Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TO ALL PRESS
"I'm disappointed that Ava M. Paquette, who represents the Church of
Scientology Bridge Publications, lied in her declaration saying that I made
two "verbatim" internet postings of BPI's copyrighted works known as "PR
Series 18", "Suppressive Acts" and "Offenses and Penalties."
She got a questionably legal subpeona to violate my privacy under these
false pretenses. What I find strange is that the Deputy Clerk named F.
Danton (who signed the Subpoena) couldn't even find any record of the
subpoena. There was no judge named on it, no caption, no case # or docket #.
According to the "Pro Se" department in the same New York office, a subpeona
is not valid without a docket #.
So AT&T did not have to lawfully honor it according to the New York district
court I called.
I was only trying to reach the judge to file some kind of legal motion to
order AT&T to extend me more time before they released my name to a group
that is well known to harass critics ... the Church of Scientology. My
original attorney, Dan Liepold, told me I needed to find a New York attorney
to file the motion. During that course of investigation, I discovered the
subpeona was not valid.
Ava Paquette has also sworn in her statement that "This information will
only be used for the purpose of protecting those rights provided for under
the Act." I don't believe that. So if I get harassed by the Church of
Scientology's Office of Special Affairs (OSA) or it's independent "OT
committee" Church of Scientologists, or private investigators, I plan on
using my full legal recourse. The only way they could have found out who I
am is by Ava Paquette of Moxin and Kobrin.
I guess it wouldn't surprise anybody that because AT&T has put my life at
risk to this harassment organization, that I will be switching both Internet
Service Providers and my long distance service from AT&T to MCI. I'm
disappointed that AT&T caved into the pressures of Bridge Publications and
violated my privacy by giving them my identification without looking at the
full consequences of me, their subscriber, and properly investigating to see
whether or not it was in fact a lawful Subpeona.
Somebody needs to challenge this section of the "Digital Millennium Computer
Act" law because it opens innocent people up for violation of their privacy
and in my case harrassment from a known ruthless organization. With enough
support, I hope to help test the constitutionality of it.
###
by the internet user on alt.religion.scientology known as "Safe"
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Subject: Press Release: For everybody's free distribution
From: "Safe ... http://www.fzint.org/" <Safe2WC@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:06:35 -0700
Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate:
XENU.NET
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.