Scientology Crime Syndicate

Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
Subject: David Miscavige: Why attack me? ... Safe
From: "Safe ... http://www.fzint.org/" <Safe2WC@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 16:20:40 -0700

Dear David Miscavige,

Why do you attack ME?

First, don't you see that this has already been another major "foot-bullet" for the church of Scientology? And that if you proceed it's only going to worsen the reputation of the Church of Scientology which brings the subject ... Scientology ... down in disgrace with it?

Second, you are attacking me for practicing Scientology.

It is my duty as a Scientologist "to keep Scientologists, the public, and the press accurately informed concerning Scientology, the world of mental health and society."

And "to work for freedom of speech in the world"

And "to embrace equal justice for all"

And "to DECRY and do all I can to abolish any and all abuses against life and mankind."

And many others of which I am actively following the most important of these codes. Unfortunately, in order to follow the above, I have to break one of those codes "allying the Scientology orgs with the public" with regards to CofS but NOT with regards to the Freezone. But I believe I'm doing the greatest good.

In so doing the above, I realize it's stomping on and smacking in the face of the Church of Scientology. I apologize that I HAVE to do this. But it has to be done because nobody is getting ethics in on the church from within. The only option is to publicly PR protest which even LRH said there are legitimate reasons for one to do so.

I have many reasons why I'm protesting and I've posted them here on the internet. Would you really like to hear what they are and try to work out amicably a resolution or do you feel it's smarter to harass and shudder me into silence?

The latter won't work for me. You will have to kill me first. It is my hopes that you will not consider the murder option. It has occured to me that a potential order could be made from you to do that. Isn't that a shame that I trust you and the Church of Scientology SO VERY LITTLE that I believe you're capable of even murdering? I'm not the only one who feels this way either.

The church has PROVEN itself to be a BIG ARROGANT BULLY that can't take any criticism without reverting to a revenge vendetta. Do you feel this is a good reputation to have as a church? Perhaps you like that feeling of bully power because you're so short. Perhaps you were picked on when you were in school. I know that feeling. But I certainly hope you've audited out the charge on your shortness and helplessness from past bullys by now.

Didn't YOU recently announce to the whole church membership at a big IAS event that the Church of Scientology wants to have a "light touch" now? How are you and the church demonstrating that?

It certainly hasn't been practiced on me. Nobody from CofS even gave me the courtesy to email me and tell me that they thought that I was violating the copyrights in those two posts. Why not? This would have shown your sincerety in demonstrating your light touch.

(By the way, what about Matt Bratschi of OSA who posted "the factors" on his theology page. Are you going to sue him for copyright violation?)

If you're reading this board, you see I have a lot of support. Why do you think that is so? Could it be that I have popular support because I'm on the side of justice or do you just suppose it's because they're all religious bigots trying to destroy Scientology. If you care to read what they say, you'll find that basically, all they want is for the lying and abuses of the Church of Scientology to STOP.

So why don't you stop the lies and abuses of CofS? Don't you know you would have no more enemies if CofS would quit commiting overts. It's that simple. Just look at the tech. I'm puzzled why senior management doesn't seem to grasp this? Perhaps you can explain.

I'll be looking forward to your honest dialog. It is my wish that you will demonstrate your sincerety to communicate.

Yours for communication,
Safe, an authentic, informed NON-CofS Scientologist

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)
David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!
For freedom of discussion of CofS's unethical behavior, go to ...

Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate: XENU.NET


The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank