Third Party Investigations
"Safe ... www.fza.org " <Safe@scientology.at>
Sat, 22 Jan 2000

Dear Scientologists,

Have you ever wondered why there is always conflict surrounding the Miscaviage Church of Scientology, Inc? Why haven't they found the right third party and it resolve?

In the policy letter by Ron 6, Jan 1970 called "Third Party Investigations"

"The liability of a third party investigation is that a person in the area who has been diligently making reports on outnesses observed or reported to him becomes the most obvious target of declaration as the third party."

(Sound like anybody familiar? :-) )

"When personnel making written reports to proper terminals on out Ethics situations get accused of being third parties it becomes unsafe to report. Ethics without reports becomes ineffective and suppressives have a ball."

(This is EXACTLY what has happend. Proper terminals are unsafe to report to. Suppressives ARE having a ball just as Rons says above, and as I've been reporting.)

"A third party can make all sorts of wild false reports verbally to various staff members. The on-policy staff member hearing these then makes a written report to Ethics stating what was said and who said it."

"When the written report is found to contain false information don't immediately accuse the person who wrote the report of being a third party--check up on who was maliciously spreading the rumour in the first place."

"On staff member aware of a very out ethics situation in an Org that had been affluent and was not crashing into ruin made very proper reports to a higher authority. The reports were neglected. A later third party investigation said the reporting staff member was the third party even though his reports gave all available information, sources of data, who else knew about it and could give data, etc. All reports were in writing and signed. Whenever a report was based on rumour and not proven he stated so. When "revealed as the third party" he assigned himself enemy, cognited that he had exceeded his duties and promised to keep to the standard duties of his post."

In fact he was the only person taking responsibility for the Org and trying to handle the out Ethics situation which was collapsing stats. He should have been commended. Instead his reach was cut and it became unsafe for staff members to make reports."

I feel just like this one staff member Ron describes above. I feel I should get commended by CofS, Inc. There is no safe communication line I've found for proper reports internally because it is now unsafe to write them (as Ron describes above). I was even WARNED by a old-timer Class VIII S.O member friend.

This is also based on my own personal experience and the personal experiences of others of which one I have posted. Also Randy McDonald discovered how unsafe his reports. Go to ...

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/7301/#tmcdp

Yours for really looking at the situation and confronting it,

Safe (Recipient of the Scientologist "Kha Khan" Award and ARS "SP 5" status.) :-)

"Without an alternative to Scientology*, the people in it and the tools and technology of the mind they have are sufficiently powerful that it is feasible and possible it could end up controlling this planet."

(* Church of Scientology, Inc.)

-- Jack Horner (author of Summary of Scientology)

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative". "Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."

-- Lord Justice Sedley

Scientologists: Work towards Freedom of Speech, Ban the Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For the truth about who controls CofS, Inc., go to:

http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/