Scientology Crime Syndicate

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: David Miscavige: Why attack me? ... Safe
From: barb <bwarr@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 12:04:15 -0700

Yo Davey, you pathetic high school dropout, why don't you guys quit pretending to be a church and openly become the thuggish cult you actually are? Poor Safe...he actually still thinks you're a 'church' with good intentions. Good brainwashing, I'm impressed by the tactics used. It sure works, but when he unmasks your organisation for himself, what's true for us will be true for him too. That is, of course,that you are a goon squad, a thuggery of criminals, facile in lying and hiding behind tarps, a vile blight on our society. Catch a comet, why doncha? love, barb

Safe ... http://www.fzint.org/ wrote:

> Dear David Miscavige,
> Why do you attack ME?
> First, don't you see that this has already been another major "foot-bullet"
> for the church of Scientology? And that if you proceed it's only going to
> worsen the reputation of the Church of Scientology which brings the subject
> ... Scientology ... down in disgrace with it?
> Second, you are attacking me for practicing Scientology.
> It is my duty as a Scientologist "to keep Scientologists, the public, and
> the press accurately informed concerning Scientology, the world of mental
> health and society."
> And "to work for freedom of speech in the world"
> And "to embrace equal justice for all"
> And "to DECRY and do all I can to abolish any and all abuses against life
> and mankind."
> And many others of which I am actively following the most important of these
> codes. Unfortunately, in order to follow the above, I have to break one of
> those codes "allying the Scientology orgs with the public" with regards to
> CofS but NOT with regards to the Freezone. But I believe I'm doing the
> greatest good.
> In so doing the above, I realize it's stomping on and smacking in the face
> of the Church of Scientology. I apologize that I HAVE to do this. But it has
> to be done because nobody is getting ethics in on the church from within.
> The only option is to publicly PR protest which even LRH said there are
> legitimate reasons for one to do so.
> I have many reasons why I'm protesting and I've posted them here on the
> internet. Would you really like to hear what they are and try to work out
> amicably a resolution or do you feel it's smarter to harass and shudder me
> into silence?
> The latter won't work for me. You will have to kill me first. It is my hopes
> that you will not consider the murder option. It has occured to me that a
> potential order could be made from you to do that. Isn't that a shame that I
> trust you and the Church of Scientology SO VERY LITTLE that I believe you're
> capable of even murdering? I'm not the only one who feels this way either.
> The church has PROVEN itself to be a BIG ARROGANT BULLY that can't take any
> criticism without reverting to a revenge vendetta. Do you feel this is a
> good reputation to have as a church? Perhaps you like that feeling of bully
> power because you're so short. Perhaps you were picked on when you were in
> school. I know that feeling. But I certainly hope you've audited out the
> charge on your shortness and helplessness from past bullys by now.
> Didn't YOU recently announce to the whole church membership at a big IAS
> event that the Church of Scientology wants to have a "light touch" now? How
> are you and the church demonstrating that?
> It certainly hasn't been practiced on me. Nobody from CofS even gave me the
> courtesy to email me and tell me that they thought that I was violating the
> copyrights in those two posts. Why not? This would have shown your sincerety
> in demonstrating your light touch.
> (By the way, what about Matt Bratschi of OSA who posted "the factors" on his
> theology page. Are you going to sue him for copyright violation?)
> If you're reading this board, you see I have a lot of support. Why do you
> think that is so? Could it be that I have popular support because I'm on the
> side of justice or do you just suppose it's because they're all religious
> bigots trying to destroy Scientology. If you care to read what they say,
> you'll find that basically, all they want is for the lying and abuses of the
> Church of Scientology to STOP.
> So why don't you stop the lies and abuses of CofS? Don't you know you would
> have no more enemies if CofS would quit commiting overts. It's that simple.
> Just look at the tech. I'm puzzled why senior management doesn't seem to
> grasp this? Perhaps you can explain.
> I'll be looking forward to your honest dialog. It is my wish that you will
> demonstrate your sincerety to communicate.
> Yours for communication,
> Safe, an authentic, informed NON-CofS Scientologist
> --
> "Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all
> subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat
> us."
> -- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)
> David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!
> For freedom of discussion of CofS's unethical behavior, go to ...
> http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/churchofscientologysethics

-- "The truth will set you free.
Scientology will set you back $360 grand."

Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate: XENU.NET


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank