http://www.latimes.com/business/updates/lat_bk010511.htm
Co-Founder of EarthLink Faces Claims of $600 Million
Reed Slatkin failed to appear at a creditors' meeting in Santa Barbara. He had
received threats, his lawyer said.
SANTA BARBARA--Few who knew EarthLink co-founder Reed E. Slatkin would have
believed he would come to this. But on Thursday, federal regulators, attorneys
and government investigators said his crumbling financial empire faces claims of
more than half a billion dollars in what is one of the largest potential Ponzi
schemes ever probed.
Slatkin took in hundreds of millions of dollars from a nationwide network of
investors, which included Internet moguls, fellow Scientologists, venture
capitalists, Santa Barbara socialites and Hollywood producers.
They thought he was using their money to trade a wide variety of stocks and
purchase other investments, court filings and investors' attorneys allege. Most
of the money is unaccounted for. Slatkin apparently had traded some stocks, "but
we don't know the extent of it," his attorney Richard Pachulski said Thursday at
a creditors' meeting in the office of the U.S. bankruptcy trustee here.
Slatkin has less than $21 million in various brokerage accounts, most of it
invested in EarthLink stock, Pachulski said. About $100 million in investors'
funds was funneled by Slatkin into limited partnerships and real estate deals,
but attorneys said they don't know how much those investments are worth now.
Slatkin, 52, resigned last month from the board of directors of EarthLink, one
of the nation's largest Internet service providers. Slatkin was supposed to
appear at the creditors' meeting, his first public appearance to address
allegations that he mishandled the savings of more than 500 investors, but he
didn't show up. His attorneys changed their mind about bringing him "because of
certain threats that were made and confrontations that have been happening,"
Pachulski said. He declined to elaborate.
Slatkin had been besieged by e-mails, phone messages and letters from desperate,
often angry investors, said Brian Sun, another attorney of Slatkin's.
Tensions were high in the cramped hearing room as investors challenged Slatkin's
attorneys, argued with one another and despaired of ever seeing their money
again. "Some people have suggested that this was a Ponzi scheme," where new
investors' money is illegally passed on as payments to prior investors,
Pachulski said. At this point, "we don't know one way or another what it was."
The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating Slatkin for alleged
investment fraud, and he has been sued by three investors who claim he failed to
return more than $35 million. Slatkin filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
last week. In addition, Slatkin owes about $6 million to the Internal Revenue
Service, Pachulski said.
Patrick Siefe, one of the investors at Thursday's meeting, said he was more hurt
than angry. "I thought he was a hero because he made all his money without
hurting anyone, but he made his money by hurting everyone," said Siefe, a Santa
Barbara computer consultant.
U.S. trustees called the meeting to organize investors into a seven-member
creditors' committee that would represent their interests in court. As they
compared notes, investors and their attorneys began getting a clear idea of how
much money may be at stake.
U.S. Trustee Brian Fittipaldi said no one is sure how much money was invested
with Slatkin, but claims could range as high as $600 million. Some attorneys say
they believe the amounts could be higher.
"It's a very serious, staggering amount of money that's at stake," said Richard
Wynne, an attorney for the creditors' committee of investors. "And I don't
believe personally we're going to find [the money] stashed overseas."
Slatkin remains in control of all the accounts and assets, which is allowed
under Chapter 11 bankruptcy rules, attorneys and government officials said. But
a group of investors filed a motion Thursday asking that a trustee be appointed
to take control of the assets.
Slatkin's attorneys argued passionately against such a move, telling the 90
investors and their attorneys at the meeting that Slatkin was cooperating with
regulators and attempting to help investors get their money back. Appointing a
trustee would slow the process and ensure that lawyers, not investors, get most
of the money, Sun said.
Wynne said creditors were going to file a motion today asking the bankruptcy
judge to freeze all of Slatkin's accounts and assets, and Slatkin's attorneys
agreed not to contest the move.
Records that Slatkin turned over to his attorneys and to an independent
auditor--more than a million documents in 170 boxes, plus three computer hard
drives--show about $100 million of investor funds had been funneled into various
limited partnerships and complicated real estate transactions, Pachulski said.
Pachulski said he wasn't sure whether the $100 million included Slatkin's
personal real estate holdings, which include a four-acre estate in Santa
Barbara's upscale Hope Ranch, a $2-million Santa Monica condominium and property
in the exclusive Newport Coast area of Orange County.
Slatkin has been under SEC scrutiny for more than 18 months for failing to
register as an investment advisor as required by federal securities law.
In January 2000, Slatkin sent a letter to some investors, saying he was
liquidating his investment management practice because of the SEC probe, and
Pachulski said Thursday that more than $140 million was distributed to investors
in the last two years.
Some investors, in fact, got out more money than they put in, Slatkin's
attorneys said. The attorneys have identified one group of investors who
received $120 million more than they invested.
Another group of investors contributed $240 million more than they got out, the
attorneys said.
Copyright © 2001 Los Angeles Times
Return to The Reverend Reed Slatkin main index page
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main index page.
Friday, May 11, 2001
By LIZ PULLIAM WESTON, Times Staff Writer
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which copyrighted and wrote them and may not reflect the views
and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank. The
term "Scientology"® is trademarked to the Scientology crime
syndicate. This information is provided in Fair Use for the public safety
in the hopes that others don't fall for Scientology's related frauds.