to throw our
marriage (meaning Stacy and me) into our faces in righteous indignation as
you have done in the past, I will treat it in the same way and choose
my method of response. It is quite clear exactly what it is that you are
doing. You can issue every denial or Weinberg can challenge it with
"what evidence do you have" but you known damned well that I
know exactly what you are doing. I was trained in the same tech so
nothing more need be said.
I could care less about the rest of your rantings and posturings. You've
taken every shot you can in the last 6-7 years or however long this has
been going on, from picketing our home to anonymous leaflets to direct
threats but you never had the good sense to recognize that nothing
worked. So I don't expect you to stop. (Dept 20/RTC is in desperate
need of Grades 0-IV.) But you've got a chance on these topics. I'm being a
lot more magnanimous than you. I'm giving you a warning because I want
the world to know that I did. I want the world to know that despite your
lack of compassion and direct attack on me and my friends about my
condition, I gave you a chance to change.
Another group that has gone through this is people with AIDS or are HIV
positive. They underwent that sort of assault. (And we know how Hubbard
feels about homosexuality.) It wasn't until those afflicted decided to
stand up in defense not of themselves but of the condition that the bigots
began to back off. It hasn't stopped, but progress has been made.
The fact that you would now open a similar assault on cancer patients
and their supporters puts you and your organization into the same
category and I will be more than delighted to tell the world in every
way that I can. And there is a MUCH bigger world out there interested in
cancer than Scientology or even cults. It is huge. And I will use
them all to bring support to any cancer patient or their supporters
who face the kind of disgusting behavior you have decided to launch
on Stacy and me.
So get that message, Rinder. Attack a cancer patient for having cancer or
their supporters for supporting them or blame anyone for that condition
and you will hear from me on behalf of a very large and growing
population. As to me and Scientology, have a ball. I could care less. That
is no longer my arena or domain of interest. I have another struggle
that requires my time. But you'll hear from me if you reach across into
that domain in any way.
That is a promise.
Over to you.
Robert Vaughn Young
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
from Robert Vaughn Young
Monday, February 21, 2000
2/21/00
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.